Literature DB >> 29911662

Clinical Features of Chromosome 6 Translocation in Male Carriers: A Report of 10 Cases and Review of the Literature.

Xiao Yang1, Hongguo Zhang1, Yang Yu1, Haibo Zhu1, Xiaonan Hu1, Yuting Jiang1, Ruixue Wang1, Ruizhi Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The literature indicates that chromosome 6 is involved in balanced translocation and is involved in reproductive failure. This aim of this study was to explore the clinical features of chromosome 6 translocation in male carriers. MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified 10 patients who were carriers of chromosome 6 translocations and excluded the patients with varicocele, ejaculatory duct obstruction, and the other cause of infertility. The karyotype was analyzed using G-banding. A search for translocations on chromosome 6 involved in male infertility was performed using PubMed. We included cases of balanced chromosome 6 translocations involving adult men of fertile age and excluded those cases of live-born children, or those without breakpoints involving chromosome 6, or those with complex chromosomal translocations or chimeras. RESULTS All 10 patients underwent genetic counseling for infertility. Semen analysis showed that 1 case had azoospermia, while 9 cases exhibited normal semen criteria. The respective partners of the 9 cases with normal semen parameters had a tendency to miscarry: 3 experienced spontaneous and induced abortion because of abnormal embryos; 3 experienced 3 incidents of spontaneous abortion, 2 experienced double spontaneous abortion, and 1 experienced biochemical pregnancy on 3 occasions. Most of the chromosome 6 breakpoints in translocation carriers obtained by the PubMed search were associated with spontaneous abortion. CONCLUSIONS Chromosome translocations involving chromosome 6 influence fertility status and lead to increased risk of miscarriage. Cytogenetic screening before opting for assisted reproductive technology and the breakpoints of chromosome 6 translocation should be considered for infertile male carriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29911662      PMCID: PMC6038718          DOI: 10.12659/MSM.911170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Male-factor infertility is implicated in half of infertile couples [1]. Chromosomal aberrations are one of the most common causes of male infertility [2] and chromosomal disorders in non-obstructive azoospermia affect spermatogenesis [3]. The literature has demonstrated that structural chromosomal abnormalities in males can lead to abnormal sperm concentrations, influence fertility status, and lead to an increased risk of miscarriage [4-6]. Reduced fertility or a spouse experiencing recurrent miscarriage is the most common feature for the carriers of balanced translocations [7]. The specific chromosomes and breakpoints involved in translocations play an important role [7,8]. In some carriers, the location of a translocation breakpoint is closely related to an important gene, thus leading to spermatogenesis failure [9,10]. Previous studies indicate that chromosome 6 is involved in balanced translocation and is associated with reproductive failure [11-13]. There are important genes located on chromosome 6 that are associated with the complex and vital process of spermatogenesis. For example, the activator of cAMP-responsive element modulator in testis (ACT) gene was mapped to chromosome 6q16.1–16.3 and may be associated with the differentiation of spermatids into mature spermatozoa [14]. Furthermore, the sperm acrosomal membrane-associated protein 32 gene (SAMP32) located on chromosome 6q15–16.2 encodes a testis-specific protein that is involved in binding of sperm to the oocyte complex [15]. Genetic variants located within the human leukocyte antigen, Class II, DR alpha (HLA-DRA) region at 6p21.32 have been identified as risk factors for non-obstructive azoospermia [16]. Several previous publications by our group described the clinical features and genetic counseling of male patients with translocation breakpoints in chromosome 3, 4, and 5 [17-19]. This aim of this study was to explore the clinical features of chromosome 6 translocation in male carriers and genetic counseling for infertile carriers for these genetic anomalies.

Material and Methods

Subjects

Between July 2010 and December 2015, we recruited 5235 males experiencing infertility or receiving counseling from the Outpatient Department at the Center for Reproductive Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. This study included all translocation cases involving chromosome 6 and excluded patients with varicocele, ejaculatory duct obstruction, and the other cause of infertility. For all patients, a clinical questionnaire, physical examination, and semen analysis were used according to previously described methods [20]. Their spouses had normal hormone levels. Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, and Ureaplasma detection was negative for these infertile couples. Abortions due to the female factor were excluded. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Cytogenetic analysis

Cytogenetic analysis was carried out for all patients. The protocol of blood sample collection, lymphocyte culture, chromosome preparation, and karyotype analysis were performed using previously described methods [20].

Analysis of identified balanced reciprocal translocations breakpoints

Balanced reciprocal translocations identified in chromosome 6 from infertile males were searched using PubMed on December 8, 2016. The keywords for PubMed searches were “chromosome/translocation/sperm” and “chromosome/translocation/abortion”. We included cases of balanced chromosome 6 translocations involving adult fertile-age men, and excluded those cases of live born children, or those without breakpoints involving chromosome 6, or those with complex chromosomal translocations, and chimeras. The relationships of translocation breakpoints with male infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss were analyzed.

