Literature DB >> 32928068

The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.

Gregory J Gillispie1, Albert Han1,2,3, Meryem Uzun-Per4, John Fisher5, Antonios G Mikos2,3, Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi4, James J Yoo1, Sang Jin Lee1, Anthony Atala1.   

Abstract

Bioink printability persists as a limiting factor toward many bioprinting applications. Printing parameter selection is largely user-dependent, and the effect of cell density on printability has not been thoroughly investigated. Recently, methods have been developed to give greater insight into printing outcomes. This study aims to further advance those methods and apply them to study the effect of printing parameters (feedrate and flowrate) and cell density on printability. Two printed structures, a crosshatch and five-layer tube, were established as printing standards and utilized to determine the printing outcomes. Acellular bioinks were printed using a testing matrix of feedrates of 37.5, 75, 150, 300, and 600 mm/min and flowrates of 21, 42, 84, 168, and 336 mm3/min. Structures were also printed with cell densities of 5, 10, 20, and 40 × 106 cell/mL at 150 mm/min and 84 mm3/min. Only speed ratios (defined as flowrate divided by feedrate) from 0.07 to 2.24 mm2 were suitable for analysis. Increasing speed ratio dramatically increased the height, width, and wall thickness of tubular structures, but did not influence radial accuracy. For crosshatch structures, the area of pores and the frequency of broken filaments were decreased without impacting pore shape (Pr). Within speed ratios, feedrate and flowrate had negligible, inconsistent effects. Cell density did not affect any printing outcomes despite slight rheological changes. Printing outcomes were dominated by the speed ratio, with feedrate, flowrate, and cell density having little impact on printing outcomes when controlling for speed ratio within the ranges tested. The relevance of these results to other bioinks and printing conditions requires continued investigation by the bioprinting community, as well as highlight speed ratio as a key variable to report and suggest that rheology is a more sensitive measure than printing outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioink; bioprinting; cell density; federate; flowrate; hydrogel; printability

Year:  2020        PMID: 32928068      PMCID: PMC7780841          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  36 in total

1.  Improving viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the design of hydrogel cell carriers.

Authors:  Brian A Aguado; Widya Mulyasasmita; James Su; Kyle J Lampe; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication.

Authors:  Jos Malda; Jetze Visser; Ferry P Melchels; Tomasz Jüngst; Wim E Hennink; Wouter J A Dhert; Jürgen Groll; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Modeling process-induced cell damage in the biodispensing process.

Authors:  Minggan Li; Xiaoyu Tian; Ning Zhu; David J Schreyer; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  3D Bioprinting of Low-Concentration Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy.

Authors:  Jun Yin; Mengling Yan; Yancheng Wang; Jianzhong Fu; Hairui Suo
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  3D Bioprinting of shear-thinning hybrid bioinks with excellent bioactivity derived from gellan/alginate and thixotropic magnesium phosphate-based gels.

Authors:  You Chen; Xiong Xiong; Xin Liu; Rongwei Cui; Chen Wang; Guoru Zhao; Wei Zhi; Mengjie Lu; Ke Duan; Jie Weng; Shuxin Qu; Jianhua Ge
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 6.331

6.  Precise stacking of decellularized extracellular matrix based 3D cell-laden constructs by a 3D cell printing system equipped with heating modules.

Authors:  Geunseon Ahn; Kyung-Hyun Min; Changhwan Kim; Jeong-Seok Lee; Donggu Kang; Joo-Yun Won; Dong-Woo Cho; Jun-Young Kim; Songwan Jin; Won-Soo Yun; Jin-Hyung Shim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Amit Panwar; Lay Poh Tan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Layer-by-layer ultraviolet assisted extrusion-based (UAE) bioprinting of hydrogel constructs with high aspect ratio for soft tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Pei Zhuang; Wei Long Ng; Jia An; Chee Kai Chua; Lay Poh Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting.

Authors:  Vivian H M Mouser; Ferry P W Melchels; Jetze Visser; Wouter J A Dhert; Debby Gawlitta; Jos Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 9.954

10.  3D Printability of Alginate-Carboxymethyl Cellulose Hydrogel.

Authors:  Ahasan Habib; Venkatachalem Sathish; Sanku Mallik; Bashir Khoda
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  4 in total

1.  3D bioprinting of a trachea-mimetic cellular construct of a clinically relevant size.

Authors:  Jeong Hun Park; Minjun Ahn; Sun Hwa Park; Hyeonji Kim; Mihyeon Bae; Wonbin Park; Scott J Hollister; Sung Won Kim; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Bioink Formulation and Machine Learning-Empowered Bioprinting Optimization.

Authors:  Sebastian Freeman; Stefano Calabro; Roma Williams; Sha Jin; Kaiming Ye
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 3.  Trends in Tissue Bioprinting, Cell-Laden Bioink Formulation, and Cell Tracking.

Authors:  Paula Vázquez-Aristizabal; Govindaraj Perumal; Clara García-Astrain; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Ander Izeta
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-04

Review 4.  Advanced 3D-Printing Bioinks for Articular Cartilage Repair.

Authors:  Qiushi Liang; Yuanzhu Ma; Xudong Yao; Wei Wei
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2022-04-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.