Literature DB >> 20413774

Inflammation within carotid atherosclerotic plaque: assessment with late-phase contrast-enhanced US.

David R Owen1, Joseph Shalhoub, Sam Miller, Thomas Gauthier, Ortansia Doryforou, Alun H Davies, Edward L S Leen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if the number of nontargeted microbubbles retained in human carotid plaque is sufficient to be detected with ultrasonography (US).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the local research ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained. A total of 37 subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (mean age, 69.9 years; age range, 49-86 years), of whom 27 (73%) were men (mean age, 69.7 years; age range, 58-86 years) and 10 (27%) were women (mean age, 70.3 years; age range, 49-86 years), were studied between December 2008 and May 2009 with late-phase (LP) contrast material-enhanced US by using flash imaging with a nonlinear mode at an intermediate mechanical index of 0.34 6 minutes after bolus contrast agent injection. Plaques were defined as symptomatic if symptoms consistent with stroke, transient ischemic attack, or amaurosis fugax had occurred in the neurovascular territory of the plaque studied within 12 months prior to entry into the study. Plaques were defined as asymptomatic if no such events had ever occurred within the neurovascular territory. Raw linear data were used to quantify echogenicity of the plaque, which was normalized to lumen echogenicity. Gray-scale median score was also calculated.
RESULTS: Of the 37 subjects, 16 (43%) had symptomatic plaques and 21 (57%) had asymptomatic plaques. All examinations yielded evaluable LP contrast-enhanced US data. Normalized LP plaque echogenicity was greater in the symptomatic group (0.39; 95% confidence interval: -0.11, 0.89) than in the asymptomatic group (0.69; 95% confidence interval: -1.04, -0.34) (P = .0005). There was a moderate (rho = -0.44, P = .016) inverse correlation between normalized LP plaque echogenicity and gray-scale median score.
CONCLUSION: By quantifying microbubble retention within the carotid plaque, LP contrast-enhanced US depicts clear differences between groups of subjects with plaque ipsilateral to symptoms and asymptomatic plaques. This technique has promise as a tissue-specific marker of inflammation and a potential role in the risk stratification of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20413774     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D R J Owen; A C Lindsay; R P Choudhury; Z A Fayad
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 13.739

2.  Progress in atherosclerotic plaque imaging.

Authors:  Giulia Soloperto; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28

3.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability.

Authors:  M-X Tang; H Mulvana; T Gauthier; A K P Lim; D O Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; E Stride
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the carotid system: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Vasileios Rafailidis; Afroditi Charitanti; Thomas Tegos; Evangelos Destanis; Ioannis Chryssogonidis
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2017-02-09

5.  An Ultrasonographic Multiparametric Carotid Plaque Risk Index Associated with Cerebrovascular Symptomatology: A Study Comparing Color Doppler Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography.

Authors:  V Rafailidis; I Chryssogonidis; C Xerras; E Grisan; G-A Cheimariotis; T Tegos; D Rafailidis; P S Sidhu; A Charitanti-Kouridou
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  3D-Arterial analysis software and CEUS in the assessment of severity and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a comparison with CTA and histopathology.

Authors:  Daniele Fresilli; Nicola Di Leo; Ombretta Martinelli; Luca Di Marzo; Patrizia Pacini; Vincenzo Dolcetti; Giovanni Del Gaudio; Fabrizio Canni; Ludovica Isabella Ricci; Corrado De Vito; Corrado Caiazzo; Raffaella Carletti; Cira Di Gioia; Iacopo Carbone; Steven B Feinstein; Carlo Catalano; Vito Cantisani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 7.  Carotid plaque imaging and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Guangming Zhu; Jason Hom; Ying Li; Bin Jiang; Fatima Rodriguez; Dominik Fleischmann; David Saloner; Michele Porcu; Yanrong Zhang; Luca Saba; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-08

Review 8.  Microwave radiometry: a new non-invasive method for the detection of vulnerable plaque.

Authors:  Konstantinos Toutouzas; Andreas Synetos; Charalampia Nikolaou; Konstantinos Stathogiannis; Eleftherios Tsiamis; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-12

Review 9.  Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease: Limits and Perspectives.

Authors:  Gianfranco Varetto; Lorenzo Gibello; Claudio Castagno; Simone Quaglino; Matteo Ripepi; Emilio Benintende; Andrea Gattuso; Paolo Garneri; Stefano Zan; Giacomo Capaldi; Ugo Bertoldo; Pietro Rispoli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Multimodality imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: Going beyond stenosis.

Authors:  Divyata Hingwala; Chandrasekharan Kesavadas; Padmavathy N Sylaja; Bejoy Thomas; Tirur Raman Kapilamoorthy
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.