| Literature DB >> 27452862 |
Yang Li1, Ying Zhu1, Youbin Deng1, Yani Liu1, Yuhang Mao1, Junli Wang1, Jie Sun1.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to assess the therapeutic effect of the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab on plaques of various stages in rabbit models using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). Abdominal aortic atherosclerosis was induced in 55 rabbits. Thirty-six randomly selected rabbits were divided into 2 groups according to the timing of the bevacizumab injection: an early-stage plaque group (Group ESP) and a later-stage plaque group (Group LSP). The remainder were considered the control group. Standard ultrasonography and CEUS imaging of the abdominal aorta were performed. The animals were euthanized after CEUS, and plaque specimens were harvested for histological staining of CD31. The control group exhibited a substantially higher enhanced intensity, a higher ratio of enhanced intensity in the plaque to that in the lumen, and an increased number of CD31-positive microvessels in the plaque sections than Groups ESP and LSP (P < 0.05 for all). A higher enhanced intensity (P = 0.044), a higher ratio of enhanced intensity in the plaque to that in the lumen (P = 0.023) and more CD31-positive microvessels in the plaque sections (P = 0.006) were found in Group LSP than in Group ESP. Bevacizumab demonstrated more advanced inhibition of neovascularization in early-stage plaques in rabbits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27452862 PMCID: PMC4958919 DOI: 10.1038/srep30417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Blood pressure, heart rate and serum lipids before and after bevacizumab administration.
| Group ESP (n = 18) | Group LSP (n = 18) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| before BV | after BV | before BV | after BV | |
| SBP, mm Hg | 84 ± 13 | 80 ± 13 | 82 ± 10 | 79 ± 11 |
| DBP, mm Hg | 56 ± 16 | 53 ± 17 | 55 ± 15 | 52 ± 16 |
| HR, beats/min | 260 ± 30 | 253 ± 18 | 255 ± 24 | 253 ± 19 |
| TC, mmol/L | 35.7 ± 1.9 | 36.9 ± 1.2 | 35.8 ± 1.7 | 36.3 ± 1.4 |
| TG, mmol/L | 4.1 ± 2.9 | 6.0 ± 3.6 | 4.0 ± 2.5 | 5.5 ± 2.7 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 36.6 ± 6.5 | 42.2 ± 1.6 | 36.3 ± 6.4 | 38.7 ± 6.3 |
Note: Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. BV = bevacizumab; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HR = heart rate; TC = serum cholesterol; TG = triglycerides; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
There were no differences in blood pressure, heart rate, TC, TG or LDL-C before and after bevacizumab administration in both Groups LSP and ESP (p > 0.05 for all).
Plaque features depicted during standard and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
| Group ESP | Group LSP | Controls | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 18 | n = 18 | n = 19 | ||
| IMT, mm | 0.24 ± 0.05* | 0.27 ± 0.05† | 0.45 ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
| Thickness, mm | 0.84 ± 0.16 | 0.84 ± 0.08 | 0.80 ± 0.14 | 0.931 |
| EI, dB | 3.65 ± 1.43*‡ | 5.47 ± 1.48† | 11.52 ± 2.62 | <0.001 |
| Ratio | 0.33 ± 0.13*‡ | 0.48 ± 0.10† | 0.67 ± 0.13 | <0.001 |
Note: Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. IMT = intimal-medial thickness; EI = enhanced intensity in the plaque; Ratio = the ratio of the enhanced intensity in the plaque to that in the lumen of the abdominal aorta.
*†p < 0.05 vs. controls.
‡p < 0.05 vs. Group LSP.
No significant difference in the maximum thickness of the plaques was observed among the three groups (p > 0.05). The control group exhibited a higher IMT, EI and Ratio compared with Groups ESP and LSP (p < 0.05). EI and Ratio in Group LSP were significantly increased compared with Group ESP (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Representative micrograph of atherosclerotic plaque in the Control group (a), Group LSP (b) and ESP (c) (haematoxylin-eosin staining). No significant difference in plaque area, IMT or the maximum thickness of the plaques was observed between Groups ESP and LSP. The control group exhibited a higher IMT, maximum thickness of the plaques and a larger plaque area compared with Groups ESP and LSP.
Plaque morphological measurements by histological analysis.
| Group ESP | Group LSP | Controls | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 18 | n = 18 | n = 19 | ||
| Plaque area, % | 10.37 ± 2.99* | 12.32 ± 2.53† | 35.33 ± 2.05 | <0.001 |
| IMT, mm | 0.22 ± 0.04* | 0.20 ± 0.02† | 0.42 ± 0.03 | <0.001 |
| Thickness, mm | 0.79 ± 0.02* | 0.80 ± 0.03† | 0.85 ± 0.03 | 0.018 |
Note: Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. IMT = intimal-medial thickness.
*†p < 0.05 vs. controls.
No significant difference in plaque area, IMT and the maximum thickness of the plaques was observed between Groups ESP and LSP (p > 0.05). The control group exhibited a higher IMT, maximum thickness of the plaques and a larger plaque area compared with Groups ESP and LSP (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Representative immunohistochemical images of plaque in the Control group (a), Group LSP (b) and ESP (c) (CD-31 staining). Arrows in panel (a–c) indicated the intraplaque neovascularization. The total number of microvessels of plaques in the control group was greater than that in Groups ESP and LSP. Microvessels of the plaques in Group LSP were more than those in Group ESP.
Figure 3The quantification of CD31-positive microvessels in the plaque sections.
The number of microvessels of plaques in the control group was greater than that in Groups ESP and LSP (p < 0.001). Microvessels of the plaques in Group LSP were more than those in Group ESP (p < 0.01).
Figure 4Contrast-enhanced ultrasound images of the abdominal aorta.
(a) Longitudinal view obtained 2s after injection of contrast agent. No enhancement was observed in the plaque (arrows). (b) Longitudinal view obtained 46s after injection of contrast agent. Plaque (arrows) was enhanced after the injection of contrast agent. (c) The signal intensity-versus-time curve in the lumen of the abdominal aorta (blue area and curve) and plaque (yellow area and curve). A in panel c = enhanced intensity after injection of contrast agent; B in panel c = baseline intensity (background intensity) prior to the injection of contrast agent. When a plateau of the signal intensity-versus-time curve occurs, the derived peak signal intensity after injection of the contrast agent in the regions of interest and the baseline intensity (signal intensity at the origin of the curve) before injection of the contrast agent were obtained. The enhanced intensity was calculated by subtracting the baseline intensity from the derived peak signal intensity. The degree of enhancement of the plaque after injection of contrast material was investigated by measuring the enhanced intensity in the plaque and the ratio of the enhanced intensity in the plaque to that in the lumen of the abdominal aorta.