Literature DB >> 31737790

Clinical Features of Infertile Men Carrying a Chromosome 9 Translocation.

Ruixue Wang1, Yang Yu1, Qiyuan Wang2, Yuting Jiang1, Linlin Li1, Haibo Zhu1, Ruizhi Liu1, Hongguo Zhang1.   

Abstract

Previous studies indicated that chromosome 9 translocations are involved in reduced male fertility and increased chance of miscarriage in the female partner. The aim of this study was to review the clinical features and genetic counselling requirements of infertile men carrying chromosome 9 translocations. This study analyzed fertile-age male carriers of chromosome 9 translocations, and included 12 clinical cases in our hospital. In our cases, three cases had oligozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia, while nine cases had normal semen. Of the latter nine cases, seven were associated with recurrent spontaneous abortions, and two produced a phenotypically normal child as confirmed by amniocentesis. Male chromosome 9 translocations and specific breakpoints from reported papers were searched using PubMed and CNKI database. A literature review identified 76 male patients who carried chromosome 9 translocations. Breakpoints at 9p12, 9p11, 9p10 and 9q34.1 were related to pregestational infertility, while breakpoints at 9p21, 9q10, 9q11, 9q13, 9q21.1, 9q22, 9q22.2, 9q22.3, 9q34, 9q34.2 and 9q34.3 exhibited gestational infertility. Chromosome translocations involving chromosome 9 lead to increased risk of miscarriage. Carriers of chromosome 9 translocations should be counselled to consider in vitro fertilization accompanied by preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
© 2019 Ruixue Wang et al, published by De Gruyter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breakpoint; Chromosomal translocation; Chromosome 9; Genetic counselling; Male infertility

Year:  2019        PMID: 31737790      PMCID: PMC6843491          DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Med (Wars)


Introduction

Balanced reciprocal translocations are structural chromosomal abnormalities. Male carriers may have high rates of genetically unbalanced spermatozoa and exhibit impaired spermatogenesis, associated with frequent unbalanced embryos, male infertility or increased miscarriages [1, 2, 3]. However, clinical cases of normal male fertility with no history of related abortion can also be found for individuals with balanced translocations. Additionally, although in vitro fertilization accompanied by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) increased the chance of translocation carriers fathering a healthy child [4], some studies suggested that PGD did not make better for live birth rate and repeated miscarriage of couples with balanced translocations [5,6]. Natural conception is still a possible option for these carriers’ couples [7,8]. Hence, genetic counselling remains a challenge for carriers of balanced translocations. Recently, we reported and reviewed the relationship between translocation breakpoints of chromosomes 2, 3, 5, and 6, and infertility for male carriers [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Previous studies indicated that chromosome 9 translocations are involved in reduced male fertility and increased chance of miscarriage in the female partner [4,14,15]. The chromosomes and specific breakpoints involved in the translocation are closely related to reproductive abnormalities [16,17]. Chromosomal translocation can increase the frequency of spermatozoa carrying an abnormal chromosome constitution, and some translocation breakpoints can disrupt important genes involved in spermatogenesis [10]. Testis-specific protein kinase 1 gene (TESK1) is located on chromosome 9p13.3 and is specifically expressed in testicular germ cells [18]. Thioredoxin domain-containing protein 8 gene (TXNDC8), mapped to chromosome 9q31.3, may be associated with late sperm maturation [19]. Additionally, chromosome 9 was the first chromosome found to be frequently associated with infertile patients [20]. Understanding the breakpoints on chromosome 9 with respect to providing genetic counselling for male infertility warrants further research. The aim of this study is to identify potential correlations between clinical characteristics of male infertility and carriers of specific translocation breakpoints in chromosome 9.

