| Literature DB >> 29892086 |
Zhaojun Li1, Yun Bai1, Wanbin Li1, Feng Gao1, Yi Kuang1, Lianfang Du2, Xianghong Luo3.
Abstract
Inflammatory activity plays a central role in the development of carotid rupture-vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques, which is one of the major contributors to acute ischemic stroke. Our objective was to characterize carotid intraplaque neovascularizations (INP) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and evaluate plaque burden through exploring the relationship between INP and cell count of peripheral leukocytes. Sixty-two patients with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) were enrolled in this study. CEUS was performed to characterize the carotid artery plaques. The correlations between the CEUS imaging features of carotid plaques and leukocyte counts were investigated. The results showed that the characteristic parameters derived from CEUS, including peak of time-intensity curve (TIC-P), mean of time-intensity curve (TIC-M), peak (FC-P), sharpness (FC-S) and area under the curve (FC-AUC) compared with the control group, were all increased in the stroke group. TIC-P, TIC-M and FC-P were negatively related to lymphocytes, respectively. FC-S and FC-AUC were positively correlated with neutrophils, respectively. Our study indicated carotid INP was closely related to the peripheral leukocytes count. CEUS may serve as a useful tool to predict vulnerability of plaque.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29892086 PMCID: PMC5995867 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27260-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline and Clinical Data of Patients with and without AIS.
| Variable | Total (n = 116) | AIS (n = 62) | No AIS (n = 54) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (F/M) | 26/90 | 14/48 | 12/42 | 1.000 |
| Age, mean (SD), y | 66.3 (7.8) | 67.7 (8.8) | 64.7 (6.8) | 0.121 |
| Height, mean (SD), cm | 166.7 (6.5) | 166.9 (6.4) | 166.6 (6.6) | 0.840 |
| Weight, mean (SD), kg | 64.3 (10.9) | 64.0 (11.1) | 64.7 (10.6) | 0.805 |
| Body mass index, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 23.0 (3.0) | 22.8 (3.1) | 23.2 (2.8) | 0.497 |
| Baseline SBP, mean (SD), mm Hg | 136.5 (16.3) | 137.5 (15.2) | 135.3 (17.6) | 0.622 |
| Baseline DBP, mean (SD), mm Hg | 85.8 (10.0) | 85.8 (9.3) | 85.7 (10.9) | 0.968 |
| History of diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 42.0 (36.2) | 24.0 (38.7) | 18.0 (33.3) | 0.786 |
| History of hypertension, n (%) | 50.0 (43.1) | 28.0 (45.2) | 22.0 (40.7) | 0.795 |
| Fasting plasma glucose, mean (SD), m mol / L | 5.9 (1.5) | 6.1 (1.6) | 5.7 (1.4) | 0.407 |
| Total cholesterol, mean (SD), m mol / L | 4.6 (1.1) | 4.6 (1.2) | 4.5 (0.9) | 0.736 |
| LDL cholesterol, mean (SD), m mol / L | 2.9 (1.0) | 2.9 (1.1) | 3.0 (0.8) | 0.693 |
| Triglycerides, mean (SD), m mol / L | 1.5 (1.1) | 1.7 (1.3) | 1.3 (0.8) | 0.295 |
| Leukocytes, mean (SD), ×109/L | 6.57 (2.09) | 7.05 (2.33) | 6.01 (1.82) | 0.028 |
| Lymphocytes, mean (SD), ×109/L | 1.82 (0.71) | 1.67 (0.54) | 1.99 (0.91) | 0.047 |
| Neutrophils, mean (SD), ×109/L | 4.18 (1.66) | 4.59 (1.72) | 3.71 (1.59) | 0.018 |
| Monocytes, mean (SD), ×109/L | 0.43 (0.20) | 0.46 (0.22) | 0.41 (0.18) | 0.886 |
| Eosinophils, mean (SD), ×109/L | 0.27 (0.61) | 0.27 (0.58) | 0.27 (0.65) | 0.954 |
| Basophils, mean (SD), ×109/L | 0.07 (0.25) | 0.07 (0.27) | 0.07 (0.22) | 0.988 |
F indicates female; M, male; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; 1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa.
Imaging Data in Patients with and without AIS.
| Variable | AIS (n = 62) | No AIS (n = 54) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | SBP | DBP | ||||
| TIC-P, mean (SD), dB | 55.08 (14.57) | 42.92 (14.63) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| TIC-M, mean (SD), dB | 25.29 (8.89) | 21.88 (8.15) | 0.046 | 0.050 | 0.042 | 0.044 |
| FC-P, mean (SD) | 25.24 (8.92) | 23.89 (8.09) | 0.041 | 0.051 | 0.053 | 0.047 |
| FC-S, mean (SD), 1/s | 0.71 (0.27) | 0.20 (0.11) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| FC-AUC, mean (SD), 1/s | 17.22 (8.38) | 4.40 (1.97) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Grade 1 | 8 (13) | 25 (46) | <0.001 | / | / | / |
| Grade 2 | 54 (87) | 29 (54) | <0.001 | / | / | / |
TIC-P: the peak of time-intensity curve; TIC-M: the mean of time-intensity curve; FC: fitting curves of time-intensity; P: peak; AUC: area under the curve; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
Figure 3Intra- and inter-observer variability of FC-P (A,B) and TIC-P (C,D) measurements performed in 20 subjects: Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between measurement for FC-P and TIC-P, both by the same observer (A,C) and by two independent observers (B,D).
Figure 4Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) in carotid arteries of a patient with both acute ischemic stroke (A–C) and a patient without acute ischemic stroke (D–F). IPNs were observed in the plaque ROI (yellow arrows).
Figure 1Correlations of FC-P, FC-S and FC-AUC with lymphocytes in AIS patients (A–C) and non-AIS controls (D–F). FC-P, peak of the fitting curve; FC-S, sharpness of the fitting curve; FC-AUC, area under the fitting curve; AIS, acute ischemic stroke. Correlation coefficients and P-value are given in the graphs.
Figure 2Correlations of TIC-P and TIC-M with lymphocytes in AIS patients (A–B) and non-AIS controls (C–D). TIC-P, peak of the time-intensity curve; TIC-M, mean of the time-intensity curve; FC-AUC, area under the fitting curve; AIS, acute ischemic stroke. Correlation coefficients and P-value are given in the graphs.
Figure 5The automated quantification of intraplaqueneovasculization (IPN) of carotid plaque using QontraXt. (A) A manual region of interest (ROI) was placed to enclose the whole area of the plaque with IPN demonstrated in the plaque ROI (arrow). (B) Parametric imaging: Parametric imaging results into four images that corresponds to the maps of the curve fitting parameters. (C) The time-intensity curve (green-colored curve). (D) Parametric fitting curve: time-intensity fitting curve (blue curve). Numeric values of peak, TP, sharpness, and AUC were automatically calculated based on the time-intensity curve and are shown at the top of the graphs.