| Literature DB >> 29899400 |
Michael Haimerl1, Ute Probst2, Stefanie Poelsterl2, Lukas Beyer2, Claudia Fellner2, Michael Selgrad3, Matthias Hornung4, Christian Stroszczynski2, Philipp Wiggermann2.
Abstract
Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is a paramagnetic MRI contrast agent with raising popularity and has been used for evaluation of imaging-based liver function in recent years. In order to verify whether liver function as determined by real-time breath analysis using the intravenous administration of 13C-methacetin can be estimated quantitatively from Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI using signal intensity (SI) values. 110 patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3-T MRI and, for the evaluation of liver function, a 13C-methacetin breath test (13C-MBT). SI values from before (SIpre) and 20 min after (SIpost) contrast media injection were acquired by T1-weighted volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequences with fat suppression. The relative enhancement (RE) between the plain and contrast-enhanced SI values was calculated and evaluated in a correlation analysis of 13C-MBT values to SIpost and RE to obtain a SI-based estimation of 13C-MBT values. The simple regression model showed a log-linear correlation of 13C-MBT values with SIpost and RE (p < 0.001). Stratified by 3 different categories of 13C-MBT readouts, there was a constant significant decrease in both SIpost (p ≤ 0.002) and RE (p ≤ 0.033) with increasing liver disease progression as assessed by the 13C-MBT. Liver function as determined using real-time 13C-methacetin breath analysis can be estimated quantitatively from Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI using SI-based indices.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29899400 PMCID: PMC5998051 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27401-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics for all patients and each 13C-MBT readout category.
| parameters | n = 110 | 13C-MBT categories | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| male | 83 (75.5%) | 14 (42.4%) | 43 (93.5%) | 26 (83.9%) |
| female | 27 (24.5%) | 19 (57.6%) | 3 (6.5%) | 5 (16.1%) |
| age [years] | 60.84 ± 9.52 | 59.88 ± 11.02 | 62.33 ± 9.40 | 59.65 ± 7.81 |
| height [cm] | 172.92 ± 7.62 | 168.97 ± 8.62 | 175.37 ± 7.27 | 173.48 ± 5.05 |
| weight [kg] | 85.84 ± 16.03 | 77.74 ± 19.80 | 89.96 ± 12.83 | 88.35 ± 12.80 |
| SIpre | 192.98 ± 38.40 | 204.80 ± 41.08 | 185.30 ± 35.71 | 191.80 ± 37.42 |
| SIpost | 347.36 ± 100.38 | 414.03 ± 87.85 | 345.59 ± 97.14 | 279.03 ± 67.09 |
| RE | 0.80 ± 0.37 | 1.04 ± 0.27 | 0.86 ± 0.35 | 0.46 ± 0.20 |
| 13C-MBT [µg/kg/h] | 234.66 ± 124.08 | 391.21 ± 53.28 | 217.78 ± 49.39 | 93.03 ± 33.59 |
Values indicate the mean ± standard deviation. RE: relative enhancement as a function of SI-based indices. SI: mean signal intensity of the liver. 13C-MBT: 13C-labeled methacetin metabolism liver function breath test.
Figure 1Liver function analysis in patients with normal liver function (A,B,C) and severely impaired liver function (D,E,F). The patients underwent plain (A,D) and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced HBP (B,E) T1-weighted VIBE sequences with fat suppression, as well as a 13C-MBT, over a maximum time span of 60 min (C,F). In the case of the displayed patients, a 13C-MBT readout value of 409 µg/kg/h (C) was considered normal liver function (SIpre, 182.67; SIpost, 441.67; RE, 1.42), while a 13C-MBT readout value of 57 µg/kg/h (F) was considered impaired liver function (SIpre, 258.50; SIpost, 332.83; RE, 0.29). The lesion observed in the liver with impaired function (D,E) was caused by former radiofrequency ablations treatments. The delta-over-baseline (DOB) was assessed inline automatically and describes the increase in the RPDB-corrected 13CO2:12CO2 ratio to the basal value (blue line). The evaluated 13C-MBT value was calculated as the product of the DOBmax, RPDB, CO2 production and molar mass of 13C-methacetin per body weight[13]. The DOBmax (green line) was defined after an increase in DOB was no longer observable. At the time point 0, the 13C-methacetin was applied via bolus injection.
Figure 2Correlation analysis of SI-based liver function indices to logarithmic values of 13C-MBT readout in scatterplots. The SI values obtained without contrast enhancement (SI_pre) show no predictive power for the logarithmic values of 13C-MBT (r = 0.213, p = 0.120; A), while the contrast-enhanced SI values (SI_post) show a significant correlation (r = 0.554, p < 0.001; B). A strong linear prediction of logarithmic 13C-MBT values can be observed for the relative enhancement (RE) values (r = 0.665, p < 0.001; C).
Simple linear regression models of SI-based indices with logarithmic values of 13C-MBT.
| B (95% CI) | p-value | r | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log(13C-MBT) | RE | 0.507 (0.398–0.615) | <0.001 | 0.665 |
| SIpre | 0.001 (−0.001–0.002) | 0.213 | 0.120 | |
| SIpost | 0.002 (0.001–0.002) | <0.001 | 0.554 |
RE: relative enhancement as a function of SI-based indices. SI: mean signal intensity of the liver. 13C-MBT: 13C-labeled methacetin metabolism liver function breath test. r: correlation coefficient. B: linear regression coefficient. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 3Boxplot analysis of SI-based indices separated by 13C-MBT readout categories. Native SI values (SI_pre; A) show no significant difference between the different 13C-MBT readout categories, except for Categories 1 and 2. SI values obtained after contrast enhancement (SI_post; B) and corrected by native SI values (RE; C) show significant differences among the 13C-MBT readout categories. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Underlying diseases for MRI examination and 13C-MBT for each medical case.
| patients (n = 110) | ||
|---|---|---|
| HCC | with cirrhosis | 62 |
| without cirrhosis | 1 | |
| liver disease | liver cirrhosis | 5 |
| autoimmune disease | overlap syndrome (AIH and PBC) | 1 |
| benign liver lesion | focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) | 1 |
| hemangioma | 4 | |
| hepatic vein thrombosis | Budd-Chiari syndrome | 1 |
| secondary liver malignancies | carcinoma of the ileum or duodenum | 2 |
| cholangiocarcinoma | 10 | |
| colon carcinoma | 1 | |
| mamma carcinoma | 2 | |
| rectal cancer | 12 | |
| sigma carcinoma | 6 | |
| thymoma | 1 | |
| uveal melanoma | 1 |
Figure 4Representative example of ROI placement in unenhanced (A) and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced VIBE (B) scans of a patient with normal liver function. White circles mark ROIs manually placed at identical places in the right and left lobe of the liver.