Methods

Twelve male carriers of chromosome 9 translocations experiencing infertility or receiving counselling were recruited from the outpatient’s department at the Center for Reproductive Medicine, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China between July 2010 and December 2017. This study included all translocation cases involving chromosome 9, and excluded the patients with varicocele, ejaculatory duct obstruction and the other cause of infertility. Each patient underwent semen and cytogenetic analysis. Abortions due to the female factor were excluded. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University, and written informed consent was provided by each patient. For each patient, a semen sample obtained by masturbation after 3-7 days of abstinence was allowed to liquefy at room temperature, and was then analyzed using standard techniques recommended by the World Health Organization guidelines. Patients with oligozoospermia were diagnosed with a sperm count less than 15×106/ml in their last three semen samples (taken at intervals of 1–3 weeks). Oligozoospermia and severe oligozoospermia were defined as previously described [2]. Chromosome preparations were obtained from lymphocyte cultures derived from each patient. Karyotype analysis after G-banding of metaphase chromosomes followed our previously reported methods [11]. Male chromosome 9 translocations and specific breakpoints from reported papers were searched using PubMed, Google Scholar and CNKI database. The search keywords were “chromosome/ translocation/sperm” and “chromosome/translocation/ abortion”. This study included male cases of adult fertile-age, and excluded females and newborns carriers, those with complex chromosomal translocations, chimeras or bone marrow detection, and other cases without breakpoints involving chromosome 9 in the reported papers.

Results

This study clinically examined a total of 12 men with chromosome 9 translocations. Karyotype results and G-banding karyotypes from these 12 patients are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, respectively. Three cases had oligozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia (pregestational infertility), while nine cases had normal semen. Of the former three cases, the carrier with t(1; 9) (p32; p24) showed oligozoospermia, and the other two carriers manifested severe oligozoospermia. After genetic counselling and informed consent, the use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with PGD should be carefully considered for these patients. Of the latter nine cases, it was evident that the carriers’ wife had a tendency to miscarry (gestational infertility); two cases with t(3;9)(q21;q22) and t(8;9)(q24;q32) produced a phenotypically normal child as confirmed by amniocentesis, respectively, and the other seven cases had experienced recurrent miscarriage. For these patients, PGD or prenatal diagnosis should be considered to improve pregnancy rates and reduce abortion rates.
Table 1

Karyotypes of chromosome 9 translocation carriers and their clinical features

Infertility typeClinical findingsKaryotypeFigure No.
PregestationalOligozoospermia or severe oligozo- ospermia46,XY,t(1;9)(p22;p24)Figure 1a
46,XY,t(1;9)(p32;p24)Figure 1b
46,XY,t(9;15)(p13;q11)Figure 1c
GestationalNormal sperm density; a history of miscarriage or Natural pregnancy46,XY,t(1;9)(p36;q32)Figure 1d
46,XY,t(3;9)(q21;q22)Figure 1e
46,XY,t(4;9)(q35;p13)Figure 1f
46,XY,t(6;9)(q26;p13)Figure 1g
46,XY,t(8;9)(q24;q32)Figure 1h
46,XY,t(5;9)(p13;q22)Figure 1i
46,XY,t(7;9)(p10;q10)Figure 1j
46,XY,t(9;15)(p24;q22)Figure 1k
46,XY,t(9;10)(q21;q22)Figure 1l
Figure 1

G-banding karyotypes of the 12 cases identified as possessing chromosome 9 translocations. a: t(1;9) (p22;p24); b: t(1;9) (p32;p24); c: t(9;15) (p13;q11); d: t(1;9); e: t(3;9); f: t(4;9); g: t(6;9); h: t(8;9); i: t(5;9); j: t(7;9); k: t(9;15) (p24;q22); l: t(9;10).

G-banding karyotypes of the 12 cases identified as possessing chromosome 9 translocations. a: t(1;9) (p22;p24); b: t(1;9) (p32;p24); c: t(9;15) (p13;q11); d: t(1;9); e: t(3;9); f: t(4;9); g: t(6;9); h: t(8;9); i: t(5;9); j: t(7;9); k: t(9;15) (p24;q22); l: t(9;10). Karyotypes of chromosome 9 translocation carriers and their clinical features From a review of the literature, clinical feature, karyotype, and specific breakpoints on chromosome 9 were collected and are summarized in Table 2. The reported paper included 76 carriers of chromosome 9 translocations. Combined with the 12 cases reported in this study, chromosome 1 (11 cases) is the most frequently involved with chromosome 9 translocation. In cases of male infertility, the distribution of other chromosomes involved in the translocation with chromosome 9 is shown in Figure 2. The distribution suggests that balanced translocation is closely related to male fertility, and multiple breakpoints on chromosome 1 are involved in these translocations. However, chromosome 11 was not found to be involved in translocation with chromosome 9.
Table 2

Breakpoints in chromosome 9 translocation carriers and clinical features reported in previous literature