Results

A total of 82 balanced reciprocal translocations carriers were detected among the 5235 male patients recruited for this study. Of these 82 translocation carriers, 10 patients (10/82; 12.2%) were carriers of a chromosome 6 translocation. The karyotypes obtained from these 10 cases are shown in Figure 1. All 10 patients underwent genetic counseling for infertility (mean age=32.8±4.9 years, normal phenotype). Testicular size was normal on physical examination. Semen analysis showed that 1 patient had azoospermia while 9 showed normal semen criteria. Of the 9 with normal semen parameters, their partners were able to conceive but experienced abortion: 3 partners experienced spontaneous and induced abortion because of abnormal embryos; 3 experienced 3 incidents of spontaneous abortion, 2 experienced double spontaneous abortion, and 1 experienced biochemical pregnancy on 3 occasions. The breakpoint at 6q15 was associated with pre-gestational infertility, while other breakpoints were related to gestational cases. Karyotype results from the 10 patients expressing chromosome 6 translocations are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1

Partial karyotypes of the 10 cases possessing chromosome 6 translocations.

Table 1

Clinical and cytogenetic features of chromosome 6 translocation carriers.

Infertility typeSperm concentration (×106/ml)KaryotypeKaryotype of spouseFrequency of abortionFigure No.
Pregestational046,XY,t(6;7)(q15;p15)46,XXNil1A
Gestational2746,XY,t(2;6)(q21;p21)46,XX3 biochemical pregnancies1B
4446,XY,t(3;6)(q21;q25)46,XX2 spontaneous and 2 induced abortion of abnormal embryos1C
4946,XY,t(3;6)(q12;q27)46,XX2 spontaneous abortions1D
6146,XY,t(3;6)(q10;q10)46,XX2 spontaneous abortions1E
4246,XY,t(6;7)(q25;p15)46,XX3 spontaneous abortions1F
9946,XY,t(6;7)(q13;p15)46,XX3 spontaneous abortions1G
3646,XY,t(6;8)(p21;q24)46,XX2 spontaneous and 1 induced abortion of abnormal embryos1H
4646,XY,t(6;9)(q26;p13)46,XX3 spontaneous abortions1I
3246,XY,t(6;22)(q27;q13)46,XX1 spontaneous and 1 induced abortion of abnormal embryos1J
Table 1 also shows that breakpoints at locations 6p21, 6q25, and 6q27 were observed more than once. The breakpoints at 6p21, 6q10, 6q13, 6q25, 6q26, and 6q27 were associated with gestational infertility. Most of the chromosome 6 breakpoints in translocation carriers obtained in the PubMed search were associated with spontaneous abortion (Table 2). Analysis of previous reports showed that carriers of chromosome 6q15 exhibited pre-gestational infertility, while the carriers of the other breakpoints exhibited gestational infertility.
Table 2

Clinical features and chromosome 6 breakpoints in translocation carriers reported in previous literature*.

KaryotypeBreakpointsClinical findingsReference
t(1;6)1q44; 6p11AbortionVozdova et al., 2013 [11]
t(1;6)1q25; 6q16InfertilityGadaSaxena et al., 2012 [29]
t(2;6)2q34; 6p24Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy lossGadaSaxena et al., 2012 [29]
t(3;6)3q25.3; 6q11.2Recurrent fetal wastageFryns et al, 1998 [30]
t(3;6)3q28; 6q13InfertilityMierla et al., 2015 [31]
t(3; 6)3q29; 6q21Recurrent pregnancy lossKochhar et al, 2013 [32]
t(4;6)4q31.3; 6q21Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy lossGadaSaxena et al., 2012 [29]
t(4;6)4q33; 6q27Asthenospermia, abortionVozdova et al., 2013 [11]
t(4;6)4q31.3; 6q21Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy lossGadaSaxena et al., 2012 [29]
t(4;6)4q23; 6q21Repeated spontaneous abortionGhazaey et al., 2015 [26]
t(5;6)5p13.3; 6q27Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy lossGadaSaxena et al., 2012 [29]
t(6;7)6p22;7q22Four spontaneous abortionsResim et al., 2013 [33]
t(6;7)6p22; 7q34Recurrent fetal wastageFryns et al, 1998 [30]
t(6;7)6q25; 7q34AbortionVozdova et al., 2013 [11]
t(6;7)6q15; 7p15Recurrent spontaneous abortionZhang et al., 2015 [13]
t(6;8)6p21; 8q24Recurrent spontaneous abortionZhang et al., 2015 [13]
t(6;8)6q21.3; 8q23.2Recurrent fetal wastageFryns et al, 1998 [30]
t(6;8)6q26; 8p12NormozoospermiaGodo et al., 2013 [8]
t(6;8)6q13; 8p12Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy lossGadaSaxena et al., 2012 [29]
t(6;8)6p23; 8q12.2Repeated spontaneous abortionGhazaey et al., 2015 [26]
t(6;9)6q26; 9p13Recurrent spontaneous abortionZhang et al., 2015 [13]
t(6;10)6p21;10q26Two previous miscarriagesVasilevska et al,. 2013 [34]
t(6;10)6p25; 10p11.2Repeated spontaneous abortionGhazaey et al., 2015 [26]
t(6;10)6q23; 10p13Early pregnancy lossLi et al., 2012 [24]
t(6;11)6q15; 11p15OligoazoospermiaPernice et al., 2002 [9]
t(6;11)6p12.1; 11q25Recurrent spontaneous abortionCelep et al., 2006 [35]
t(6;14)6q13; 14p10OligoazoospermiaLi et al., 2012 [24]
t(6;14)6q24.2; 14q24.2AbortionVozdova et al., 2013 [11]
t(6;15)6p21; 15q26.1Recurrent fetal wastageFryns et al, 1998 [30]
t(6;15)6q25; 15q14Recurrent spontaneous pregnancy lossGadaSaxena et al., 2012 [29]
t(6;16)6q26; 16p12Repeated spontaneous abortionGhazaey et al., 2015 [26]
t(6;21)6p21.1;21p13AzoospermiaPaoloni-Giacobino et al., 2000 [25]

