Gang Wang1, Anup K Biswas1, Wanchao Ma1, Manoj Kandpal2, Courtney Coker1, Paul M Grandgenett3, Michael A Hollingsworth3, Rinku Jain4, Kurenai Tanji5, Sara Lόpez-Pintado6, Alain Borczuk7, Doreen Hebert8, Supak Jenkitkasemwong9, Shintaro Hojyo10, Ramana V Davuluri2, Mitchell D Knutson9, Toshiyuki Fukada11, Swarnali Acharyya12,13,14. 1. Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. 4. Department of Structural & Chemical Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 5. Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 6. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 9. Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 10. Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin, Osteoimmunology, Berlin, Germany. 11. Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Japan. 12. Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. sa3141@cumc.columbia.edu. 13. Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. sa3141@cumc.columbia.edu. 14. Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. sa3141@cumc.columbia.edu.
Abstract
Patients with metastatic cancer experience a severe loss of skeletal muscle mass and function known as cachexia. Cachexia is associated with poor prognosis and accelerated death in patients with cancer, yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we identify the metal-ion transporter ZRT- and IRT-like protein 14 (ZIP14) as a critical mediator of cancer-induced cachexia. ZIP14 is upregulated in cachectic muscles of mice and in patients with metastatic cancer and can be induced by TNF-α and TGF-β cytokines. Strikingly, germline ablation or muscle-specific depletion of Zip14 markedly reduces muscle atrophy in metastatic cancer models. We find that ZIP14-mediated zinc uptake in muscle progenitor cells represses the expression of MyoD and Mef2c and blocks muscle-cell differentiation. Importantly, ZIP14-mediated zinc accumulation in differentiated muscle cells induces myosin heavy chain loss. These results highlight a previously unrecognized role for altered zinc homeostasis in metastatic cancer-induced muscle wasting and implicate ZIP14 as a therapeutic target for its treatment.
Patients with metastatic cancer experience a severe loss of skeletal muscle mass and function known as cachexia. Cachexia is associated with poor prognosis and accelerated death in patients with cancer, yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we identify the metal-ion transporter ZRT- and IRT-like protein 14 (ZIP14) as a critical mediator of cancer-induced cachexia. ZIP14 is upregulated in cachectic muscles of mice and in patients with metastatic cancer and can be induced by TNF-α and TGF-β cytokines. Strikingly, germline ablation or muscle-specific depletion of Zip14 markedly reduces muscle atrophy in metastatic cancer models. We find that ZIP14-mediated zinc uptake in muscle progenitor cells represses the expression of MyoD and Mef2c and blocks muscle-cell differentiation. Importantly, ZIP14-mediated zinc accumulation in differentiated muscle cells induces myosin heavy chain loss. These results highlight a previously unrecognized role for altered zinc homeostasis in metastatic cancer-induced muscle wasting and implicate ZIP14 as a therapeutic target for its treatment.
The vast majority of cancer-related deaths occur due to metastasis[1,2]. Lethality from metastasis can be attributed to two distinct
factors. First, the invasion and growth of metastatic cancer cells within different
organs can disrupt their normal physiological functions. Second, metastatic tumors
release soluble proteins, exosomes, and metabolites[3-5] that can systemically affect organs that are otherwise
cancer-free. For instance, cancer cells rarely metastasize to skeletal muscle, but
tumor-secreted factors induce extensive muscle wasting[3] resulting in a syndrome known as
cachexia[6,7]. Cachectic cancerpatients often become too
weak to tolerate standard doses of anti-cancer therapies, and those with wasting of
diaphragm and cardiac muscles often die prematurely due to respiratory and cardiac
failure[6,8]. Notably, cachexia shortens the survival of
cancerpatients with no approved drugs that can effectively alleviate this
condition[9].A characteristic feature of cancer cachexia is a reduction in muscle size
also known as muscle atrophy, a process characterized by marked deterioration of
cellular organelles, cytoplasm and proteins in muscles[10,11].
Indeed, enhanced breakdown of muscle proteins often accompanied by decreased
synthesis contribute to the altered muscle homeostasis and muscle mass loss in
cancer cachexia[6]. Although cachexia
is a key indicator of poor prognosis in cancerpatients, the underlying molecular
mechanisms of muscle wasting remain poorly understood.Cachexia is predominantly observed in advanced cancerpatients with
metastasis[3,12,13].
To identify new potential mediators and drivers of metastatic-cancer-induced
cachexia, we analyzed five independent metastatic models of colon, breast and lung
cancer, that gradually develop cachexia during metastatic progression. These
analyses identified a zinc transporter, solute carrier family 39, member 14
(Slc39a14, also known as Zip14), that was
significantly upregulated in the cachectic muscles from metastatic cancermouse
models and patients.Zinc is essential for normal growth and immune functions as well as the
activity of many transcription factors and enzymes[14,15].
Interestingly, excess zinc accumulation has been observed in cachectic muscles in
animal models and patients[16,17], but the mechanism driving this
accumulation and the consequence of muscle zinc overload during cancer metastasis
has not been studied. By manipulating Zip14 expression in
vivo using metastatic cancermouse models, we demonstrate that
ZIP14-mediated zinc influx in muscle cells is critical for the development of
cancer-induced cachexia. Our findings uncover a novel role for ZIP14 in promoting
muscle atrophy and potentially blocking muscle regeneration in metastatic
cancer.
RESULTS
Development of cachexia in metastatic cancer models
To investigate the mechanisms that drive muscle wasting during the
advanced stages of cancer[7,12], we performed allografts using
4T1 cells, a murine metastatic breast cancer cell line, and C26m2 cells, a
metastatic subline of C26 murinecolon cancer cells that we generated (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1a,b) by
in vivo selection[18]. To test whether C26m2 and 4T1 cells induce cachexia
during metastatic progression, we used a modified tumor-resection-and-relapse
approach[19] for
metastasis development (Supplementary Fig. 1c). To this end, we engineered each cell line to
express luciferase and implanted them subcutaneously. Resulting tumors were
resected two to three weeks later, after which bioluminescence imaging confirmed
no detectable signal at the implanted site (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Two to
three weeks following tumor removal, we detected distant metastases in C26m2-
and 4T1-implanted mice (Supplementary Fig. 1d) as well as a concomitant reduction in body
weight and grip strength (Fig. 1a, b).
Morphometric analysis of tibialis anterior muscle sections revealed that fiber
diameters were markedly reduced compared to control muscles from
non-tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 1c, d and
Supplementary Fig.
1e). Importantly, marker genes of muscle atrophy
(Trim63/MuRF1, MAFbx/Atrogin1/Fbxo32,
Fbxo31, and Musa1/Fbxo30) that encode
ubiquitin ligases[10,11] were transcriptionally upregulated in
the cachectic tibialis anterior and diaphragm muscles from the 4T1 and C26m2
metastasis models (Fig. 1e). The following
muscle groups also showed induction of the muscle atrophy genes: i) extensor
digitorum longus (EDL) muscles with a predominance of fast-twitch, glycolytic
fibers, ii) soleus muscles with a predominance of slow-twitch, oxidative fibers,
iii) gastrocnemius and quadriceps with mixed-fiber types, and iv) cardiac
muscles (Supplementary Fig.
1f-g). Notably, cachectic symptoms were not due to anorexia in either
model (Supplementary Fig. 1h,
i). These results indicate that, similar to humancancers[12,20,21], metastatic
C26m2 and 4T1 cancer cells systemically induce cachexia in muscle groups of
diverse fiber types. Furthermore, these metastatic models eliminate the physical
complications of a large tumor burden[12,22] and create a
protracted therapeutic window for testing potential anti-cachexia treatments in
the future.
Figure 1
Characterization of metastasis-induced cachexia models
(a) Mouse images (left) and body weight analysis (right) of tumor-bearing mice
(Tb) and non-tumor- bearing control (Con) mice. Using the
tumor-resection-and-relapse approach for spontaneous metastasis assay,
luciferase-labeled 4T1 or C26m2 cancer cells (derivation in Supplementary Fig. 1a,b) were
implanted subcutaneously and after 2-3 weeks of tumor growth, tumors were
surgically removed (as indicated by arrow). Metastasis was monitored by
bioluminescence imaging (see Supplementary Fig. 1c,d). Mice were euthanized with cachectic
symptoms such as a body condition score <1.5, reduced body weight and
hunched posture. n=9 for Tb (4T1), n=6 for Balb/c (Con);
n=9 for Tb (C26m2), n=10 for CD2F1 (Con).
(b) Hind-limb grip strength measurements of mice bearing 4T1 or C26m2 metastases
at 5 weeks post tumor-cell injection (n=5 mice per group). Values were
normalized to control.
