Literature DB >> 26523399

The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology.

Yu Zhao1, Yang Li, Shuangshuang Mao, Wei Sun, Rui Yao.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell printing technology has provided a versatile methodology to fabricate cell-laden tissue-like constructs and in vitro tissue/pathological models for tissue engineering, drug testing and screening applications. However, it still remains a challenge to print bioinks with high viscoelasticity to achieve long-term stable structure and maintain high cell survival rate after printing at the same time. In this study, we systematically investigated the influence of 3D cell printing parameters, i.e. composition and concentration of bioink, holding temperature and holding time, on the printability and cell survival rate in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology. Rheological measurements were utilized to characterize the viscoelasticity of gelatin-based bioinks. Results demonstrated that the bioink viscoelasticity was increased when increasing the bioink concentration, increasing holding time and decreasing holding temperature below gelation temperature. The decline of cell survival rate after 3D cell printing process was observed when increasing the viscoelasticity of the gelatin-based bioinks. However, different process parameter combinations would result in the similar rheological characteristics and thus showed similar cell survival rate after 3D bioprinting process. On the other hand, bioink viscoelasticity should also reach a certain point to ensure good printability and shape fidelity. At last, we proposed a protocol for 3D bioprinting of temperature-sensitive gelatin-based hydrogel bioinks with both high cell survival rate and good printability. This research would be useful for biofabrication researchers to adjust the 3D bioprinting process parameters quickly and as a referable template for designing new bioinks.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26523399     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  33 in total

Review 1.  Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  C F Marques; G S Diogo; S Pina; J M Oliveira; T H Silva; R L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Teng Gao; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Anil Kumar Pr; Young-Joon Seol; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 3.  Recent advances in high-strength and elastic hydrogels for 3D printing in biomedical applications.

Authors:  Cancan Xu; Guohao Dai; Yi Hong
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.

Authors:  Kaivalya A Deo; Kanwar Abhay Singh; Charles W Peak; Daniel L Alge; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  3D Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Improved Biological Functionality.

Authors:  Sarah M Hull; Lucia G Brunel; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  A Ribeiro; M M Blokzijl; R Levato; C W Visser; M Castilho; W E Hennink; T Vermonden; J Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 7.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Engineering a Chemically Defined Hydrogel Bioink for Direct Bioprinting of Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Michael Ward; Dylan J Richards; Hai Yao; Michael J Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.988

9.  Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting.

Authors:  Vivian H M Mouser; Ferry P W Melchels; Jetze Visser; Wouter J A Dhert; Debby Gawlitta; Jos Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 10.  Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering.

Authors:  Cooper Blake; Oliver Massey; Mitchell Boyd-Moss; Kate Firipis; Aaqil Rifai; Stephanie Franks; Anita Quigley; Robert Kapsa; David R Nisbet; Richard J Williams
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.