All breakpoints were listed from 6pter to 6qter to facilitate easy search of the publication.

Discussion

Whole-exome sequencing and array-comparative genome hybridization analyses have been increasingly applied in many medical fields in recent years, but these technologies fail to detect balanced reciprocal translocations or inversions, which sometimes have very detrimental effects on gene structure and function [21]. In contrast, karyotype analysis easily detects balanced reciprocal translocations and remains a powerful and cheap technological method [21]. This technology thus represents a powerful diagnostic tool and provides valuable information for genetic counseling of infertile males [22]. Balanced reciprocal translocation is one of the major chromosomal abnormalities in male infertility [6]. The incidence of balanced reciprocal translocation was reported to be approximately 1 in 625 (0.16%) in the general population [23]. In the present study, the frequency of balanced reciprocal translocations in infertile males was 1.57% (82/5235). Therefore, the incidence of balanced translocations was about 10 times higher in infertile men than in the general population. In clinical practice, pre-gestational and gestational infertility are distinguished in infertile male patients [24]. Pre-gestational infertility patients exhibit abnormal semen parameters and their partners are not able to conceive. Gestational cases have partners who are able to conceive but have miscarriages. In particular, chromosome 6 translocation has often been associated with male infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss [12,25,26]. In the present study, 10 of our cases were identified as carriers of chromosome 6 translocations. Our findings showed the carriers of chromosome 6q15 exhibited pre-gestational infertility, while the carriers of the other breakpoints exhibited gestational infertility. Ni et al. [27] reported that low-frequency germline variants across locations 6p21.33 to 6p22.2 were associated with non-obstructive azoospermia in Han Chinese men, and disrupted the process of spermatogenesis. This finding is supported by the fact that the zinc finger gene ZNF165, which is mapped to 6p21, and the SAMP32 gene, mapped to 6q15–16.2, are both specifically expressed in the testes [15,28]. The carriers of the breakpoints at 6q13, 6q25, 6q26, and 6q27 had partners who had recurrent pregnancy loss. These results are consistent with previous reports [8,11,13,26,29]. In the literature, the breakpoints at 6p24, 6p23, 6p22, 6p21, 6p12.1, 6p11, 6q11.2, 6q13, 6q21.3, 6q21 6q25, 6q26, and 6q27 were associated with fetal abortion [11,26,29-35], and the breakpoints at 6q13, 6q15, and 6q21.1 were associated with oligoazoospermia or azoospermia [9,24,25]. Hence, it is noteworthy that another breakpoint involving balanced translocation should be considered in these pre-gestational individuals. In genetic counseling, physicians should consider different breakpoints and different reproductive treatment options for the carriers of chromosome 6 translocations. Studies have shown that key genes associated with spermatogenesis are predominantly located on 6p21–22 and 6q15–16 [15,27,28]. Male patients with chromosome 6 breakpoints and pre-gestational infertility should be counseled regarding the potential application of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, males with gestational infertility and their partners at risk of recurrent pregnancy loss should be counseled regarding the potential use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) or prenatal diagnosis [11]. The limitations of this study included the small number of carriers of chromosome 6 translocations and the fact that we did not assess the specific molecular effects of the translocations we identified. However, this study is clinically useful because it provides additional information for male carriers of chromosome 6 translocation when seeking reproductive therapy.