(c,d) Representative immunofluorescence images (c) and associated morphometric
analysis (d) of cross- sections from tibialis anterior (TA) muscles harvested
from mice at 5 weeks post tumor-cell injection (see panel a), compared to their
respective non-tumor-bearing controls. (c) Sections immunostained with antibody
against laminin (shown in red) and stained with DAPI (shown in blue). Scale
bars, 50 μm. (d) Morphometric analysis is depicted as the distribution
frequency of fiber size categorized by fiber diameter. n=3 mice per
group for control and tumor-bearing mice for 4T1 model; n=4 controls and
n=3 tumor bearing mice for C26m2 model.
(e) Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of muscle atrophy markers
Trim63, MAFbx, Fbxo31, Musa1 in TA and
diaphragm muscles. For TA muscles, n=4 controls and n=7 mice
bearing 4T1 for Trim63 expression, n=4 controls and
n=6 mice bearing 4T1 for MAFbx expression, n=6
controls and n=7 mice bearing 4T1 for Fbxo31 and
Musa1 expression; n=5 controls and n=3 mice
bearing C26m2 for Trim63 and MAFbx expression,
n=5 controls and n=5 mice bearing C26m2 for
Fbxo31 and Musa1 expression. For diaphragm
muscles, n=6 mice per group for both 4T1 and C26m2 models.
Error bars represent SEM and all data were represented by mean ± SEM.
P values were determined by two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s t-test (a,b,e), and two-sided Welch’s t-test (d).
ZIP14 is upregulated in the cachectic muscles from metastatic models
To identify potential mechanisms mediating the development of cachexia in
the C26m2 and 4T1 metastatic models, we analyzed the transcriptome of their
cachectic tibialis anterior muscles by RNA sequencing (Fig. 2a). Unsupervised principal component analysis
showed that gene expression profiles from cachectic muscles segregated
independently from their respective controls (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Notably, we
observed significantly concordant transcriptional changes in the C26m2 and 4T1
models with 3140 common differentially expressed genes, indicative of
overlapping mechanisms (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Functional annotation clustering of the
common genes (Supplementary
Table 1) using DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and
Integrated Discovery) identified 5 clusters with upregulated genes (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 2a) and 4
clusters with downregulated genes (Supplementary Table 2b) with
enrichment scores (ES) ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.05).
Consistent with previous studies[23,24], a marked
enrichment in pathways associated with protein degradation (autophagy and
proteasome) was observed in cachectic muscles by the following three independent
analyses: i) functional annotation clustering using DAVID (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Table 2a), ii) Gene
Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) using KEGG pathway gene sets (Supplementary Fig. 2c), and iii)
quantitative RT-PCR for genes associated with ubiquitination,
ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosomal systems (Supplementary Fig. 2d-e).
Unexpectedly, genes associated with zinc binding and zinc transport were
significantly enriched in the cachectic muscles from the 4T1 and C26m2
metastasis models (ES = 12.08, p < 0.00001,
Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 2a). In
particular, the zinc transporter Slc39a14 (also known as
Zip14) was highly upregulated in the cachectic tibialis
anterior and diaphragm muscles and uniquely upregulated among multiple zinc
transporters (Fig. 2b-d, Supplementary Fig. 2f-g and Supplementary Table 1).
Zip14 upregulation was also observed in the cachectic
gastrocnemius, quadriceps, soleus, EDL and cardiac muscles (Supplementary Fig. 2h), indicative
of Zip14 upregulation in multiple muscle groups during cachexia
development.
Figure 2
The metal ion transporter gene Zip14 is upregulated in
cachectic muscles from both 4T1 and C26m2 metastatic mouse models
(a) Transcriptomic profiling by RNA-Seq analysis of tibialis anterior (TA)
muscles collected from mice with 4T1 or C26m2 metastases (Tb) or
non-tumor-bearing, age-matched controls (Con) at five weeks post tumor-cell
injection (see Fig. 1a). Supplementary Table 1 contains the
full list of differentially expressed genes common between the two models with
significant p values and q values
(cutoff=0.05), sorted by decreasing log2 fold change in C26m2 data.
Functionally annotated clusters were determined by DAVID (Database for
Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery) analysis using the common
differentially expressed genes between the 4T1 and C26m2 models, with a cutoff
of log2 fold change of 1.0 and significant p and
q values (see Supplementary Table 2). Significant
functional clusters of upregulated genes with an enrichment score (ES)
>5.0 and p value <0.05 are shown in (a).
n=2 controls and n=2 mice bearing 4T1 metastases; n=2
controls and n=2 mice bearing C26m2 metastases were used for
transcriptomic profiling and subsequent analysis.
(b) Top 10 upregulated genes in cachectic muscles from 4T1 and C26m2 metastasis
models (from analysis in panel a) sorted by decreasing log2 fold change (in
C26m2 data) with q-value cutoff of 0.05 are shown as an
alphabetically ordered heatmap.
(c) Expression levels of the Slc39 family of zinc influx
transporter genes in cachectic muscles from RNA-Seq analysis (from panel a) are
shown relative to their respective controls. Slc39a14 (Zrt- and
Irt-like protein 14, also known as Zip14) is highlighted in red
on the heatmaps (b, c).
(d) qRT-PCR analysis of Zip14 in TA muscles and diaphragm
muscles from Control (Con) or 4T1 and C26m2 tumor-bearing (Tb) mice. For TA
muscles, n=9 control mice and n=14 mice using the 4T1 model;
n=8 control mice and n=8 mice using the C26m2 model. For
diaphragm muscles, n=5 control mice and n=7 mice using the 4T1
model; n=6 control mice and n=5 mice using the C26m2 model.
Error bars represent SEM and all data were represented by mean ± SEM.
P-values in (a) were determined by one-tailed
Fisher’s exact test, and P-values were further
corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg’s procedure. P
values in (d) were determined by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t
test.
ZIP14 expression is associated with cachexia development in metastatic
patients and mouse models and can be upregulated by TGF-β and
TNF-α cytokines
To explore whether Zip14 upregulation is a common
phenomenon during metastasis-induced cachexia, we analyzed
genetically-engineered mouse models (GEMMs), xenograft and allograft models of
metastatic lung cancer[25]
(Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 3a). GEMMs of
metastatic lung cancer driven by conditional expression of
Kras combined with either
p53 or Lkb1 deletion[25], and a xenograft model of
EGFR-mutant PC9-BrM3humanlung cancer[26], showed body weight loss and signs of
muscle atrophy (Fig. 3a-b). Notably,
Zip14 was also induced in the cachectic muscles of these
metastatic models (Fig. 3b). In contrast,
upon conditional deletion of Pten and Lkb1 in
a lung cancer GEMM[27], which
developed significant primary tumor burden but no detectable metastases, there
was no marked weight loss or changes in the expression of muscle atrophy markers
or Zip14 at this timepoint (Supplementary Fig. 3a-c).
To test whether Zip14 expression can be induced by metastasis
in the absence of cachexia, we analyzed an allograft mouse model of metastatic
small cell lung cancer (SCLC) driven by conditional deletion of
Rb and p53 that fails to induce
cancer-associated muscle wasting (Fig. 3b
and Supplementary Fig.
3a, 3d-e). Our results (Fig. 2d and 3a-b) indicate that upregulation of Zip14 in muscle
is specifically associated with cachexia in diverse metastatic models across
several cancer types.
Figure 3
ZIP14 is upregulated in cachectic muscles from metastatic mouse models and
patients, and is induced by TNF-α and TGF-β
(a,b) Body weight measurements (a) and qRT-PCR analysis of
Trim63, MAFbx, Fbxo31,
Musa1 and Zip14 in TA muscles (b) derived
from four independent metastatic lung cancer models, compared to respective
age-matched controls. Metastatic models include conditional
Kras/p53 mutant
(KrasLSL-G12D/+-p53)
and Kras/Lkb1 mutant
(KrasLSL-G12D/+-Lkb1)
in which muscles were collected at 13 weeks post adeno-Cre induction, PC9-BrM3
xenograft in which muscles were collected at 7 weeks post tumor-cell injection,
and Rb/p53 mutant allografts in which muscles were collected at
6 weeks post tumor resection (see also Supplementary Fig. 3a). For body
weight analysis in (a), n=4 controls and n=8
Kras/p53 conditional mutant mice, n=3 controls and
n=6 Kras/Lkb1 conditional mutant mice, n=3
controls and n=10 PC9-BrM3 xenograft mice, and n=3 controls and
n=10 Rb/p53 mutant allograft mice. For qRT-PCR analysis
in (b), n=6 controls and n=4 Kras/p53
conditional mutant mice, n=3 controls and n=4
Kras/Lkb1 conditional mutant mice, n=4 controls and
n=5 PC9-BrM3 xenograft mice, and n=5 controls and n=4
Rb/p53 mutant allograft model mice.