CasesKaryotypeBreakpointsClinical findingsReference
1t(1;9)1q11;9p24severe oligozoospermiaYoshida et al., 1997 [75]
2t(1;9)1q43; 9p23OligoasthenozoospermiaPerrin et al., 2013 [45]
3t(1;9)1q11; 9p13Azoospermia or severe oligozoospermiaMierla et al., 2014 [14]
4t(1;9)1q12; 9q13PGDZhang et al., 2014 [81]
5t(1;9)1q23; 9q22.3Recurrent miscarriageDutta et al., 2011 [38]
6t(1;9)1q42.3; 9q22.3Recurrent miscarriageSugiura-Ogasawara., 2008[56]
7t(1;9)1q22; 9q31InfertilityMartin, 1992 [61]
8t(1;9)1p32.1; 9q34.3Normal sperm countMatsuda et al., 1992 [36]
9t(2;9)2q21; 9p22InfertilityMartin et al., 1990 [60]
10t(2;9)2q32; 9q31ICSIGekas et al., 2001 [52]
11t(2;9)2q33; 9q34PGDFindikli et al., 2003 [51]
12t(2;9)2q37; 9q222 fetal lossesAdamoli et al., 1986 [42]
13t(2;9)2q37.3; 9q12Normal semenDul et al., 2012 [54]
14t(3;9)3p25; 9q32InfertilityHonda et al., 1999 [64]
15t(3;9)3q21; 9q34PGDFindikli et al., 2003 [51]
16t(3;9)3q26.2; 9q32InfertilityHonda et al., 1999 [64]
17t(3;9)3q28; 9q32Azoospermia or severe oligozoospermiaMierla et al., 2014 [14]
18t(4;9)4p15.2; 9p13Recurrent spontaneous abortionsCelep et al., 2006 [78]
19t(4;9)4q23.2; 9q22.3Recurrent pregnancy lossKochhar et al., 2013 [15]
20t(4;9)4q25; 9p22InfertilityMoretti et al., 2009 [73]
21t(4;9)4q31.1; 9p24Recurrent spontaneous abortionsCelep et al., 2006 [78]
22t(5;9)5p15.1; 9q22.1Primary infertilityVozdova et al., 2013 [4]
23t(5;9)5p13; 9q22PGDZhang et al., 2014 [81]
24t(5;9)5p12; 9p11InfertilityPellestor et al., 2001 [66]
25t(5;9)5q10; 9q10InfertilityRouen et al., 2017 [35]
26t(5;9)5q23.2; 9q22.3Spontaneous abortionStephenson et al., 2006 [48]
27t(5;9)5q23.3; 9p24Repeated miscarriagesIyer et al., 2007 [55]
28t(6;9)6p12; 9q13PGD, No pregnancyEscudero et al., 2003 [76]
29t(7;9)7p15.2; 9q34.1Primary infertilityVozdova et al., 2013 [4]
30t(7;9)7p14.2; 9q32Recurrent miscarriagePundir et al., 2016 [57]
31t(7;9)7p13; 9p23ICSIGekas et al., 2001 [52]
32t(7;9)7p13; 9q21TeratozoospermiaRouen et al., 2013[39]
33t(7;9)7q31; 9q34Early miscarriageOlszewska et al., 2017 [43]
34t(7;9)7q33; 9p21InfertilityPellestor et al., 1997 [63]
35t(7;9)7q36.2; 9p21.2Normal semenWiland et al., 2008 [74]
36t(8;9)8p21; 9p24Spontaneous abortionsBourrouillou et al., 1986 [47]
37t(8;9)8p21; 9q34Early miscarriageOlszewska et al., 2017 [43]
38t(8;9)8q24.2; 9q32InfertilityEstop et al., 1998 [68]
39t(8;9)8q24.3; 9p21.2Severe oligozoospermia;Olszewska et al., 2017 [43]
