Literature DB >> 29938684

Performance evaluation of the MOLECUBES β-CUBE-a high spatial resolution and high sensitivity small animal PET scanner utilizing monolithic LYSO scintillation detectors.

Srilalan Krishnamoorthy1, Eric Blankemeyer, Pieter Mollet, Suleman Surti, Roel Van Holen, Joel S Karp.   

Abstract

The MOLECUBES β-CUBE scanner is the newest amongst commercially available preclinical PET scanners for dedicated small animal imaging. The scanner is compact, lightweight and utilizes a small footprint to facilitate bench-top imaging. It can be used individually, or in combination with the X-CUBE CT scanner, which provides the ability to perform all necessary PET data corrections and provide fully quantitative PET images. The PET detector comprises of an 8 mm thick monolithic LYSO scintillator read-out by an array of 3 mm  ×  3 mm Hamamatsu silicon photomultipliers. The monolithic scintillator provides the ability to measure depth-of-interaction which aids in the development of such a compact scanner. With a scanner diameter of 7.6 cm and axial length of 13 cm it is suitable for imaging both whole-body mice and rats. This paper presents the design and imaging performance of the β-CUBE scanner. NEMA NU4-2008 characterization and a variety of phantom and animal imaging studies to demonstrate the quantitative imaging performance of the PET scanner are presented. Spatial resolution of 1 mm is measured with a filtered-back projection reconstruction algorithm at the center of the scanner and DOI measurement helps maintain the excellent spatial resolution over the entire imaging FOV. An absolute peak sensitivity of 12.4% is measured with a 255-765 keV energy window. The scanner demonstrates good count-rate performance, with a peak NEC of 300 kcps and 160 kcps measured with ~900 µCi in the NEMA mouse and rat phantoms, respectively. Imaging data with the NEMA image quality phantom and Micro Derenzo phantoms demonstrate the ability to achieve good image quality and accurate quantitative data. Image uniformity of 7.4% and spill-over ratio of 8% were measured. The superior spatial resolution, excellent energy resolution and sensitivity also provide superior contrast recovery, with ~70% recovery for the 2 mm rods. While current commercial preclinical PET scanners have spatial resolution in the 1-2 mm range, the 1 mm3 volumetric resolution presents significant improvement over current commercially available preclinical PET scanners. In combination with the X-CUBE scanner it provides the ability to perform fully quantitative imaging with spatially co-registered high-resolution 3D PET-CT images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29938684      PMCID: PMC6145835          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aacec3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  26 in total

1.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Arion F Chatziioannou; Yongfeng Yang; Robert W Silverman; Ken Meadors; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-4 performance evaluation of the PET component of the NanoPET/CT preclinical PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Istvan Szanda; Jane Mackewn; Gergely Patay; Peter Major; Kavitha Sunassee; Gregory E Mullen; Gabor Nemeth; York Haemisch; Philip J Blower; Paul K Marsden
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Performance evaluation of the small-animal PET scanner ClairvivoPET using NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards.

Authors:  K Sato; M Shidahara; H Watabe; S Watanuki; Y Ishikawa; Y Arakawa; Y H Nai; S Furumoto; M Tashiro; T Shoji; K Yanai; K Gonda
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Depth of interaction decoding of a continuous crystal detector module.

Authors:  T Ling; T K Lewellen; R S Miyaoka
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  MR-compatibility assessment of the first preclinical PET-MRI insert equipped with digital silicon photomultipliers.

Authors:  J Wehner; B Weissler; P M Dueppenbecker; P Gebhardt; B Goldschmidt; D Schug; F Kiessling; V Schulz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Quantitative PET and SPECT performance characteristics of the Albira Trimodal pre-clinical tomograph.

Authors:  T J Spinks; D Karia; M O Leach; G Flux
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Performance evaluation of PETbox: a low cost bench top preclinical PET scanner.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Qinan Bao; Nam T Vu; Robert W Silverman; Richard Taschereau; Brittany N Berry-Pusey; Ali Douraghy; Fernando R Rannou; David B Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Performance assessment of a preclinical PET scanner with pinhole collimation by comparison to a coincidence-based small-animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Matthew D Walker; Marlies C Goorden; Katherine Dinelle; Ruud M Ramakers; Stephan Blinder; Maryam Shirmohammad; Frans van der Have; Freek J Beekman; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner.

Authors:  Yuchuan Wang; Jurgen Seidel; Benjamin M W Tsui; Juan J Vaquero; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients.

Authors:  C Burger; G Goerres; S Schoenes; A Buck; A H R Lonn; G K Von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Update on latest advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  A high resolution and high detection efficiency depth-encoding detector for brain positron emission tomography based on a 0.75 mm pitch scintillator array.

Authors:  J Du; S R Cherry
Journal:  J Instrum       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 1.415

3.  Investigation of a Model-based Time-over-threshold Technique for Phoswich Crystal Discrimination.

Authors:  Haithem Bouziri; Catherine M Pepin; Konin Koua; Maher Benhouria; Caroline Paulin; Jinsong Ouyang; Marc Normandin; Jean-François Pratte; Georges El Fakhri; Roger Lecomte; Réjean Fontaine
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-04

4.  A compact and lightweight small animal PET with uniform high-resolution for onboard PET/CT image-guided preclinical radiation oncology research.

Authors:  Xinyi Cheng; Kun Hu; Dongxu Yang; Yiping Shao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.174

5.  Deep residual-convolutional neural networks for event positioning in a monolithic annular PET scanner.

Authors:  Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Peter F Martone; Alexander V Stolin; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Improving Tumor Hypoxia Location in 18F-Misonidazole PET with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Using Quantitative Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Partial Oxygen Pressure Images.

Authors:  Inna Gertsenshteyn; Boris Epel; Eugene Barth; Lara Leoni; Erica Markiewicz; Hsiu-Ming Tsai; Xiaobing Fan; Mihai Giurcanu; Darwin Bodero; Marta Zamora; Subramanian Sundramoorthy; Heejong Kim; Richard Freifelder; Mohammed Bhuiyan; Anna Kucharski; Gregory Karczmar; Chien-Min Kao; Howard Halpern; Chin-Tu Chen
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-03-26

7.  Performance evaluation of the mouse version of the LabPET II PET scanner.

Authors:  Émilie Gaudin; Christian Thibaudeau; Louis Arpin; Jean-Daniel Leroux; Maxime Toussaint; Jean-Francois Beaudoin; Jules Cadorette; Maxime Paillé; Catherine M Pepin; Konin Koua; Jonathan Bouchard; Nicolas Viscogliosi; Caroline Paulin; Réjean Fontaine; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  H2RSPET: a 0.5 mm resolution high-sensitivity small-animal PET scanner, a simulation study.

Authors:  Youfang Lai; Qian Wang; Shiwei Zhou; Zhaoheng Xie; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry; Mingwu Jin; Yujie Chi; Junwei Du
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Improved Detection of Molecular Markers of Atherosclerotic Plaques Using Sub-Millimeter PET Imaging.

Authors:  Jessica Bridoux; Sara Neyt; Pieterjan Debie; Benedicte Descamps; Nick Devoogdt; Frederik Cleeren; Guy Bormans; Alexis Broisat; Vicky Caveliers; Catarina Xavier; Christian Vanhove; Sophie Hernot
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Comments on the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standard on Performance Measurement of Small Animal Positron Emission Tomographs.

Authors:  Patrick Hallen; David Schug; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.