(c) Representative images of ZIP14 immunohistochemistry on human muscle
cross-sections from non-cachectic (upper panel) and cachectic (lower panel)
metastatic cancer patients. ZIP14 antibody details are shown in Supplementary Fig. 3f-h. Scale
bars, 50 μm. ca, cancer. Patient details are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Data is
representative of three independent experiments.
(d) qRT-PCR analysis of Zip14 in human skeletal primary muscle
cells treated with either vehicle, TNF-α (50 ng/ml), TGF-β (10
ng/ml), or both TNF-α (50 ng/ml) + TGF-β (10 ng/ml),
either alone (vehicle) or in the presence of 10 μM of the indicated
inhibitors. Cells were pretreated with either vehicle or the indicated
inhibitors for 1 hour prior to adding the cytokines (TGF-β for 9 hours,
and TNF-α for 3 hours before harvest). Cells from all groups were
harvested at the same time. n=6 samples for cells treated with vehicle,
TGF-β alone or TNF-α together with TGFβ; n=4
samples for all the other groups. Inhibitors: NF-κBi =
NF-κB inhibitor (BAY 11-7085); AP1i = AP1 inhibitor (CC401);
Smadi = TGFβ receptor I inhibitor (SB431542).
(e,f) qRT-PCR analysis of Zip14 in TA muscles after neutralizing
antibody treatment. Following the tumor-resection-and-relapse approach (see
Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1c), mice
injected with either 4T1 (e) or C26m2 tumor cells (f) were treated with either
an isotype control antibody, or a neutralizing antibody against TNF-α,
TGF-β, or both (200 μg antibody per mouse treated three times a
week) starting one week after surgery, for a period of one week. For 4T1 model,
n=8 non-tumor bearing control mice, n=5 tumor bearing mice
treated with isotype control, n=6 tumor bearing mice treated with
TNF-α antibody, n=7 tumor bearing mice treated with
TGF-β antibody, and n=3 tumor bearing mice treated with both
TNF-α and TGF-β antibodies. For C26m2 model, n=5
non-tumor bearing control mice, n=6 tumor bearing mice treated with
isotype control, n=4 tumor bearing mice treated with TNF-α
antibody, n=3 tumor bearing mice treated with TGF-β antibody,
and n=5 tumor bearing mice treated with both TNF-α and
TGF-β antibodies.
Error bars represent SEM and all data were represented by mean ± SEM.
P values were determined by two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s t test in (a, b) and with one-way ANOVA with post-hoc
Tukey’s test in (d-f) with F value (DFn, DFb) for d F(9, 36) =
161.9, e F(4, 24) = 10.3, and f F(4, 18) = 20.7. n.s., not
significant. *P<0.05,
**P<0.01,
***P<0.001 and
****P<0.0001. Con,
non-tumor bearing control; Tb, tumor-bearing.
To next evaluate the clinical relevance of Zip14
upregulation in humancancer cachexia, we performed immunohistochemical analyses
on muscle sections from advanced cancerpatients with metastatic disease.
Blinded pathological examination revealed that 19 of 43 cancerpatients with
cachexia showed specific ZIP14 staining in atrophic muscle fibers compared to 8
of 53 non-cachectic cancerpatients (Pearson’s Chi-square test,
P= 0.002, Fig.
3c, Supplementary
Fig. 3f-h, Supplementary Table 3). Importantly, ZIP14 staining was low in the
non-atrophic fibers in muscles from both non-cachectic and cachectic cancerpatients (Fig. 3c). Two additional
anti-ZIP14 antibodies validated these findings (Supplementary Fig. 3i). Thus, ZIP14
protein is significantly elevated in the atrophic muscles of metastatic cancerpatients with cachexia.To identify soluble factors that can upregulate Zip14
during cachexia, we analyzed the upstream signaling pathways in cachectic
muscles by Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA). We queried the list of
differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Table 1) in cachectic
muscles common to the 4T1 and C26m2 metastasis models for upstream
transcriptional regulators (Supplementary Fig. 3j and Supplementary Table 4, 5). We
tested candidate pathways and found that treatment of human primary muscle cells
and murine C2C12 myoblasts with recombinant TNF-α and TGF-β
proteins significantly induced Zip14 expression (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 3k).
Importantly, Zip14 expression was blocked in both human primary
muscle cells and murine C2C12 cells by inhibition of TNF-α -induced
NF-κB activation with Bay11-7085 (but not by inhibition of TNF-α
-induced c-Jun/AP1 activation with CC-401) and by inhibition of
TGF-β-induced Smad phosphorylation with the TGF-βRI Kinase
inhibitor SB431542 (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 3k-m).
TNF-α and TGF-β cytokines are intricately linked to cancer
metastasis[28,29] and were detected in the C26m2 and 4T1
metastatic tumor microenvironments (Supplementary Fig. 3n-o). Moreover, elevated levels of
TNF-α and TGF-β cytokines have been reported in the serum of
mouse models and patients with advanced cancers and are known to activate many
cachexia-promoting signaling pathways[3,28,30,31]. Importantly, neutralization of TGF-β and
TNF-α cytokines using a pan-TGF-β neutralizing antibody (clone
1D11) or TNF-α neutralizing antibody (clone XT3.11) reduced
Zip14 expression in the tibialis anterior muscles in 4T1
and C26m2 metastasis models (Fig. 3e-f) and
was associated with a concomitant reduction in Smad2 phosphorylation and
NF-κB activation (Supplementary Fig. 3p-q). These findings suggest that TGF-β
and TNF-α cytokines contribute to ZIP14 upregulation in cachectic
muscles in metastatic cancer.
ZIP14 upregulation and zinc accumulation in muscle mediates cancer-induced
cachexia
To determine whether ZIP14 is required for the development of
cancer-induced cachexia, we implanted cancer cells subcutaneously into
Zip14 germline knockout and wild-type mice and evaluated
the effects of ZIP14 loss (Fig. 4a-c, Supplementary Fig. 4a).
Zip14 knockout mice are viable but display dwarfism,
scoliosis, shortened bones, defective cartilage formation and behavioral
problems[32]. Upon tumor
implantation, Zip14 knockout and wild-type mice developed
metastasis with similar tumor growth (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Notably,
Zip14-deficientmice were significantly resistant to
cancer-induced muscle wasting (Fig. 4a-c
and Supplementary Fig.
4c-d). Examination of gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior and EDL
muscles revealed no change in the distribution of oxidative and glycolytic
fibers, fiber- type switching, or vascularization between wild-type and
Zip14-knockout mice in the presence or absence of tumor
burden, as determined by succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) staining, immunostaining
analysis using antibodies against myosin heavy chain isoforms, and quantitation
of CD31+ capillaries/fiber by immunostaining analysis,
respectively (Supplementary
Fig. 4e-h and data not shown). These results suggest that ZIP14
mediates cancer-induced muscle wasting.
Figure 4
ZIP14-mediated zinc uptake in muscles promotes metastatic-cancer-induced
cachexia
(a,b) Representative immunofluorescence images (a) and associated morphometric
analysis (b) of cross- sections of gastrocnemius muscles harvested from mice at
5 weeks post 4T1-cell injection. (a) Sections immunostained with antibody
against laminin (shown in green) and stained with DAPI (shown in blue). Scale
bars, 50 μm. (b) Morphometric analysis is depicted as the distribution
frequency of fiber size categorized by fiber diameter. n=4 WT control
mice, and n=3 mice for all other groups.
(c) qRT-PCR analysis of the indicated atrophy markers in gastrocnemius, tibialis
anterior or diaphragm muscles from Zip14 wild-type (WT) and
Zip14-knockout (KO) mice, with or without 4T1 tumor-cell
injection, collected five weeks post injection. For gastrocnemius muscles,
n=7 WT controls, n=5 WT mice bearing 4T1, n=6 KO mice
and n=7 KO mice bearing 4T1 for analyzing Trim63
expression; n=7 WT controls, n=6 WT mice bearing 4T1,
n=6 KO mice and n=8 KO mice bearing 4T1 for
MAFbx expression; n=7 WT controls, n=5 WT
mice bearing 4T1, n=6 KO mice and n=9 KO mice for
Fbxo31 expression, n=7 WT controls, n=7 WT
mice bearing 4T1, n=6 KO mice and n=10 KO mice bearing 4T1 for
Musa1 expression. For TA muscles, n=7 WT controls,
n=6 WT mice bearing 4T1, n=5 KO mice and n=7 KO mice
bearing 4T1 for Trim63 and MAFbx expression;
n=5 WT controls, n=5 WT mice bearing 4T1, n=5 KO mice
and n=8 KO mice for Fbxo31 expression, n=5 WT
controls, n=6 WT mice bearing 4T1, n=5 KO mice and n=8
KO mice bearing 4T1 for Musa1 expression. For diaphragm
muscles, n=3 per group. Data were normalized to non-tumor- bearing
Zip14 WT mice.
