Literature DB >> 28497418

Assessing time-of-flight signal-to-noise ratio gains within the myocardium and subsequent reductions in administered activity in cardiac PET studies.

Ian S Armstrong1, Christine M Tonge2, Parthiban Arumugam2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Time-of-flight (TOF) is known to increase signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and facilitate reductions in administered activity. Established measures of SNR gain are derived from areas of uniform uptake, which is not applicable to the heterogeneous uptake in cardiac PET images using fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG). This study aimed to develop a technique to quantify SNR gains within the myocardium due to TOF.
METHODS: Reference TOF SNR gains were measured in 88 FDG oncology patients. Phantom data were used to translate reference SNR gains and validate a method of quantifying SNR gains within the myocardium from parametric images produced from multiple replicate images. This technique was applied to 13 FDG cardiac viability patients.
RESULTS: Reference TOF SNR gains of +23% ± 8.5% were measured in oncology patients. Measurements of SNR gain from the phantom data were in agreement and showed the parametric image technique to be sufficiently robust. SNR gains within the myocardium in the viability patients were +21% ± 2.8%.
CONCLUSION: A method to quantify SNR gains from TOF within the myocardium has been developed and evaluated. SNR gains within the myocardium are comparable to those observed by established methods. This allows guidance for protocol optimization for TOF systems in cardiac PET.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myocardial perfusion imaging: PET; PET/CT imaging; basic science; image quality; image reconstruction

Year:  2017        PMID: 28497418     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0916-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  19 in total

1.  Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.

Authors:  C R Schmidtlein; B J Beattie; D L Bailey; T J Akhurst; W Wang; M Gönen; A S Kirov; J L Humm
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  B W Jakoby; Y Bercier; M Conti; M E Casey; B Bendriem; D W Townsend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  First experimental results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti; Bernard Bendriem; Mike Casey; Mu Chen; Frank Kehren; Christian Michel; Vladimir Panin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information?

Authors:  Jorge D Oldan; Shetal N Shah; Richard C Brunken; Frank P DiFilippo; Nancy A Obuchowski; Michael A Bolen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Approaches to reducing radiation dose from radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Ron Blankstein; Hicham Skali; Mi-Ae Park; Jolene Fantony; Charles Mauceri; James Semer; Stephen C Moore; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; M Bugrahan Oktay; Michael E Casey; James J Hamill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.679

Review 7.  The next generation of cardiac positron emission tomography imaging agents: discovery of flurpiridaz F-18 for detection of coronary disease.

Authors:  Ming Yu; Stephan G Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Simon P Robinson
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Impact of Time-of-Flight Reconstruction on Cardiac PET Images of Obese Patients.

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; Richard C Brunken
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.794

9.  Evaluation of noise equivalent count parameters as indicators of adult whole-body FDG-PET image quality.

Authors:  Garry M McDermott; Fahmid U Chowdhury; Andrew F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.668

10.  Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Jamshid Maddahi; B K Tamarappoo; Johannes Czernin; Raymond Taillefer; James E Udelson; C Michael Gibson; Marybeth Devine; Joel Lazewatsky; Gajanan Bhat; Dana Washburn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  4 in total

1.  Does time-of-flight improve image quality in the heart?

Authors:  R Glenn Wells; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Understanding the impact of advanced PET reconstruction in cardiac PET: The devil is in the details.

Authors:  Ian S Armstrong
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients.

Authors:  Paul K R Dasari; Judson P Jones; Michael E Casey; Yuanyuan Liang; Vasken Dilsizian; Mark F Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  EANM procedural guidelines for PET/CT quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Mark Lubberink; Fabien Hyafil; Antti Saraste; Riemer H J A Slart; Denis Agostini; Carmela Nappi; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Hein J Verberne
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 9.236

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.