40t(8;9)8q24.2; 9q32InfertilityEstop et al., 2000 [65]
41t(8;9)8q24.3; 9p24InfertilityFerfouri et al., 2013 [71]
42t(9;10)9q11; 10p11.1Repetitive abortionsRives et al., 2003 [67]
43t(9;10)9q12; 10q26Azoospermia or severe oligozoospermiaMierla et al., 2014 [14]
44t(9;10)9q34; 10q11InfertilityMartin, 1988 [59]
45t(9;10)9q34.3; 10q24.1PGDKo et al., 2010 [40]
46t(9;12)9p22; 12q22Recurrent fetal wastageFryns et al., 1998 [79]
47t(9;13)9p23; 13q21.1PGDKo et al., 2010 [40]
48t(9;13)9q21.1; 13q21.2InfertilityMartin et al., 1995 [62]
49t(9;13)9q31; 13q34Recurrent pregnancy lossKochhar et al., 2013 [15]
50t(9;13)9q32; 13q32Recurrent miscarriageSugiura-Ogasawara., 2008 [56]
51t(9;14)9p13; 14q13Normal semenWiland et al., 2008 [74]
52t(9;14)9q22.1; 14q12InfertilityGada Saxena et al., 2012 [80]
53t(9;14)9q32; 14p11.2Severe oligozoospermiaBrugnon et al., 2006 [49]
54t(9;15)9p10; 15q10OligoasthenoteratozoospermiaAydos et al., 2006 [72]
55t(9;15)9q32; 15q24Multiple AbortionsCastle et al., 1988 [41]
56t(9;16)9q34.2; 16p12Normal semenDouet-Guilbert et al.,2005 [50]
57t(9;17)9p13; 17q21.3Normal sperm countPerrin et al., 2009 [77]
58t(9;17)9p13; 17q21.3InfertilityBenet et al., 2005 [70]
59t(9;17)9p12; 17q24OligozoospermiaAntonelli et al., 2000 [46]
60t(9;17)9q12; 17p12InfertilityBenet et al., 2005 [70]
61t(9;17)9q21; 17p11.2PGD, DeliveryKyu Lim et al., 2004 [37]
62t(9;17)9q22; 17p13Normal semenBrugnon et al., 2006 [49]
63t(9;17)9q22.1; 17p13.1Repeated spontaneous abortionsGhazaey et al., 2015 [3]
64t(9;18)9p12; 18q12.1InfertilityPellestor et al., 1989 [44]
65t(9;18)9q22.2; 18p11.31Recurrent miscarriagePundir et al., 2016 [57]
66t(9;18)9q32; 18q23Recurrent miscarriagePundir et al., 2016 [57]
67t(9;19)9q10; 19p10Increased aneuploid spermGodo et al., 2013 [17]
68t(9;19)9q10; 19p10Not recordedAnton et al., 2008 [53]
69t(9;20)9p24; 20q13.1Oligozoospermia and astenozoospermiaAnton et al., 2008 [53]
70t(9;20)9q13.4;20p11.2Normal sperm countYoshida et al., 1997 [75]
71t(9;21)9p21; 21q22Recurrent abortionGaboon et al., 2015 [58]
72t(9;21)9p13; 21q22.1PGDZhang et al., 2014 [81]
73t(9;21)9q11; 21q10IVFFindikli et al., 2003 [51]
74t(9;22)9q21; 22q11.2Oligospermia and asthenospermiaPerrin et al., 2009 [77]
75t(9;22)9q21; 22q11.2OligozoospermiaDouet-Guilbert et al.,2005 [50]
76t(9;22)9q21; 22q11.2InfertilityMorel et al., 2004 [69]
Figure 2