(d) AAV vectors expressing mCherry and a shRNA targeting either a scrambled
sequence (shCon) or Zip14 (shZip14) were
injected intramuscularly into the gastrocnemius muscles and monitored by
fluorescence imaging. A representative image taken five weeks after injection of
AAV particles intramuscularly is shown in the upper panel. C26m2 cancer cells
were then subcutaneously injected, and metastasis was monitored as previously
described (see Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1c). Muscles
were collected five weeks after tumor-cell injection, and Zip14
expression was determined by qRT-PCR analysis (lower panel). n=4 mice
per group. Data were normalized to shCon.
(e,f) Representative immunofluorescence staining images of laminin (e) and
morphometric analysis of muscle size in gastrocnemius muscles from C26m2
tumor-bearing (Tb) mice injected with either shCon or shZip14
(f). (e) Sections immunostained with antibody against laminin (shown in green)
and stained with DAPI (shown in blue). Scale bars, 50 μm. (f)
Morphometric analysis is depicted as the distribution frequency of fiber size
categorized by fiber diameter. n=3 mice for shCon, and n=4 mice
for shZip14.
(g) qRT-PCR analysis of the indicated genes in gastrocnemius muscles from C26m2
tumor-bearing (Tb) mice shown in (d), n=4 mice per group. Data were
normalized to shCon.
(h) Zinc levels in gastrocnemius (gast), TA and diaphragm (dia) muscles
(μg/g of dry weight) determined by
inductively-coupled-plasma-mass-spectrometry (ICP/MS) analysis from either
non-tumor-bearing control mice or mice bearing either 4T1 or C26m2 metastases
collected at 5 weeks post tumor-cell injection. For 4T1 model, n=7
controls and n=8 tumor bearing mice for gastrocnemius muscles;
n=4 controls and n=6 tumor bearing mice for TA muscles;
n=3 mice per group for diaphragm muscles. For C26m2 model, n=7
mice per group for gastrocnemius muscles; n=3 mice per group for TA
muscles; n=8 controls and n=10 tumor bearing mice for diaphragm
muscles.
(i,j) Body weight analysis (i) and qRT-PCR analysis of the indicated genes in TA
muscles (j) of Zip14 wild-type (WT) and Zip14
knockout (KO) mice, either injected with C26m2 cancer cells or left uninjected
as non-tumor-bearing controls. Mice were subdivided into two groups on the day
of tumor cell injection and treated with either normal or zinc-supplemented
drinking water for the indicated number of days in (i). TA muscles were
harvested for qRT-PCR analysis after 15 days on zinc-supplemented water in (j).
For body weight analysis (i), n=8 mice for WT, Tb-WT and
Tb-WT+Zn; n=7 mice for WT+Zn; n=4 mice for KO,
KO+Zn and Tb-KO; n=5 for Tb-KO+Zn. For gene expression
analysis (j), n=5 WT mice, n=3 WT+Zn mice, n=3
Tb-WT mice, n=7 Tb-WT+Zn mice, n=3 KO mice, n=3
KO+Zn mice, n=3 Tb-KO mice and n=4 Tb-KO+Zn mice
for analyzing Trim63 and MAFbx; n=5 WT
mice, n=3 WT+Zn mice, n=3 Tb-WT mice, n=7
Tb-WT+Zn, n=4 KO mice, n=3 KO+Zn mice,
n=4 Tb-KO mice and n=4 Tb-KO+Zn mice for analyzing
Fbxo31 and Musa1. Data in (j) were
normalized to non-tumor- bearing Zip14 WT mice on regular water
without zinc supplementation.
Error bars represent SEM and all data were represented by mean ± SEM.
P values were determined by two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s t-test in (d, g, h and i), two-sided Welch’s t-test in
(b and f), and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test in (c and j)
with F value (DFn, DFd) for c Trim63-Gastrocnemius F(3, 21)
= 221.0, c Trim63-TA F(3, 21) = 13.7, c
Trim63-Diaphragm F(3, 8) = 39.1, c
MAFbx-Gastrocnemius F(3, 23) = 101.0, c
MAFbx-TA F(3, 21) = 10.4, c
MAFbx-Diaphragm F(3, 8) = 17.3, c
Fbxo31-Gastrocnemius F(3, 23) = 41.2, c
Fbxo31-TA F(3, 19) = 11.6, c
Fbxo31-Diaphragm F(3, 8) = 16.3, c
Musa1-Gastrocnemius F(3, 26) = 12.3, c
Musa1-TA F(3, 20) = 22.2, c
Musa1-Diaphragm F(3, 8) = 11.2, j
Trim63 F(7, 23) = 8.5, j MAFbx
F(7, 23) = 10.0, j Fbxo31 F(7, 25) = 51.5, j
Musa1 F(7, 25) = 10.7. n.s., not significant.
**P<0.01,
***P<0.001 and
**** P<0.0001. Con,
control; Tb, tumor-bearing.
To rule out secondary effects of germline Zip14 loss,
we depleted Zip14 levels in muscles by short-hairpin (sh),
RNA-mediated knockdown and determined its effect on cancer-induced cachexia. To
this end, we transduced gastrocnemius muscles with an adeno-associated virus
(AAV) expressing mCherry (to confirm successful transduction) in combination
with either a shRNA targeting Zip14 (shZip14),
or a scrambled control (shCon, Fig. 4d). We
injected a group of these mice with C26m2 cancer cells and monitored metastasis
and cachexia development (as shown in Fig.
1a and Supplementary Fig. 1c) while remaining mice were used as
non-tumor-bearing controls. We confirmed Zip14 knockdown in
muscles by both qRT-PCR and immunostaining analysis (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 4i,
respectively). Consistent with the Zip14 knockout findings
(Fig. 4a-c), Zip14
knockdown in muscles was also associated with a significant rescue of
cancer-induced muscle atrophy (Fig. 4e-g
and Supplementary Fig.
4j). No differences in tumor burden (Supplementary Fig. 4k),
distribution of oxidative and glycolytic fibers, fiber-type, and vascularization
were observed between the shCon and sh-Zip14 groups (Supplementary Fig. 4l-n).
In contrast, Zip14 depletion in the muscles of normal mice had
no prominent phenotype without any tumor burden (Supplementary Fig. 4o-s). These
findings support that muscle-specific Zip14 expression is
required for muscle wasting in the context of metastatic cancer.Based on the induction of genes encoding zinc-binding proteins in
cachectic muscles (Fig. 2a-b) and the
ability of ZIP14 to transport zinc in other tissues[33], we asked whether ZIP14 imports zinc
into muscle cells. Indeed, mice harboring C26m2 and 4T1 metastases showed
aberrant accumulation of zinc in the cachectic muscles (gastrocnemius, tibialis
anterior, diaphragm, quadriceps, soleus, EDL, and cardiac) with a concomitant
reduction in the serum zinc levels (Fig. 4h
and Supplementary Fig.
4t), as determined by inductively-coupled-plasma mass spectrometry
(ICP-MS). Consistent with these findings, higher intracellular zinc levels were
detected in single myofibers isolated from cachectic mice, as analyzed by
laser-ablation inductively-coupled-plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) (Supplementary Fig. 4u).
In contrast, tumor-bearing Zip14-null mice showed no additional
zinc accumulation in muscles compared to non-tumor-bearing
Zip14-null mice (Supplementary Fig. 4v). To
determine whether overexpression of ZIP14 can augment zinc uptake in muscle
cells, we expressed either GFP (control) or
Zip14 in C2C12 myoblasts (Supplementary Fig. 4w). We next
added zinc to the culture media and measured its uptake using a FluoZin-3
fluorescence based assay. Irrespective of differentiation status,
Zip14-expressing C2C12 cells showed a marked increase in
zinc uptake, as measured by its reduction in culture media (Supplementary Fig. 4w). These
results demonstrate that ZIP14 likely functions as a zinc transporter in muscle
cells.We next reasoned that if ZIP14-mediated zinc uptake promotes the
development of cancer-induced cachexia, then excess zinc should exacerbate
muscle wasting in the context of cancer. In the absence of tumors, zinc
supplementation had no detrimental effect on the growth kinetics of
Zip14-wild-type and knockout mice (Fig. 4i). Strikingly, excess zinc induced a
substantial acceleration in body weight loss and an increase in muscle atrophy
in Zip14-wild-type, but not Zip14-knockout,
tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 4i-j). No changes
in food or water intake, behavior, liver or kidney function were observed in
tumor-bearing mice with excess zinc supplementation thereby ruling out acute
toxicity effects (Supplementary Fig. 4x). The Zip14/zinc-mediated
cachexia was also not secondary to altered tumor burden since tumor volume was
comparable between Zip14 WT and KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 4y). These
results indicate that excess zinc promotes muscle wasting in mice specifically
in the presence of Zip14 and cachexia- inducing metastatic
tumors.
