Literature DB >> 25263095

Prognostic value of enzymatic liver function for the estimation of short-term survival of liver transplant candidates: a prospective study with the LiMAx test.

Maximilian Jara1, Maciej Malinowski, Katja Lüttgert, Eckart Schott, Peter Neuhaus, Martin Stockmann.   

Abstract

LiMAx has been recently proposed as a new quantitative liver function test. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of LiMAx to assess short-term survival in liver transplant candidates and compare its performance to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR). Liver function of 167 chronic liver failure patients without hepatocellular carcinoma was prospectively investigated when they were evaluated for liver transplantation. Primary study endpoints were liver-related death within 6 months of follow-up. Within 6 months of follow-up, 18 patients died and 36 underwent liver transplantation. Median LiMAx results on evaluation day were significantly lower in patients who died (99 μg/kg/h vs. 55 μg/kg/h; P = 0.024), while median ICG-PDR results did not differ within both groups (4.4%/min vs. 3.5%/min; P = 0.159). LiMAx showed a higher negative predictive value (NPV: 0.93) as compared with ICG-PDR (NPV: 0.90) and the MELD (NPV: 0.91) in predicting risk of death within 6 months. In conclusion, LiMAx provides good prognostic information of liver transplant candidates. In particular, patients who are not at risk of death can be identified reliably by measuring actual enzymatic liver function capacity.
© 2014 Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic liver disease; liver function; liver function test; methacetin; prognosis; survival; transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263095     DOI: 10.1111/tri.12441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  13 in total

1.  A novel variant of the 13C-methacetin liver function breath test that eliminates the confounding effect of individual differences in systemic CO2 kinetics.

Authors:  Hermann-Georg Holzhütter; Tilo Wuensch; Robert Gajowski; Nikolaus Berndt; Sascha Bulik; David Meierhofer; Martin Stockmann
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Indocyanine green kinetics to assess liver function: Ready for a clinical dynamic assessment in major liver surgery?

Authors:  Andrea De Gasperi; Ernestina Mazza; Manlio Prosperi
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-08

3.  Impact of Integrating Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Levels into Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score for Survival Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Reham Abdel-Wahab; Manal M Hassan; Bhawana George; Roberto Carmagnani Pestana; Lianchun Xiao; Sahin Lacin; Suayib Yalcin; Ahmed S Shalaby; Humaid O Al-Shamsi; Kanwal Raghav; Robert A Wolff; James C Yao; Lauren Girard; Abedul Haque; Dan G Duda; Simona Dima; Irinel Popescu; Hesham A Elghazaly; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Thomas A Aloia; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Yun Shin Chun; Asif Rashid; Jeffrey S Morris; Hesham M Amin; Ahmed O Kaseb
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.935

4.  Effects of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy on liver function--an analysis of impact and functional recovery using the LiMAx test.

Authors:  Maximilian Jara; Jan Bednarsch; Maciej Malinowski; Johann Pratschke; Martin Stockmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Application of the Liver Maximum Function Capacity Test in Acute Liver Failure: A Helpful Tool for Decision-Making in Liver Transplantation?

Authors:  Florian Wolfgang Rudolf Vondran; Carsten Schumacher; Kai Johanning; Björn Hartleben; Wolfgang Knitsch; Olaf Wiesner; Elmar Jaeckel; Michael Peter Manns; Juergen Klempnauer; Hueseyin Bektas; Frank Lehner
Journal:  Case Rep Transplant       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  Randomized clinical trial comparing liver resection with and without perioperative assessment of liver function.

Authors:  M Stockmann; F W R Vondran; R Fahrner; H M Tautenhahn; J Mittler; H Bektas; M Malinowski; M Jara; I Klein; J F Lock
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-06-14

7.  Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx - a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Matthias Buechter; Sarah Kersting; Guido Gerken; Alisan Kahraman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prognostic impact of ICG-PDR in patients with hypoxic hepatitis.

Authors:  Thomas Horvatits; Nikolaus Kneidinger; Andreas Drolz; Kevin Roedl; Karoline Rutter; Stefan Kluge; Michael Trauner; Valentin Fuhrmann
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Hepatobiliary MRI: Signal intensity based assessment of liver function correlated to 13C-Methacetin breath test.

Authors:  Michael Haimerl; Ute Probst; Stefanie Poelsterl; Lukas Beyer; Claudia Fellner; Michael Selgrad; Matthias Hornung; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Validation of a new prognostic model to predict short and medium-term survival in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Tomasz Dziodzio; Robert Öllinger; Wenzel Schöning; Antonia Rothkäppel; Radoslav Nikolov; Andrzej Juraszek; Paul V Ritschl; Martin Stockmann; Johann Pratschke; Maximilian Jara
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.