Conclusions

We identified 10 patients who were carriers of chromosome 6 translocations. Combined with previous reports, the analysis of our new cases indicated that the breakpoints identified at location 6q15 exhibited pre-gestational infertility, while the other breakpoints exhibited gestational infertility. Chromosome translocations involving chromosome 6 influence fertility status and lead to an increased risk of miscarriage. Cytogenetic screening before opting for assisted reproductive technology and the breakpoints of chromosome 6 translocation should be considered for infertile male carriers.
  35 in total

1.  Karyotype is not dead (yet)!

Authors:  Laurent Pasquier; Mélanie Fradin; Elouan Chérot; Dominique Martin-Coignard; Estelle Colin; Hubert Journel; Florence Demurger; Linda Akloul; Chloé Quélin; Vincent Jauffret; Josette Lucas; Marc-Antoine Belaud-Rotureau; Sylvie Odent; Sylvie Jaillard
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Karyotype analysis in large sample cases from Shenyang Women's and Children's hospital: a study of 16,294 male infertility patients.

Authors:  M Gao; H Pang; Y-H Zhao; J Hua; D Tong; H Zhao; Y Liu; Y Zhao; M Zhang; X-J Yan; H Chen; H-P Ma; T-Y Jin; S-L Dong
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.775

3.  Cloning and expression of activator of CREM in testis in human testicular tissue.

Authors:  I Palermo; L Litrico; G Emmanuele; V Giuffrida; P Sassone-Corsi; D De Cesare; G Maria Fimia; R D'Agata; A E Calogero; S Travali
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Low-frequency germline variants across 6p22.2-6p21.33 are associated with non-obstructive azoospermia in Han Chinese men.

Authors:  Bixian Ni; Yuan Lin; Liangdan Sun; Meng Zhu; Zheng Li; Hui Wang; Jun Yu; Xuejiang Guo; Xianbo Zuo; Jing Dong; Yankai Xia; Yang Wen; Hao Wu; Honggang Li; Yong Zhu; Ping Ping; Xiangfeng Chen; Juncheng Dai; Yue Jiang; Peng Xu; Qiang Du; Bing Yao; Ning Weng; Hui Lu; Zhuqing Wang; Xiaobin Zhu; Xiaoyu Yang; Chenliang Xiong; Hongxia Ma; Guangfu Jin; Jianfeng Xu; Xinru Wang; Zuomin Zhou; Jiayin Liu; Xuejun Zhang; Donald F Conrad; Zhibin Hu; Jiahao Sha
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Balanced chromosomal translocation of chromosomes 6 and 7: a rare male factor of spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  Sefa Resim; Ateş Kadıoğlu; Tolga Akman; Ayşe Gül Bayrak; Erkan Efe
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Complex chromosomal rearrangements in couples affected by recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Taro Nonaka; Izumi Ooki; Takayuki Enomoto; Koichi Takakuwa
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 7.  Chromosomal disorders and male infertility.

Authors:  Gary L Harton; Helen G Tempest
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Nonrobertsonian translocation t(6;11) is associated with infertility in an oligoazoospermic male.

Authors:  Francesco Pernice; Giuseppa Mazza; Domenico Puglisi; Maria Giuseppa Luppino; Nicola Frisina
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Translocation breakpoints of chromosome 3 in male carriers: a report of twelve cases and a review of the literature

Authors:  Hongguo Zhang; Ruixue Wang; Linlin Li; Haibo Zhu; Hao Zhang; Ruizhi Liu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 0.973

10.  Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in infertile couples in romania.

Authors:  D Mierla; M Malageanu; R Tulin; D Albu
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 0.519

View more
  3 in total

1.  Chronic Exposure to Cadmium Induces Differential Methylation in Mice Spermatozoa.

Authors:  Wesley N Saintilnord; Sara Y N Tenlep; Joshua D Preston; Eleonora Duregon; Jason E DeRouchey; Jason M Unrine; Rafael de Cabo; Kevin J Pearson; Yvonne N Fondufe-Mittendorf
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Clinical Features of Infertile Men Carrying a Chromosome 9 Translocation.

Authors:  Ruixue Wang; Yang Yu; Qiyuan Wang; Yuting Jiang; Linlin Li; Haibo Zhu; Ruizhi Liu; Hongguo Zhang
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-11-10

3.  Case report: A non-obstructive azoospermia patient with heat shock factor-2 mutation.

Authors:  Haiyue Zhao; Hongguo Zhang; Qi Xi; Leilei Li; Haibo Zhu; Xiaonan Hu; Ruizhi Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.