ZIP14-mediated zinc uptake blocks muscle-cell differentiation and induces
myosin heavy chain loss
To understand how excess zinc might perturb muscle homeostasis and
mediate muscle atrophy, we first examined which cell types in cachectic muscles
express ZIP14. To this end, we purified progenitor subpopulations in
muscles[34] by magnetic
and flow-cytometry-assisted sorting (Fig.
5a and Supplementary Fig. 5a). In muscles from both C26m2 and 4T1
metastasis models, Zip14 was specifically induced in
CD45−/CD31−/Sca1−/CD34+/α7-integrin+
cells (Fig. 5a), which comprise the muscle
satellite-cell population associated with cachexia[34], and confirmed this finding in human
muscle satellite cells expressing PAX7 (Supplementary Fig. 5b). We also
observed ZIP14 expression in mature, differentiated myofibers from cachectic
muscles in the C26m2 metastasis model (Fig.
5b). Therefore, ZIP14-mediated zinc accumulation may negatively
impact both the process of muscle-cell differentiation and the function of
differentiated muscle fibers.
Figure 5
ZIP14-mediated zinc accumulation blocks muscle-cell differentiation and
induces myosin heavy chain loss
(a) qRT-PCR analysis of Zip14 expression in purified muscle
progenitor subpopulations from either non-tumor-bearing control mice (Con) or
mice bearing 4T1 or C26m2 metastases (Tb) harvested five weeks after tumor-cell
injection (see Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1c).
CD45−CD31−CD34+Sca1+and
CD45−CD31−CD34+integrin-α7+cells
were purified from gastrocnemius muscles using a combination of magnetic and
flow-cytometry-assisted sorting (see Supplementary Fig. 5a). For 4T1
model, n=4 control mice for isolated
CD34+Sca1+ cells and n=3 mice
for the other groups. For C26m2 model, n=3 mice per group.
(b) ZIP14 immunofluorescence analysis using muscle sections from either
non-tumor-bearing control mice or mice bearing C26m2 metastases five weeks after
tumor-cell injection. ZIP14 (red), DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm. Boxed
area in upper panels is magnified in the corresponding lower panels. A
representative image from three independent experiments is shown.
(c,d) Immunofluorescence analysis showing myosin heavy chain (MyHC) expression in
C2C12 myoblasts infected with adenovirus expressing either control (Adeno-Con)
or Zip14 cDNA (Adeno-Zip14) and differentiated
for 6 days, either with 0 or 50 μM ZnCl2 (zinc) replenished
daily. Representative images and quantitation (d) are shown. Scale bars, 25
μm. Data presented as percentage of MyHC fluorescence signal in
corresponding untreated myotubes (d). Data representative of three independent
experiments (c,d).
(e) qRT-PCR analysis of MyoD, Myf5 and
Mef2c expression in untreated and zinc-treated C2C12 cells
expressing either Adeno-Con or Adeno-Zip14, represented as a
heatmap. Adenovirus-infected C2C12 cells were differentiated for 2 days and then
treated with either 0 or 50 μM ZnCl2 (zinc) for 24 hours.
Data is representative of four independent experiments.
(f) RNA-Seq analysis of MyoD, Myf5 and
Mef2c expression shown as heatmap (RNA seq shown in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1) comparing TA
muscles from non-tumor-bearing control mice to mice bearing 4T1 or C26m2
metastases, collected 5 weeks post tumor-cell injection.
(g) MyHC and tropomyosin (Tm) protein expression by immunoblot analysis in C2C12
cells infected with adenovirus expressing either control or
Zip14 cDNA and differentiated for 3 days followed by
treatment with either 0 or 50 μM ZnCl2 for 24 hours. Data is
representative of three independent experiments. Uncropped immunoblot images are
shown in Supplementary Fig.
6.
(h) Immunoblot analysis probing for MyHC and Tm in gastrocnemius muscles from
mice intramuscularly injected with adeno-associated virus expressing either
shCon or shZip14 and subsequently injected with C26m2 cancer
cells (see Fig. 4d). Age-matched,
non-tumor-bearing mice were used as a control. Data is representative of three
independent experiments. Uncropped immunoblot images are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.
(i) Immunoblot analysis probing for MyHC and Tm in gastrocnemius muscles from the
indicated groups. Muscles were isolated from Zip14 WT and KO
mice with (Tb) or without (Con) 4T1 metastases. Another cohort of
Zip14 KO mice were injected intramuscularly with AAV-Con
(mCherry) or AAV-Zip14 in the
gastrocnemius muscle and injected four weeks later with 4T1 tumor cells. All
mice were harvested 5 weeks post tumor-cell injection. Data is representative of
three independent experiments. Uncropped immunoblot images are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.
Error bars represent SEM and all data were represented by mean ± SEM.
P values in (a,d) were determined by two-tailed, unpaired
Student’s t test. Con, control; Tb, tumor-bearing; Tm, Tropomyosin.
(j) Working model: During cancer progression and metastasis development,
cytokines such as TNF-α and TGF-β upregulate the expression of
Zip14, a metal ion transporter, in muscle progenitor and
mature muscle cells. This causes an aberrant accumulation of zinc in these
muscle cells. ZIP14 expression and zinc uptake in muscle progenitor cells
represses key myogenic genes such as MyoD and
Mef2c, and blocks muscle differentiation. ZIP14 expression
in mature muscle cells causes myosin heavy chain loss, which promotes
cancer-induced muscle atrophy in metastatic cancers. Tf, tumor factors; Ca,
cancer cells; Nr, normal cells.
Normal muscles respond to muscle injury by activation and proliferation
of muscle progenitor cells into myoblasts that differentiate to regenerate new
muscle fibers[35] (Supplementary Fig. 5c).
In contrast, in conditions associated with muscle atrophy including in cancer,
muscles are damaged followed by proliferation of muscle progenitor cells, which
eventually fail to differentiate[34,36] (Supplementary Fig. 5c).
We first tested whether aberrant Zip14 upregulation and
consequent zinc influx in muscle progenitor cells affects normal differentiation
using C2C12 myoblasts and primary myoblasts (Fig.
5c-d and Supplementary Fig. 5d-f). Both cell types were infected with
adenovirus expressing either GFP (Adeno-Con) or
Zip14 (Adeno-Zip14), (Supplementary Figs. 4w and
5e). Each group differentiated normally in the absence of zinc as
assessed by expression of myosin heavy chain (MyHC, Fig. 5c-d and Supplementary Fig. 5e) and cellular
morphology (Supplementary Fig.
5f). In contrast, in the presence of zinc, the differentiation of
Zip14-expressing myoblasts was selectively blocked (Fig. 5c-d and Supplementary Fig. 5e-f) with no
loss in viability (Supplementary Fig. 5g-h). These findings suggest that ZIP14-mediated
zinc uptake in muscle progenitor cells interferes with muscle-cell
differentiation.Myoblasts deficient in the myogenic transcription factors
MyoD and Mef2 can proliferate, but are
unable to differentiate[35,37]. We therefore considered the
possibility that excess zinc could repress the levels, or activity of, myogenic
transcription factors to block muscle-cell differentiation. Indeed, treatment of
Zip14-expressing C2C12 myoblasts with zinc led to
transcriptional repression of MyoD, Mef2c, and
Myf5 (Fig. 5e) but not
Cyclin D1 (Supplementary Fig. 5i), which
controls proliferation and cell-cycle exit of myoblasts[38,39]. Furthermore, GSEA using HALLMARK-MYOGENESIS gene sets
querying the cachexia signature derived from C26m2 and 4T1 metastasis models
(Supplementary Table
1, Supplementary
Fig. 5j) was supportive of repressed myogenesis in cachectic
muscles[31].
