Literature DB >> 28034592

Densitometer-Specific Differences in the Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Lumbar Spine Trabecular Bone Score.

Gillian Mazzetti1, Claudie Berger2, William D Leslie3, Didier Hans4, Lisa Langsetmo5, David A Hanley6, Christopher S Kovacs7, Jerrilyn C Prior8, Stephanie M Kaiser9, K Shawn Davison10, Robert Josse11, Alexandra Papaioannou12, Jonathan R Adachi12, David Goltzman13, Suzanne N Morin14.   

Abstract

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a gray-level texture measure derived from lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images that predicts fractures independent of bone mineral density (BMD). Increased abdominal soft tissue in individuals with elevated body mass index (BMI) absorbs more X-rays during image acquisition for BMD measurement and must be accommodated by the TBS algorithm. We aimed to determine if the relationship between BMI and TBS varied between 2 major manufacturers' densitometers, because different densitometers accommodate soft tissues differently. We identified 1919 women and 811 men, participants of the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study, aged ≥40 yr with lumbar spine DXA scans acquired on GE Lunar (4 centers) or Hologic (3 centers) densitometers at year 10 of follow-up. TBS was calculated for L1-L4 (TBS iNsight® software, version 2.1). A significant negative correlation between TBS and BMI was observed when TBS measurements were performed on Hologic densitometers in men (Pearson r = -0.36, p <0.0001) and in women (Pearson r = -0.33, p <0.0001); significant correlations were not seen when TBS was measured on GE Lunar densitometers (Pearson r = 0.00 in men, Pearson r = -0.02 in women). Age-adjusted linear regression models confirmed significant interactions between BMI and densitometer manufacturer for both men and women (p < 0.0001). In contrast, comparable positive correlations were observed between BMD and BMI on both Hologic and GE Lunar densitometers in men and women. In conclusion, BMI significantly affects TBS values in men and women when measured on Hologic but not GE Lunar densitometers. This finding has implications for clinical and research applications of TBS, especially when TBS is measured sequentially on DXA densitometers from different manufacturers or when results from different machines are pooled for analysis.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; bone mineral density; cohort study; densitometer; trabecular bone score

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28034592     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  16 in total

1.  Association of trabecular bone score (TBS) and prior fracture differs among minorities in NHANES 2005-2008.

Authors:  R K Jain; T Vokes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Clinical performance of an updated trabecular bone score (TBS) algorithm in men and women: the Manitoba BMD cohort.

Authors:  G I Schacter; W D Leslie; S R Majumdar; S N Morin; L M Lix; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Alessandro Poloni; Vito Chianca; Domenico Albano; Luca Petruccio Piodi; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Predictors of change of trabecular bone score (TBS) in older men: results from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Authors:  J T Schousboe; T N Vo; L Langsetmo; B C Taylor; A M Kats; A V Schwartz; D C Bauer; J A Cauley; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Premenopausal and early postmenopausal trabecular bone score (TBS) and fracture risk: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; MeiHua Huang; Jane A Cauley; Sioban Harlow; Joel S Finkelstein; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicholas R Fuggle; Elizabeth M Curtis; Kate A Ward; Nicholas C Harvey; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Trabecular Bone Score Declines During the Menopause Transition: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; MeiHua Huang; Jane A Cauley; Diana Liao; Sioban Harlow; Joel S Finkelstein; Didier Hans; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.134

8.  Trabecular Bone Score Reference Values for Children and Adolescents According to Age, Sex, and Ancestry.

Authors:  Heidi J Kalkwarf; John A Shepherd; Didier Hans; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Joseph M Kindler; Joan M Lappe; Sharon Oberfield; Karen K Winer; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.390

9.  Measurements of Bone Health after Thyroid-Stimulating Suppression Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Bone Mineral Density versus the Trabecular Bone Score.

Authors:  Chae Won Chung; Hoon Sung Choi; Sung Hye Kong; Young Joo Park; Do Joon Park; Hwa Young Ahn; Sun Wook Cho
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Application of the Trabecular Bone Score in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Namki Hong; Jin-Woo Kim; Deog Yoon Kim; Jung Hee Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.