BACKGROUND: Liver failure has remained a major cause of mortality after hepatectomy, but it is difficult to predict preoperatively. This study describes the introduction into clinical practice of the new LiMAx test and provides an algorithm for its use in the clinical management of hepatic tumours. METHODS: Patients with hepatic tumours and indications for hepatectomy were investigated perioperatively with the LiMAx test. In one patient, analysis of liver volume was carried out with preoperative three-dimensional virtual resection. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients with hepatic tumours were evaluated for hepatectomy. Blinded preoperative LiMAx values were significantly higher before resection (n= 139; mean 351 microg/kg/h, range 285-451 microg/kg/h) than before refusal (n= 29; mean 299 microg/kg/h, range 223-376 microg/kg/h; P= 0.009). In-hospital mortality rates were 38.1% (8/21 patients), 10.5% (2/19 patients) and 1.0% (1/99 patients) for postoperative LiMAx of <80 microg/kg/h, 80-100 microg/kg/h and >100 microg/kg/h, respectively (P < 0.0001). A decision tree was developed to avoid critical values and its prospective preoperative application revealed a reduction in mortality from 9.4% to 3.4% (P= 0.019). DISCUSSION: The LiMAx test can validly determine liver function capacity and is feasible in every clinical situation. Combination with virtual resection could enable the calculation of residual liver function. The LiMAx decision tree algorithm for hepatectomy might significantly improve preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcome in liver surgery.
BACKGROUND:Liver failure has remained a major cause of mortality after hepatectomy, but it is difficult to predict preoperatively. This study describes the introduction into clinical practice of the new LiMAx test and provides an algorithm for its use in the clinical management of hepatic tumours. METHODS:Patients with hepatic tumours and indications for hepatectomy were investigated perioperatively with the LiMAx test. In one patient, analysis of liver volume was carried out with preoperative three-dimensional virtual resection. RESULTS: A total of 329 patients with hepatic tumours were evaluated for hepatectomy. Blinded preoperative LiMAx values were significantly higher before resection (n= 139; mean 351 microg/kg/h, range 285-451 microg/kg/h) than before refusal (n= 29; mean 299 microg/kg/h, range 223-376 microg/kg/h; P= 0.009). In-hospital mortality rates were 38.1% (8/21 patients), 10.5% (2/19 patients) and 1.0% (1/99 patients) for postoperative LiMAx of <80 microg/kg/h, 80-100 microg/kg/h and >100 microg/kg/h, respectively (P < 0.0001). A decision tree was developed to avoid critical values and its prospective preoperative application revealed a reduction in mortality from 9.4% to 3.4% (P= 0.019). DISCUSSION: The LiMAx test can validly determine liver function capacity and is feasible in every clinical situation. Combination with virtual resection could enable the calculation of residual liver function. The LiMAx decision tree algorithm for hepatectomy might significantly improve preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcome in liver surgery.
Authors: Deha Erdogan; Bob H M Heijnen; Roelof J Bennink; Mariël Kok; Sander Dinant; Irene H Straatsburg; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik Journal: Liver Int Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Rebecca A Schroeder; Carlos E Marroquin; Barbara Phillips Bute; Shukri Khuri; William G Henderson; Paul C Kuo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Maartje A J van den Broek; Steven W M Olde Damink; Cornelis H C Dejong; Hauke Lang; Massimo Malagó; Rajiv Jalan; Fuat H Saner Journal: Liver Int Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Bolanle Asiyanbola; David Chang; Ana Luiza Gleisner; Hari Nathan; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Johan Friso Lock; Maciej Malinowski; Daniel Seehofer; Steffi Hoppe; Rhea Isabel Röhl; Stefan Markus Niehues; Peter Neuhaus; Martin Stockmann Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2012-06-24 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Maciej Malinowski; Johan Friso Lock; Daniel Seehofer; Bernhard Gebauer; Antje Schulz; Lina Demirel; Jan Bednarsch; Victoria Stary; Peter Neuhaus; Martin Stockmann Journal: Surg Today Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 2.549
Authors: T M Lodewick; P H Alizai; R M van Dam; A A J Roeth; M Schmeding; C Heidenhain; A Andert; N Gassler; C H C Dejong; U P Neumann Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Maximilian Jara; Tomasz Dziodzio; Maciej Malinowski; Katja Lüttgert; Radoslav Nikolov; Paul Viktor Ritschl; Robert Öllinger; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Jan Bednarsch; Elisabeth Blüthner; Maciej Malinowski; Daniel Seehofer; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Stuart M Robinson; Rehan Saif; Gourab Sen; Jeremy J French; Bryon C Jaques; Richard M Charnley; Derek M Manas; Steven A White Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 3.647