Consistently, MyoD and Mef2c expression was
downregulated (Fig. 5f) in cachectic
muscles from C26m2 and 4T1 metastasis models, compared to non-tumor bearing
controls (Supplementary Table
1). These findings identified a potential link between ZIP14-induced
zinc accumulation in muscle progenitor cells and impaired muscle regeneration in
the context of metastatic cancer.Finally, we questioned whether ZIP14-mediated zinc accumulation in the
mature muscle fibers (Fig. 5b) of cachectic
muscles mediates cancer-induced muscle atrophy. Myofibrils constitute the
organizational units in muscle with aligned thick and thin filaments that
facilitate muscle contraction[10]. Myofibrillar proteins comprise over 70% of muscle
proteins, and their reduced synthesis or loss negatively affects fiber size and
function[6,40]. We therefore asked whether
ZIP14-mediated zinc influx affects myofibrillar protein levels. To this end, we
first differentiated Zip14-expressing and control myoblasts
into myotubes. Myotubes were treated with zinc for 24 hours and myofibrillar
proteins were extracted using high-salt lysis method[41]. A striking loss in MyHC protein was
observed in Zip14-expressing myotubes treated with zinc by
immunoblot analysis (Fig. 5g), which was
confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis (Supplementary Fig. 5k-l). In
contrast, no major reduction in the thin filament proteins skeletal actin,
tropomyosin and troponin, the intermediate filament protein desmin, and the
thick filament protein myosin light chain (MyLC) were detected under these
conditions (Fig. 5g, Supplementary Figs. 5k-m and 6).
Furthermore, fractionation of muscle proteins showed that both the soluble and
myofibrillar fractions of MyHC predominantly decreased in
Zip14-expressing myotubes with zinc treatment over other
myofibrillar proteins (Supplementary Fig. 5n). These results suggest that ZIP14-mediated
zinc accumulation induces the loss of both soluble and sarcomeric MyHC in mature
muscle cells.The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is one of the central pathways
that regulate MyHC turnover in muscle atrophy states[10,40,42,43], and loss of MyHC is associated with
loss of muscle mass and function during cancer cachexia[44]. Therefore, we asked whether
ubiquitin-mediated proteosomal degradation promotes MyHC loss in the context of
ZIP14-mediated zinc influx and cancer-induced muscle wasting. Indeed, MyHC loss
in differentiated C2C12 cells was associated with upregulation of
Trim63, Psma1, Psmc4,
Psmd11 and Ubc UPS pathway genes (Supplementary Fig. 5o)
and could be blocked by the proteasome inhibitor, MG132 (Supplementary Fig. 5p). Consistent
with our in-vitro studies, MyHC levels in cachectic muscles
from the metastasis models were restored to normal in response to either
Zip14 knockdown (C26m2 model, Fig. 5h) or loss (4T1 model, Fig.
5i) with no reduction in the expression of the other myofibrillar
proteins examined (Supplementary Figs. 5q). To confirm the specificity of MyHC
regulation in vivo by Zip14, we re-expressed
Zip14 in Zip14-deficient muscles. To this
end, we transduced the gastrocnemius muscles of Zip14 germline
knockout mice with AAV-expressing Zip14 or
mCherry as a control (Supplementary Fig. 5r).
We implanted 4T1 cancer cells subcutaneously and evaluated the effects of
Zip14 re-expression in muscle during cancer-induced
cachexia. Importantly, expression of Zip14 in muscles
reestablished the muscle atrophy phenotype in tumor-bearing
Zip14-deficientmice (Supplementary Fig. 5s-u) resulting
in significant MyHC loss (Fig. 5i). No
changes in the other myofibrillar proteins, fiber type or vascularization were
observed (Fig. 5i, Supplementary Fig. 5v-w). In
addition, MyHC levels did not change with Zip14 expression in
the muscles from non-tumor-bearing mice, which underline the importance of the
tumor-context in Zip14 function (Supplementary Fig. 5x-y). These
results suggest that Zip14 mediates muscle atrophy through MyHC
loss in metastatic cancer.
DISCUSSION
Our understanding of cancer has expanded from a focus on strictly
cell-autonomous processes to a complex interplay involving cell-extrinsic,
reciprocal interactions with the tumor microenvironment[1]. It is now clear that cancer evolves as a
systemic disease, where the influence of the tumor extends far beyond the site of
tumor growth and invasion[4,5]. Our study was designed to identify essential
molecules or signaling pathways that could potentially be targeted to alleviate this
devastating side effect of metastatic cancer. We demonstrate that zinc accumulates
in the skeletal muscles, far from the actual site of metastatic tumor growth,
through aberrant upregulation of the ZIP14metal-ion transporter, and this
phenomenon is a critical mediator of metastasis-induced cachexia (Fig. 5j). Our studies could provide a basis for the design
of anti-cachexia therapies that target ZIP14 in patients with metastatic
cancers.Zinc homeostasis is perturbed in many advanced humancancers. For instance,
serum zinc levels were significantly reduced in metastatic cancerpatients[45], but whether this correlated with
an increase in zinc uptake by other tissues was not explored. In a pilot clinical
study, muscle zinc levels nearly doubled in cachectic cancerpatients with
>9.5% body weight loss[17], although these clinical observations were not further
investigated. Excess zinc accumulation in muscles has also been previously reported
in animal models of cancer-induced cachexia[16,17,46]. Interestingly, redistribution of zinc has
been reported in response to administration of IL-1α, glucagon and
epinephrine, and six hours following IL-1α administration in mice, a
transient reduction (up to 25%) in plasma zinc levels correlated with a
dramatic increase in zinc uptake in liver, bone marrow and thymus[47]. However, the kinetics of zinc
tissue redistribution in the context of tumor progression has not yet been studied.
This information will be key to understanding how the systemic regulation of ZIP14
expression affects metastasis-induced muscle atrophy. Aberrant zinc regulation may
also be an underlying cause of other muscle-wasting pathologies such as
dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy[48] and muscular dystrophy[49], but whether upregulation of ZIP14 also contributes to the
development of these muscle-wasting conditions remains to be further explored. It is
well established that metallothioneins (MT), which are cysteine-rich metal binding
proteins, function in cellular zinc homeostasis[15]. Interestingly, Mt1 and
Mt2 are upregulated in muscle atrophic conditions, and their
loss promotes muscle hypertrophy[48,50]. Moreover, metallothionein
deficiency can protect from glucocorticoid-induced atrophy[48]. In line with these findings, our studies
show a robust induction of Mt1 and Mt2 in
cachectic muscles from metastasis mouse models (Fig.
2b), which is supportive of the perturbed zinc homeostasis in these
muscles. It will be interesting to further investigate the contribution of
metallothioneins and other molecules involved in zinc regulation to the development
of metastasis-induced cachexia. Therefore, the ability to manipulate zinc influx
into muscle cells therefore has potentially far-reaching implications for a number
of muscle diseases.Since we found that ZIP14 is upregulated in cachectic muscles in both mouse
models and metastatic cancerpatients across multiple cancer types, it is likely
that common metastasis-associated factors regulate its expression. Previous studies
showed that Zip14 is induced in liver cells in response to
infection, tissue injury, inflammation and chronic diseases by pro-inflammatory
cytokines such as IL-6 and IL1-β[15,33]. Here, we
identify TGF-β and TNF-α, two cytokines that are associated with
metastatic cancers[3,28,51],
as likely inducers of Zip14 expression in muscle. However, since
neutralization of TGF-β and/or TNF-α cytokines in metastatic models
significantly reduced but did not completely abrogate Zip14
expression, it is possible that additional as-yet-unidentified metastasis-associated
factors contribute to its upregulation in muscles.Our study suggests that ZIP14 upregulation in muscle cells serves as a
driver of metastasis-induced muscle atrophy rather than arising as an indirect
consequence of muscle wasting. The key findings that are supportive of this notion
are that loss of Zip14 dramatically reduced muscle atrophy in our
metastatic cancer models and its re-expression restored it. It is important to note,
however, that in the absence of tumor burden, overexpression of
Zip14 in muscle is not sufficient to induce muscle wasting,
which implies that zinc, and potentially other metastasis-induced co-factors,
collaborate with ZIP14 to induce cachexia. It is also likely that other minerals
such as calcium, magnesium, manganese and/or iron impact the process of cachexia
development. Interestingly, ZIP14 has been implicated in iron and manganese
transport in liver and brain, respectively[15,52], however this
function of ZIP14 has not yet been explored in muscle. In the context of bone
metastases, calcium mishandling through the TGF-β-Nox4/RyR1 axis has been
shown to reduce force generation and promote muscle weakness[3]. These studies suggest that cachexia
development is likely regulated by multiple factors in metastatic cancers.A prominent characteristic of muscle atrophy is a cellular shift toward
protein catabolism, which is largely mediated by the activation of the
ubiquitin-mediated proteasome and autophagy pathways[10,40,53]. Consistent with previous
studies[43,44,53],
we found that cachectic muscles from metastatic mouse models showed robust
transcriptional upregulation of atrophy-associated genes of the ubiquitin-
proteasome and autophagy-lysosome degradation pathways along with a reduction in the
myofibrillar protein, MyHC. Importantly, MyHC loss in muscles has been observed in
cachectic patients and animal models[41,44,54,55],
suggesting that this typically abundant myofibrillar protein greatly impacts muscle
size and function. In particular, its loss in diaphragm muscles may underlie
respiratory failure in cancerpatients[41]. MyHC loss can be triggered in response to several
atrophy-inducing factors such as TNF-α and IFN-γ cytokines[44], the glucocorticoid
dexamethasone[43] and as
presented here, with aberrant ZIP14 upregulation and zinc accumulation in muscle. It
is interesting to note that in denervation-induced atrophy, the degradation of thick
filament proteins, such as Myosin Binding Protein C (MyBP-C) and MyLC 1 and 2,
occurs prior to MyHC loss in a Trim63-dependent manner[42]. In the context of our studies demonstrating
the loss of MyHC in zinc-treated Zip14-expressing myotubes
in vitro and in metastasis-induced cachectic muscles in
vivo, the events that mediate MyHC loss, the order of disassembly of
the other myofibrillar components, and the specific role of the UPS/autophagy
components in this regulation remains to be further investigated.Zinc can serve as an intracellular signaling molecule[56], and 10% of the encoded proteins in
the human genome are predicted to bind zinc through zinc finger motifs[57]. Moreover, zinc functions as a
structural and catalytic component of over 300 enzymes and transcription factors.
