Literature DB >> 34153950

Deep residual-convolutional neural networks for event positioning in a monolithic annular PET scanner.

Gangadhar Jaliparthi1, Peter F Martone1, Alexander V Stolin1, Raymond R Raylman1.   

Abstract

PET scanners based on monolithic pieces of scintillator can potentially produce superior performance characteristics (high spatial resolution and detection sensitivity, for example) compared to conventional PET scanners. Consequently, we initiated development of a preclinical PET system based on a single 7.2 cm long annulus of LYSO, called AnnPET. While this system could facilitate creation of high-quality images, its unique geometry results in optics that can complicate estimation of event positioning in the detector. To address this challenge, we evaluated deep-residual convolutional neural networks (DR-CNN) to estimate the three-dimensional position of annihilation photon interactions. Monte Carlo simulations of the AnnPET scanner were used to replicate the physics, including optics, of the scanner. It was determined that a ten-layer-DR-CNN was most suited to application with AnnPET. The errors between known event positions, and those estimated by this network and those calculated with the commonly used center-of-mass algorithm (COM) were used to assess performance. The mean absolute errors (MAE) for the ten-layer-DR-CNN-based event positions were 0.54 mm, 0.42 mm and 0.45 mm along thex(axial)-,y(transaxial)- andz- (depth-of-interaction) axes, respectively. For COM estimates, the MAEs were 1.22 mm, 1.04 mm and 2.79 mm in thex-,y- andz-directions, respectively. Reconstruction of the network-estimated data with the 3D-FBP algorithm (5 mm source offset) yielded spatial resolutions (full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM)) of 0.8 mm (radial), 0.7 mm (tangential) and 0.71 mm (axial). Reconstruction of the COM-derived data yielded spatial resolutions (FWHM) of 1.15 mm (radial), 0.96 mm (tangential) and 1.14 mm (axial). These findings demonstrated that use of a ten-layer-DR-CNN with a PET scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator has the potential to produce excellent performance compared to standard analytical methods.
© 2021 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; neural networks; radiation detection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34153950      PMCID: PMC8908313          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0d0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  36 in total

1.  STIR: software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2.

Authors:  Kris Thielemans; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Sanida Mustafovic; Tobias Beisel; Pablo Aguiar; Nikolaos Dikaios; Matthew W Jacobson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Design and simulation of a novel method for determining depth-of-interaction in a PET scintillation crystal array using a single-ended readout by a multi-anode PMT.

Authors:  Mikiko Ito; Jae Sung Lee; Min-Jae Park; Kwang-Souk Sim; Seong Jong Hong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Depth of interaction decoding of a continuous crystal detector module.

Authors:  T Ling; T K Lewellen; R S Miyaoka
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A preclinical PET detector constructed with a monolithic scintillator ring.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xu; Siwei Xie; Xi Zhang; Weijie Tao; Jingwu Yang; Zhixiang Zhao; Fenghua Weng; Qiu Huang; Fei Yi; Qiyu Peng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A 32 mm  ×  32 mm  ×  22 mm monolithic LYSO:Ce detector with dual-sided digital photon counter readout for ultrahigh-performance TOF-PET and TOF-PET/MRI.

Authors:  Giacomo Borghi; Bart Jan Peet; Valerio Tabacchini; Dennis R Schaart
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  DigiPET: sub-millimeter spatial resolution small-animal PET imaging using thin monolithic scintillators.

Authors:  Samuel España; Radoslaw Marcinkowski; Vincent Keereman; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Roel Van Holen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  SCOUT: a fast Monte-Carlo modeling tool of scintillation camera output.

Authors:  William C J Hunter; Harrison H Barrett; John P Muzi; Wendy McDougald; Lawrence R MacDonald; Robert S Miyaoka; Thomas K Lewellen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A prototype PET scanner with DOI-encoding detectors.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Yibao Wu; Jinyi Qi; Sara St James; Huini Du; Purushottam A Dokhale; Kanai S Shah; Richard Farrell; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  A validated Geant4 model of a whole-body PET scanner with four-layer DOI detectors.

Authors:  Abdella M Ahmed; Andrew Chacon; Harley Rutherford; Go Akamatsu; Akram Mohammadi; Fumihiko Nishikido; Hideaki Tashima; Eiji Yoshida; Taiga Yamaya; Daniel R Franklin; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Susanna Guatelli; Mitra Safavi-Naeini
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  A convolutional neural network-based system to classify patients using FDG PET/CT examinations.

Authors:  Keisuke Kawauchi; Sho Furuya; Kenji Hirata; Chietsugu Katoh; Osamu Manabe; Kentaro Kobayashi; Shiro Watanabe; Tohru Shiga
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  1 in total

1.  Concept development of an on-chip PET system.

Authors:  Christoph Clement; Gabriele Birindelli; Marco Pizzichemi; Fiammetta Pagano; Marianna Kruithof-De Julio; Sibylle Ziegler; Axel Rominger; Etiennette Auffray; Kuangyu Shi
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-05-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.