Literature DB >> 35118727

Trabecular Bone Score Reference Values for Children and Adolescents According to Age, Sex, and Ancestry.

Heidi J Kalkwarf1, John A Shepherd2, Didier Hans3, Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez3, Joseph M Kindler4, Joan M Lappe5, Sharon Oberfield6, Karen K Winer7, Babette S Zemel8.   

Abstract

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is used for fracture prediction in adults, but its utility in children is limited by absence of appropriate reference values. We aimed to develop reference ranges for TBS by age, sex, and population ancestry for youth ages 5 to 20 years. We also investigated the association between height, body mass index (BMI), and TBS, agreement between TBS and lumbar spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) Z-scores, tracking of TBS Z-scores over time, and precision of TBS measurements. We performed secondary analysis of spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMDCS), a mixed longitudinal cohort of healthy children (n = 2014) evaluated at five US centers. TBS was derived using a dedicated TBS algorithm accounting for tissue thickness rather than BMI. TBS increased only during ages corresponding to pubertal development with an earlier increase in females than males. There were no differences in TBS between African Americans and non-African Americans. We provide sex-specific TBS reference ranges and LMS values for calculation of TBS Z-scores by age and means and SD for calculation of Z-scores by pubertal stage. TBS Z-scores were positively associated with height Z-scores at some ages. TBS Z-scores explained only 27% and 17% of the variance of spine aBMD and BMAD Z-scores. Tracking of TBS Z-scores over 6 years was lower (r = 0.47) than for aBMD or BMAD Z-scores (r = 0.74 to 0.79), and precision error of TBS (2.87%) was greater than for aBMD (0.85%) and BMAD (1.22%). In sum, TBS Z-scores provide information distinct from spine aBMD and BMAD Z-scores. Our robust reference ranges for TBS in a well-characterized pediatric cohort and precision error estimates provide essential tools for clinical assessment using TBS and determination of its value in predicting bone fragility in childhood and adolescence.
© 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE MINERAL DENSITY; DXA; LUMBAR SPINE; PEDIATRIC; TRABECULAR BONE SCORE

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35118727      PMCID: PMC9018558          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.390


  33 in total

1.  Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Ying Lu; Kevin Wilson; Thomas Fuerst; Harry Genant; Thomas N Hangartner; Charles Wilson; Didier Hans; Edward S Leib
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Michele Bandirali; Alessandro Poloni; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Carmelo Messina; Giacomo Davide Edoardo Papini; Marcello Petrini; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A focused evaluation of lumbar spine trabecular bone score in the first year post-menarche.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; R Winzenrieth; N Binkley; D Krueger; T A Scerpella
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Cross-Calibration of Prodigy and Horizon A Densitometers and Precision of the Horizon A Densitometer.

Authors:  Elise Reitshamer; Kelsey Barrett; Kyla Shea; Bess Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Clinical Performance of the Updated Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Algorithm, Which Accounts for the Soft Tissue Thickness: The OsteoLaus Study.

Authors:  Enisa Shevroja; Bérengère Aubry-Rozier; Gabriel Hans; Elena Gonzalez- Rodriguez; Delphine Stoll; Olivier Lamy; Didier Hans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Optimal monitoring time interval between DXA measures in children.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Li Wang; Bo Fan; Vicente Gilsanz; Heide J Kalkwarf; Joan Lappe; Ying Lu; Thomas Hangartner; Babette S Zemel; Margaret Fredrick; Sharon Oberfield; Karen K Winer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Trabecular bone scores and lumbar spine bone mineral density of US adults: comparison of relationships with demographic and body size variables.

Authors:  A C Looker; N Sarafrazi Isfahani; B Fan; J A Shepherd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Predictors of trabecular bone score in school children.

Authors:  K Shawwa; A Arabi; M Nabulsi; J Maalouf; M Salamoun; M Choucair; D Hans; G El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone Microarchitecture Assessed by Trabecular Bone Score Is Independent of Mobility Level or Height in Pediatric Patients with Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Mirko Rehberg; Manuela Azim; Kyriakos Martakis; Renaud Winzenrieth; Heike Hoyer-Kuhn; Eckhard Schoenau; Oliver Semler; Ibrahim Duran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the revised 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions.

Authors:  Nicola J Crabtree; Asma Arabi; Laura K Bachrach; Mary Fewtrell; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Maciej Jaworski; Catherine M Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.