Distribution of chromosomes involved in translocations with chromosome 9.

Distribution of chromosomes involved in translocations with chromosome 9. Breakpoints in chromosome 9 translocation carriers and clinical features reported in previous literature The breakpoints at 9q32, 9p24 and 9p13 were observed in 12 cases (13.6%), 10 cases (11.4%) and 9 cases (10.2%) respectively. The breakpoints at 9p12, 9p11, 9p10 and 9q34.1 were related to pregestational infertility, while breakpoints at 9p21, 9q10, 9q11, 9q13, 9q21.1, 9q22, 9q22.2, 9q22.3, 9q34, 9q34.2 and 9q34.3 exhibited gestational infertility. Other breakpoints were found with cases of either pregestational or gestational infertility (Table 3).
Table 3

Incidence of breakpoints on chromosome 9

BreakpointsNumber of patients with pre-gestational infertilityNumber of p atients with gestational infertilityTotal (%)
p245510(11.4%)
p23213(3.4%)
p22213(3.4%)
p21.2112(2.3%)
p2122(2.3%)
p13279(10.2%)
p1222(2.3%)
p1111(1.1%)
p1011(1.1%)
q1033(3.4%)
q1122(2.3%)
q12123(3.4%)
q1322(2.3%)
q13.411(1.1%)
q21426(6.8%)
q21.111(1.1%)
q2255(5.7%)
q22.1123(3.4%)
q22.211(1.1%)
q22.344(4.5%)
q31213(3.4%)
q323912(13.6%)
q3455 (5.7 %)
q34.111 (1.1 %)
q34.211 (1.1 %)
q34.322 (2.3%)
Incidence of breakpoints on chromosome 9

Discussion

This study reports the karyotype and clinical manifestations of 12 cases with chromosome 9 translocations. Three cases had oligozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia, seven cases were associated with recurrent spontaneous abortions, and two cases each produced a phenotypically normal child (confirmed by amniocentesis). Pregestational and gestational infertility are the most typical two types for infertile male [21]. This study included three cases that exhibited pregestational infertility, and seven cases that exhibited gestational infertility. These patients may consider intracytoplasmic sperm injection or PGD combined within vitro fertilization to reduce subsequent miscarriage rate. The two cases that produced a phenotypically normal child indicated that carriers have a chance of natural conception. The live birth rate in patients with chromosomal translocations choosing to conceive naturally was reported to be 37–63% for the first pregnancy, and then a cumulative rate of 65–83% [22]. To study the role of breakpoints on chromosome 9 in male infertility, the previously published literatures were reviewed. The clinical findings and karyotype regarding chromosome 9 are shown in Table 2. For all carriers from our study and reported literature, the most common chromosome and breakpoint involved chromosome 9 translocation were t(1;9) (12.5%) and 9q32 (13.6%) respectively. Chromosome 1 was most involved with chromosome 9 translocation in this study. For translocation carriers involved in chromosome 1, the clinical phenotype is more likely to be related to chromosome 1. Previous literatures have reported that there are more genes related to spermatogenesis on chromosome 1 [23,24]. The breakpoints on chromosome 1 could interfere with spermatogenesis, leading to azoospermia. In genetic counselling, the breakpoints on chromosome 1 should be considered for the translocation carriers involved in t (1; 9). Breakpoints at 9p12, 9p11, 9p10 and 9q34.1 were found with pregestational infertility, while breakpoints at 9p21, 9q10, 9q11, 9q13, 9q21.1, 9q22, 9q22.2, 9q22.3, 9q34, 9q34.2 and 9q34.3 exhibited gestational infertility. Therefore, more chromosome 9 breakpoints exhibited gestational (compared with pregestational) infertility, in which the carriers’ wife had a tendency to miscarry. Other breakpoints were found with cases of pregestational or gestational infertility. Previous studies have shown that certain genes on chromosome 9 are involved in spermatogenesis. For example, the aquaporin 7 gene (AQP7), located on chromosome 9p13.3, is expressed during the late stages of spermatogenesis [25]. Spermatogenic failure 8 gene (SPGF8), mapped to chromosome 9q33.3, is associated with severe spermatogenic failure [26]. The outer dense fiber of sperm tails 2 gene (ODF2), mapped to chromosome 9q34.11, has a key role in the formation of sperm flagella [27]. Doublesex-and mab3-related transcription factor 1 (DMRT1) and DMRT3, mapped to chromosome 9p24.3, are expressed in germ cell and Sertoli cells [28]. Relaxin 1 (RLN 1) and RLN2, mapped to chromosome 9p24.1, are highly expressed in the prostate and testis [29]. Lysine-specific demethylase 4c (KDM4C) located on chromosome 9p24.1 regulates histone modifications and androgen receptor function [30]. Testis expressed 48 (TEX 48) and TEX53, mapped to chromosome 9q32, are testis-specific genes [31]. The specific function of these genes needs further investigation. Kim et al [32] reported that breakpoints at 9p22; 9p11.2, 9q21.2 and 9q22 were found with cases of impaired spermatogenesis, and breakpoints at 9p23.24, 9p23, 9p12 and 9q22 were associated with recurrent abortion. The key difference between the above paper and our current study is that their subjects had complex chromosomal rearrangements. The carrier is more likely to have normal sperm in semen when they involve balanced translocation of two chromosomes. For the carriers of complex chromosomal rearrangements, the probability of abnormal spermatogenesis increase greatly. Male carriers of chromosome translocations are phenotypically normal, but may produce genetically unbalanced spermatozoa, leading to unbalanced embryos and miscarriage. Translocations may alter the process of spermatogenesis, resulting in azoospermia or oligospermia [33]. To explain the associated clinical pregestational or gestational infertility, three hypotheses have been proposed, including a break within a gene, a positional effect, and cryptic deletion or duplication [34]. During genetic counselling, physicians should consider the breakpoints involved in the translocation. When receiving genetic counselling, the carriers of chromosome 9 translocations should consider suitable reproductive options, including continued attempts at natural conception or in vitro fertilization accompanied by PGD. Limitations of this study include the small number of carriers of chromosome 9 translocations, and the lack of detailed research regarding the specific molecular effects of each translocation by molecular-cytogenetic methods. According to our knowledge, this study is the first review of male carriers involved in chromosome 9 translocation published in previous literature, which will provide reference for clinical genetic counselling.

