Literature DB >> 29948934

Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study.

Carmelo Messina1,2, Alessandro Poloni3, Vito Chianca4, Domenico Albano5, Luca Petruccio Piodi6, Fabio Massimo Ulivieri7, Luca Maria Sconfienza8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) provides an indirect score of trabecular microarchitecture from lumbar spine (LS) dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Increasing soft tissue thickness artifactually reduces TBS values; we evaluated the effect of a fictitious increase of soft tissue thickness on TBS and bone mineral density (BMD) reproducibility on a phantom model.
METHODS: A Hologic spine phantom was scanned with a QDR-Discovery W Hologic densitometer. Fresh pork rind layers of 5 mm were used to simulate the in-vivo soft tissues. For each scan mode (fast array [FA], array, high definition [HD]), 25 scans were consecutively performed without phantom repositioning, at 0 (no layers), 1 cm, 3 cm, and 6 cm of thickness. BMD and TBS reproducibility was calculated as the complement to 100% of least significant change.
RESULTS: Both BMD and TBS reproducibility slightly decreased with increasing soft tissue; this difference was statistically significant only for BMD using HD modality (reproducibility decreased from 99.4% at baseline to 98.4% at 6-cm of thickness). TBS reproducibility was slightly lower compared to that of BMD, and ranged between 98.8% (array, 0 cm) and 97.4% (FA, 6 cm). Without taking into account manufacturer BMI optimization, we found a progressive decrease of TBS mean values with increasing soft tissue thickness. The highest TBS difference between baseline scan and 6 cm was -0.179 (-14.27%) using HD.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite being slightly lower than that of BMD, TBS reproducibility was not affected up to 6 cm of increasing soft tissue thickness, and was even less influenced by fat than BMD reproducibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Phantom; Precision; Reproducibility; Trabecular bone score

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29948934     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-018-1647-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  15 in total

1.  Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Alessandro Poloni; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Carmelo Messina; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Marcello Petrini; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Luca M Sconfienza; Alberto Aliprandi; Giovanni Di Leo; Daniele Marchelli; Fabio M Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Trabecular bone score (TBS): Method and applications.

Authors:  P Martineau; W D Leslie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positions.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Catherine M Gordon; Sanford Baim; Mary B Leonard; Nicholas J Bishop; Maria-Luisa Bianchi; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Craig B Langman; Horatio Plotkin; Frank Rauch; Babette S Zemel; Neil Binkley; John P Bilezikian; David L Kendler; Didier B Hans; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Differences among array, fast array, and high-definition scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on a phantom.

Authors:  A Delnevo; M Bandirali; G Di Leo; C Messina; L M Sconfienza; A Aliprandi; F M Ulivieri; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Giovanni Di Leo; Carmelo Messina; Maria Juana Pastor Lopez; Alessandro Mai; Fabio M Ulivieri; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Trabecular Bone Score: A New DXA-Derived Measurement for Fracture Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Barbara C Silva; William D Leslie
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.741

8.  Densitometer-Specific Differences in the Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score.

Authors:  Gillian Mazzetti; Claudie Berger; William D Leslie; Didier Hans; Lisa Langsetmo; David A Hanley; Christopher S Kovacs; Jerrilyn C Prior; Stephanie M Kaiser; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Alexandra Papaioannou; Jonathan R Adachi; David Goltzman; Suzanne N Morin
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 9.  Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice.

Authors:  N C Harvey; C C Glüer; N Binkley; E V McCloskey; M-L Brandi; C Cooper; D Kendler; O Lamy; A Laslop; B M Camargos; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Simulated increased soft tissue thickness artefactually decreases trabecular bone score: a phantom study.

Authors:  Sasithorn Amnuaywattakorn; Chanika Sritara; Chirawat Utamakul; Wichana Chamroonrat; Arpakorn Kositwattanarerk; Kanungnij Thamnirat; Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Trabecular Bone Score Reference Values for Children and Adolescents According to Age, Sex, and Ancestry.

Authors:  Heidi J Kalkwarf; John A Shepherd; Didier Hans; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Joseph M Kindler; Joan M Lappe; Sharon Oberfield; Karen K Winer; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.390

2.  Bone strain index reproducibility and soft tissue thickness influence: a dual x-ray photon absorptiometry phantom study.

Authors:  C Messina; L P Piodi; L Rinaudo; I Emili; F Porro; C Buonomenna; L M Sconfienza; L Vergani; F M Ulivieri
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-08-14

3.  Inpatient Rehabilitation during Intensive Refeeding in Severe Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Marc Dauty; Pierre Menu; Baptiste Jolly; Sylvain Lambert; Bruno Rocher; Maëlle Le Bras; Adam Jirka; Pascale Guillot; Stéphane Pretagut; Alban Fouasson-Chailloux
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.706

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.