Interestingly, the E3 ubiquitin ligase Trim63 is a member of the zinc-finger family
of proteins that has been shown to physically bind to MyHC to induce its
proteolysis[43]. In our
study, Trim63 mRNA levels increased in cachectic muscles in metastatic models and in
Zip14-expressing myotubes when exposed to excess zinc.
Interestingly, it has been reported that increased activity of E3 ubiquitin ligases
during catabolic conditions triggers their auto-ubiquitination and subsequent
degradation and that transcriptional induction of these ligases during atrophy could
replenish their levels during enhanced protein breakdown[11].The upregulation of Zip14 in muscle satellite cells in
response to tumor factors has therapeutic implications. Normal muscle responds to
injury by stimulating the activation and proliferation of satellite cells, which
ultimately fuse to regenerate new muscle[37,58]. Muscle atrophy
in response to tumor burden also triggers membrane damage and activation of the
muscle satellite cells[34,36], however subsequent regeneration of muscle
is thought to be impaired[59]. This
aberrant response to muscle injury differs from muscular dystrophies where muscle
necrosis overtakes regenerative capacity and results in non-functional fatty and
fibrous tissue[60]. Whether impaired
regeneration represents an indirect consequence or a contributing factor to
cancer-induced cachexia remains to be further investigated. However, it is likely
that if muscle regeneration can be restored in atrophic muscles with simultaneous
inhibition of muscle degradation, the cachexia phenotype could be significantly
ameliorated in cancer. Since ZIP14 and zinc influx in satellite cells repress muscle
differentiation through the downregulation of MyoD and
Mef2c, inactivation of ZIP14 may also represent a means to
restore normal muscle regeneration in metastatic cancer.Zinc is indispensable for cellular functions and is tightly regulated at
both systemic and cellular levels[15]. Indeed, we observed normal growth and body weight gain in
healthy mice treated with zinc- supplemented water while tumor-bearing mice showed
accelerated body weight loss and muscle wasting in a
Zip14-dependent manner. Our present findings in animal models
therefore suggest that the practice of administering supplemental zinc to cancerpatients with low serum zinc levels needs cautious reconsideration. Close monitoring
of zinc levels and consumption in patients, and the development of strategies to
block ZIP14, could potentially prevent or reverse cachexia development. Our study
highlights the possibility of effectively addressing this often overlooked but
debilitating side-effect of advanced cancer to improve both the survival and quality
of life of metastatic cancerpatients.
ONLINE METHODS
Cell culture
KP1[61], C26 (parental),
4T1, PC9-BrM3 cells were kindly provided by Julien Sage (Stanford University),
NCI-Frederick DCI Tumor depository, Yibin Kang (Princeton University) and Joan
Massague (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), respectively. C26m2 cells
were derived from C26 parental cells by in vivo
selection[18]. Human
primary skeletal myoblasts were purchased from Lonza. C2C12 and 293T were
purchased from ATCC. C26 and its derivative, C26m2, 4T1, and PC9-BrM3 cells were
cultured in RPMI (Life Technologies) containing 10% FBS
(Sigma)[26,62,63]. KP1 cells[61] were cultured in RPMI containing iron supplemented
10% bovine growth serum (Hyclone). 293T and C2C12 cells were cultured in
DMEM (Life Technologies) containing 10% FBS. Mouse primary myoblasts
were cultured in Hams F-10 (Life Technologies) containing 20% FBS and
2.5 ng/ml of bFGF. All the media were supplemented with 1x Pen/Strep (100 IU/ml
of Penicillin and 100 μg/ml of Streptomycin from Life Technologies).
Human primary skeletal myoblasts were cultured in SKGM-2 Bullet kit media
(Lonza) following manufacturer’s instructions.
Adenoviral Infection
C2C12 cells or mouse primary myoblasts were cultured overnight with
180,000 cells/well in 6-well plate or 35mm dish. C2C12 cells were infected with
adenovirus expressing either GFP control (Adeno-Con) or mouseZip14 (Adeno-Zip14) (Vector Biolabs) at
250 MOI using serum-free DMEM containing 8 μg/ml of polybrene (Sigma)
for 4 hours. Primary myoblasts were infected with (Adeno-Con) or
Adeno-Zip14 at 50 MOI for 2 hours in serum-free
Ham’s F10 containing 8 μg/ml of polybrene, which was repeated
twice in 24 hours. The infected cells were then cultured in growth medium.
Muscle differentiation assays
Differentiation was initiated after adenoviral infection by switching
the growth medium to differentiation medium (DMEM containing 2% horse
serum and 5 μg/ml of insulin for C2C12 cells; DMEM containing 2%
horse serum without insulin for primary myoblasts) the day after infection.
Differentiation medium was changed every day for the indicated time-points in
the figures.
Zinc and MG132 treatment of muscle cells
3-day differentiated C2C12 cells were cultured with 50μM
ZnCl2 in differentiation medium for 24 hours. Cells were then
used for immunofluorescence staining, gene expression analysis and immunoblot
analysis. For MG132 treatment following Polge et al, 2011[64], 3-day differentiated C2C12 cells
expressing Zip14 (Adeno-Zip14) were treated
with 50μM ZnCl2 for 24 hours, and then treated with either
vehicle (DMSO) or MG132 (50μM) for 3 hours prior to harvest for
immunoblot analysis.
Cell viability assay
Viability of C2C12 cells was determined by MTS assay using Promega
CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit
containing tetrazolium compound following manufacturer’s instructions.
Briefly, 10,000 C2C12 cells infected with Adeno-GFP control (Adeno-Con) or
Adeno-Zip14 were plated in 100 μl of growth media
per well in 96-well plates and differentiated as indicated in the figures. Cells
were treated with 50 μM of ZnCl2 for 24h. Cell viability was
measured by adding 100 μl of growth medium without phenol red to each
well after aspirating media from the wells. 20 μl of CellTiter 96
AQueous One Solution Reagent was added to each well. After 1 hour of incubation
at 37°C in CO2 incubator, the amount of soluble formazan was
determined by absorbance at 450 nm. Undifferentiated and differentiated C2C12
cells were collected for immunoblot analysis probing for cleaved-caspase-3
expression to assess cell-death. C2C12 cells treated with the indicated doses of
doxorubicin (doxo) (purchased from Sigma) served as positive control for both
types of viability assays.
Treatment with cytokines and signaling pathway inhibitors
Murine C2C12 myoblasts and human primary skeletal myoblasts were
serum-starved overnight, and then treated with or without inhibitors of the
TGF-β/Smad, NF-ĸB and c-Jun/AP1 pathways, which are SB431542
(Thermo Fisher), CC401 (ThermoFisher) and BAY 11-7085 (Enzo), respectively,
followed by treatment with recombinant cytokines purchased from R&D
Systems (recombinant mouse TNF-α and TGF-β1 at 50 ng/ml and 10
ng/ml, respectively, for C2C12, recombinant human TNF-α and
TGF-β1 at 50 ng/ml and 10 ng/ml, respectively, for human primary
skeletal myoblasts). In brief, cells were pretreated with either vehicle (DMSO)
control, or 10 μM of the respective pathway inhibitors for 1 hour, and
then treated with TGF-β1 for 9 hours or TNF-α for 3 hours before
harvest. Cells with different treatments were harvested together for subsequent
analysis.
Zinc Uptake Assay
Control or Zip14-expressing C2C12 cells were cultured
in 96-well plate and were washed twice with serum-free and phenol red-free DMEM.
