Literature DB >> 22914604

Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds.

L A Hockaday1, K H Kang, N W Colangelo, P Y C Cheung, B Duan, E Malone, J Wu, L N Girardi, L J Bonassar, H Lipson, C C Chu, J T Butcher.   

Abstract

The aortic valve exhibits complex three-dimensional (3D) anatomy and heterogeneity essential for the long-term efficient biomechanical function. These are, however, challenging to mimic in de novo engineered living tissue valve strategies. We present a novel simultaneous 3D printing/photocrosslinking technique for rapidly engineering complex, heterogeneous aortic valve scaffolds. Native anatomic and axisymmetric aortic valve geometries (root wall and tri-leaflets) with 12-22 mm inner diameters (ID) were 3D printed with poly-ethylene glycol-diacrylate (PEG-DA) hydrogels (700 or 8000 MW) supplemented with alginate. 3D printing geometric accuracy was quantified and compared using Micro-CT. Porcine aortic valve interstitial cells (PAVIC) seeded scaffolds were cultured for up to 21 days. Results showed that blended PEG-DA scaffolds could achieve over tenfold range in elastic modulus (5.3±0.9 to 74.6±1.5 kPa). 3D printing times for valve conduits with mechanically contrasting hydrogels were optimized to 14 to 45 min, increasing linearly with conduit diameter. Larger printed valves had greater shape fidelity (93.3±2.6, 85.1±2.0 and 73.3±5.2% for 22, 17 and 12 mm ID porcine valves; 89.1±4.0, 84.1±5.6 and 66.6±5.2% for simplified valves). PAVIC seeded scaffolds maintained near 100% viability over 21 days. These results demonstrate that 3D hydrogel printing with controlled photocrosslinking can rapidly fabricate anatomical heterogeneous valve conduits that support cell engraftment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22914604      PMCID: PMC3676672          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  64 in total

1.  Tissue engineering of a trileaflet heart valve-early in vitro experiences with a combined polymer.

Authors:  R Sodian; J S Sperling; D P Martin; U Stock; J E Mayer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  1999-10

2.  Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants.

Authors:  P Dagum; G R Green; F J Nistal; G T Daughters; T A Timek; L E Foppiano; A F Bolger; N B Ingels; D C Miller
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Aortic root dilation prior to valve opening explained by passive hemodynamics.

Authors:  I Vesely
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2000-01

4.  Dynamic mechanical conditioning of collagen-gel blood vessel constructs induces remodeling in vitro.

Authors:  D Seliktar; R A Black; R P Vito; R M Nerem
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Porous scaffold architecture guides tissue formation.

Authors:  Amaia Cipitria; Claudia Lange; Hanna Schell; Wolfgang Wagermaier; Johannes C Reichert; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Peter Fratzl; Georg N Duda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Application of stereolithography for scaffold fabrication for tissue engineered heart valves.

Authors:  Ralf Sodian; Matthias Loebe; Andreas Hein; David P Martin; Simon P Hoerstrup; Evgenij V Potapov; Harald Hausmann; Tim Lueth; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Biomechanical comparison of human pulmonary and aortic roots.

Authors:  Ali N Azadani; Sam Chitsaz; Peter B Matthews; Nicolas Jaussaud; James Leung; Andrew Wisneski; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Hydrogel properties influence ECM production by chondrocytes photoencapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bryant; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-01

9.  The role of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in the remodeling of cell-seeded vascular constructs subjected to cyclic strain.

Authors:  D Seliktar; R M Nerem; Z S Galis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Early in vivo experience with tissue-engineered trileaflet heart valves.

Authors:  R Sodian; S P Hoerstrup; J S Sperling; S Daebritz; D P Martin; A M Moran; B S Kim; F J Schoen; J P Vacanti; J E Mayer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  101 in total

1.  Applications of three-dimensional printing technology in the cardiovascular field.

Authors:  Di Shi; Kai Liu; Xin Zhang; Hang Liao; Xiaoping Chen
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes.

Authors:  James B Hu; Martin L Tomov; Jan W Buikema; Caressa Chen; Morteza Mahmoudi; Sean M Wu; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

Review 3.  Taking a deep look: modern microscopy technologies to optimize the design and functionality of biocompatible scaffolds for tissue engineering in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  M Vielreicher; S Schürmann; R Detsch; M A Schmidt; A Buttgereit; A Boccaccini; O Friedrich
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Polymeric 3D Printed Structures for Soft-Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Scott Stratton; Ohan S Manoukian; Ravi Patel; Adam Wentworth; Swetha Rudraiah; Sangamesh G Kumbar
Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.125

Review 5.  Advances in the design of macroporous polymer scaffolds for potential applications in dentistry.

Authors:  Sidi A Bencherif; Thomas M Braschler; Philippe Renaud
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Outlooks on Three-Dimensional Printing for Ocular Biomaterials Research.

Authors:  Owen S Fenton; Marion Paolini; Jason L Andresen; Florence J Müller; Robert Langer
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  3D-Printed Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Medical Imaging and Computational Validation Applications.

Authors:  Aidan J Cloonan; Danial Shahmirzadi; Ronny X Li; Barry J Doyle; Elisa E Konofagou; Tim M McGloughlin
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.449

8.  Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Teng Gao; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Anil Kumar Pr; Young-Joon Seol; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 9.954

9.  3D Printing of Highly Stretchable and Tough Hydrogels into Complex, Cellularized Structures.

Authors:  Sungmin Hong; Dalton Sycks; Hon Fai Chan; Shaoting Lin; Gabriel P Lopez; Farshid Guilak; Kam W Leong; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  JetValve: Rapid manufacturing of biohybrid scaffolds for biomimetic heart valve replacement.

Authors:  Andrew K Capulli; Maximillian Y Emmert; Francesco S Pasqualini; Debora Kehl; Etem Caliskan; Johan U Lind; Sean P Sheehy; Sung Jin Park; Seungkuk Ahn; Benedikt Weber; Josue A Goss; Simon P Hoerstrup; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.