Conclusion

In the present study, the most common breakpoints involving chromosome 9 translocation were t(1;9) and 9q32 respectively. Most breakpoints at chromosome 9 exhibited gestational infertility. Carriers of chromosome 9 translocations should be counselled to consider in vitro fertilization accompanied by PGD.
  81 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis of chromosome segregation and interchromosomal effect in spermatozoa of a reciprocal translocation t(9,10)(q11;p11.1) carrier.

Authors:  Nathalie Rives; Marion Jarnot; Nathalie Mousset-Siméon; Géraldine Joly; Bertrand Macé
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  Interindividual differences and alterations in the topology of chromosomes in human sperm nuclei of fertile donors and carriers of reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  Ewa Wiland; Marta Zegało; Maciej Kurpisz
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: a systematic review.

Authors:  M T M Franssen; A M Musters; F van der Veen; S Repping; N J Leschot; P M M Bossuyt; M Goddijn; J C Korevaar
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  Accumulation of numerical and structural chromosome imbalances in spermatozoa from reciprocal translocation carriers.

Authors:  A Godo; J Blanco; F Vidal; E Anton
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH analysis for recurrent miscarriage in low-risk reciprocal translocation carriers.

Authors:  Jyotsna Pundir; Laurice Magdalani; Tarek El-Toukhy
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD.

Authors:  G De Krom; Y H J M Arens; E Coonen; C M A Van Ravenswaaij-Arts; M Meijer-Hoogeveen; J L H Evers; R J T Van Golde; C E M De Die-Smulders
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Chromosome studies in 2136 couples with spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  G Bourrouillou; P Colombies; N Dastugue
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Simultaneous cell by cell study of both DNA fragmentation and chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa from chromosomal rearrangement carriers.

Authors:  Alexandre Rouen; Ketty Pyram; Xavier Pollet-Villard; Capucine Hyon; Maud Dorna; Sandrine Marques; Sandra Chantot-Bastaraud; Nicole Joyé; Nino Guy Cassuto; Jean-Pierre Siffroi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Identification and characterization of a novel protein kinase, TESK1, specifically expressed in testicular germ cells.

Authors:  J Toshima; K Ohashi; I Okano; K Nunoue; M Kishioka; K Kuma; T Miyata; M Hirai; T Baba; K Mizuno
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Translocation breakpoints of chromosome 3 in male carriers: a report of twelve cases and a review of the literature

Authors:  Hongguo Zhang; Ruixue Wang; Linlin Li; Haibo Zhu; Hao Zhang; Ruizhi Liu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 0.973

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fertility problems in males carrying an inversion of chromosome 10.

Authors:  Xinyue Zhang; Qingyang Shi; Yanhong Liu; Yuting Jiang; Xiao Yang; Ruizhi Liu; Hongguo Zhang
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-02-18

2.  Association between chromosome 22q11.2 translocation and male oligozoospermia.

Authors:  Peng Zhan; Tingting Hao; Xiao Yang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Analysis of 2 men with t(8;22)(q13;q13) and t(8;14)(q13;q22) chromosomal translocation karyotypes.

Authors:  Qijia Sun; Xiaoyu Zhang; Peng Zhan; Wenjie Tian; Yanli Wang; Xiao Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.