Literature DB >> 30629758

"I didn't take it too seriously because I'd just never heard of it": Experiential knowledge and genetic screening for thalassaemia in the UK.

Felicity K Boardman1, Rachel Hale1.   

Abstract

Members of the public face particular challenges when undergoing reproductive genetic screening. Lack of family history with genetic disease has been identified as a key barrier affecting screening uptake and responses to genetic risk. This study explores this obstacle using beta thalassaemia as a case study. Fifteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted exploring the reproductive views and decisions of people at risk of transmitting thalassaemia. Eleven participants had thalassaemia themselves and/or were members of an affected family. Four participants were identified as thalassaemia carriers through genetic screening programmes with no family history. Notable differences were observed between these two groups. For thalassaemic individuals and families, past experience clarified and facilitated their sense of reproductive responsibility, however carriers struggled to relate to, and incorporate the information into their lives. It was witnessing their child becoming symptomatic-rather than receiving a diagnosis or genetic risk information per se that had the most substantial influence on carriers' subsequent views and decisions. Educational resources used to support genetic screening programmes would benefit from an engagement with the experiential accounts of life with genetic disease in order to more effectively bridge the chasm in knowledge and understanding between affected families and the general public, towards whom expansive genetic screening is aimed.
© 2018 The Authors Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UK; experiential knowledge; genetic screening; reproductive decision-making; social and ethical implications; thalassaemia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30629758      PMCID: PMC7814888          DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  50 in total

Review 1.  Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice.

Authors:  Nicole E Cousens; Clara L Gaff; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Interrogating the dynamics between power, knowledge and pregnant bodies in amniocentesis decision making.

Authors:  Susan Markens; Carole H Browner; H Mabel Preloran
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2009-11-04

Review 3.  A Review on Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitudes.

Authors:  Rebecca R Moultrie; Julia Kish-Doto; Holly Peay; Megan A Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Parental attitudes toward ethical and social issues surrounding the expansion of newborn screening using new technologies.

Authors:  L E Hasegawa; K A Fergus; N Ojeda; S M Au
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  'Balance' is in the eye of the beholder: providing information to support informed choices in antenatal screening via Antenatal Screening Web Resource.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Louise Bryant; Jenny Hewison
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Public attitudes regarding a pilot study of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Kathryn J Swoboda; Louisa Stark; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Attitudes of cystic fibrosis patients and parents toward carrier screening and related reproductive issues.

Authors:  Sandra Janssens; Davit Chokoshvilli; Carmen Binst; Inge Mahieu; Lidewij Henneman; Anne De Paepe; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.

Authors:  Katherine F Wright; Louise D Bryant; Stephen Morley; Jenny Hewison; Alistair J A Duff; Daniel Peckham
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  "What is this genetics, anyway?" Understandings of genetics, illness causality and inheritance among British Pakistani users of genetic services.

Authors:  Alison Shaw; Jane A Hurst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of women's experiences and expectations of participation.

Authors:  Vicki Tsianakas; Karl Atkin; Michael W Calnan; Elizabeth Dormandy; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  3 in total

1.  Newborn screening for haemophilia: The views of families and adults living with haemophilia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale; Philip J Young
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.287

2.  "I didn't take it too seriously because I'd just never heard of it": Experiential knowledge and genetic screening for thalassaemia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability: A mixed-methods study of the views of adults, carriers, and family members living with thalassemia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Corinna Clark; Elsita Jungkurth; Philip J Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.