Cells were then incubated with 30 μl of the same DMEM containing 0.5
μM of ZnCl2 in 5% CO2 cell culture
incubator at 37°C. ZnCl2 levels remaining in the culture
medium at 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours were determined with FluoZin-3 (Thermo Fisher), a
zinc-specific fluorescent chelator[65]. Specifically, 10 μl of medium was taken out from
the plate at the designated time points and mixed with 90 μl of
FluoZin-3 in PBS to give final FluoZin-3 of 3 μM. The mixture was
incubated for 5 mins at room temperature in the dark, and fluorescence was
detected by a plate reader (Promega) at Ex494nm/Em516nm. The linear standard
curve of fluorescence signal was determined by ZnCl2 with known
concentrations between 0 to 10 μM.
Generation and validation of antibodies against human and mouse ZIP14
Codon optimized synthetic cDNA fragment (IDT g-Block) encoding soluble
cytoplasmic domain of human (amino acids 246-352) and mouse (amino acids
243-349) ZIP14 were cloned into the pET28b+ vector. Constructs were
verified by DNA sequencing and transformed into Rosetta 2(DE3) pLysS cells
(Novagen). Protein expression was induced with 1 mM of IPTG and purified by FPLC
with HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The purity of the proteins
was tested on 15% SDS-PAGE, indicating that purified ZIP14 domains from
mouse and human were greater than 90% pure. Polyclonal antibodies
against both purified human and mouseZIP14 domains were produced in New Zealand
White rabbits at Pacific Immunology Corp. To validate antibodies, western blot
was performed on crude bacterial lysates (uninduced and induced) using these
immunized sera. Immunized sera against human or mouseZIP14 only detected ZIP14
domains in the induced crude lysates, confirming antibody specificity. As
expected from the significantly high amino acid sequence identity between human
and mouseZIP14 domains, each of these immune sera detected both human and mouseZIP14 domains by western blot. For immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry,
we purified IgG fraction from the immunized sera and pre-immunized sera from
these rabbits by affinity chromatography using HiTrap Protein G column in FPLC
system. The specificity of the purified IgGs were validated by
immunohistochemical analyses using liver sections from humanpatients,
Zip14 KO mice (negative control) and from
Zip14 WT mice (positive control).
Immunohistochemical staining
Paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at 5 μm thickness.
Slides were baked at 60°C for 1 hour and de-paraffinized, rehydrated,
and treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide for 10 mins (except for
TGF-β staining, which was treated with 0.6% hydrogen peroxide in
methanol for 1 hour [66]).
Antigen retrieval was performed in citrate buffer, pH 6.0 (Vector laboratories)
in a steamer with the exception of TGF-β immunostaining, in which 1
mg/ml of hyaluronidase (Sigma) in 0.1 M of sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.5, was
used for 30 mins digestion at 37°C. Endogenous avidin/biotin were
blocked, and for TGF-β, endogenous mouse IgG was also blocked. After the
slides were further blocked with 3% BSA in PBS containing 10%
goat serum, tissue sections were incubated with primary antibody including
rabbit polyclonal antibodies against ZIP14 (1:250 of 06-1022 from Millipore, and
1:1000 of HPA016508 from Sigma), rabbit polyclonal antibodies against humanZIP14 (1:500) or mouseZIP14 (1:2500) developed in our laboratory, rabbit
polyclonal antibody against TNF-α (1:100 of 210-401-321 from Rockland),
and mouse monoclonal antibody against TGF-β (15 μg/ml of clone
1D11.16.8 from BioXCell), followed by corresponding biotinylated secondary
antibodies. ABC kit and DAB kit (Vector laboratories) were used for detection
following manufacturer’s instructions. Sections were subsequently
counterstained with Hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted using Cryoseal XYL
(Richard-Allan Scientific) for subsequent histological analysis.
Mouse studies
Treatment of mice was in accordance with the institutional guidelines of
Columbia University Institute of Comparative Medicine and approved by The
Columbia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). All
animal experiments were conducted in compliance with relevant ethical
regulations. Mice were housed in the animal facility at Columbia University
Medical Center (CUMC) under conventional conditions with constant temperature
and humidity and fed a standard diet (Labdiet 5053). Balb/c and C57Bl/6 mice
were obtained from Jackson Laboratories. Athymic nude, DBA/2 and 129P2/Ola mice
were obtained from Envigo. Zip14 knockout (KO) mice generated
by Hojyo and Fukada laboratory[32] and were obtained on a congenic Balb/c background from the
Knutson Laboratory[67]
(University of Florida). Balb/c mice were used for 4T1 murinebreast cancer cell
line implantation; C57Bl/6 were crossed with 129P2/Ola to generate 129P2/Ola
– C57Bl/6 mice for KP1 cell line implantation; Balb/c were crossed with
DBA/2 to generate CD2F1 mice for C26 and C26m2 implantation.
Zip14mice in Balb/c background were crossed with DBA/2 to
generate Zip14 knockout mice in CD2F1 background.K-rasLSL-G12D/+,
p53,
Pten and
Lkb1mice were obtained from the NCI Mouse
Repository. K-rasLSL- G12D/+ were crossed
with p53 to generate
K-rasLSL-G12D/+-p53mice, K-rasLSL-G12D/+ were crossed with
Lkb1 to generate
K-rasLSL-G12D/+-Lkb1
and Pten were crossed with
Lkb1 to generate
Ptenmice.
Genotyping for all the strains were performed using primers listed in Supplementary table 6.
Mice were weighed weekly. Food and water intake was measured by weighing food
and measuring water in a graduated cylinder weekly. Mouse body condition as a
measure of cachexia was assessed using a body condition scoring system as
previously reported[68].
Adenoviral delivery of Cre-recombinase for tumorigenesis in genetic models of
lung cancer
About 2-3 month-old
K-rasLSL-G12D/+-p53,
K-rasLSL-G12D/+-Lkb1
and Ptenmice were
anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) for adenoviral
infection. 2.5 × 107 PFU Ad5CMVCre was added to MEM media
with 0.5% CaCl2 for a total volume of 125 μl. The
viruses were inhaled slowly by adding 62.5 μl at a time in the same
nostril, and by waiting at least 10 mins before adding the second 62.5
μl following procedures outlined previously[69].
Metastasis assays in mice
Both male and female mice were used in this study. Athymic mice aged 8-9
weeks were injected with 1×105 PC9-BrM3 cells by intracardiac
route into arterial circulation for experimental metastasis assays. For tumor
studies, mice aged between 5-6 weeks for C26m2, 8-9 weeks for 4T1 and 4-5 weeks
for KP1 injections were used. For each model, 1×106 tumor
cells were subcutaneously injected in the right flank of syngeneic mice as
previously described. Subcutaneous tumor was removed between 2-3 weeks to allow
for metastasis formation following the tumor-resection-relapse
approach[19]. In brief,
for tumor resection, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (3-4%)
administered with a precision vaporizer, and any large veins were cauterized.
Buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) was given subcutaneously every 6-12 hours for 48
hours for pain relief after surgery. Zip14 WT or
Zip14 KO mice in CD2F1 or Balb/c background at 4-5 weeks of
age were subcutaneously injected with 1×106 C26m2 or 4T1
tumor cells, respectively. Tumors were not resected with survival-surgeries in
the Zip14 WT and KO mice due to the phenotypic and behavioral
abnormalities in the Zip14 KO mice. Spontaneous metastasis was
monitored by bioluminescent imaging in the Zip14 WT and
Zip14 KO groups at endpoint (5 weeks post-tumor cell
injection with C26m2 and 4T1 injections, respectively) and confirmed by
histology upon harvest.
Neutralization assay of TNF-α and TGF-β in mice
Athymic nude mice and Balb/c mice of 8-9 weeks of age were
subcutaneously injected[44] with
C26m2 and 4T1 cells, respectively. Mice were randomized for treatment group
assignments. Tumors were surgically removed 2-3 weeks after tumor cell
injection. One week after tumor removal, InVivoPlus
anti-TGF-β (BP0057, Clone: 1D11.16.8), InVivoPlus
anti-TNF-α (BP0058, Clone: XT3.11) or InVivoPlus MouseIgG1 Isotype control (BP0083, Clone: MOPC-21) from BioXCell were
intraperitoneally injected into mice with a dose of 200 μg/mouse three
times a week for one week.
Tissue collection
After euthanasia, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, quadriceps, soleus,
EDL, heart and diaphragm muscles, livers and lungs were collected for histology
or snap frozen for molecular analysis. Metastatic tumors were collected in
formalin for histological analysis and a part of the C26 metastases was used for
derivation of cell lines for C26m2. For cell derivation, tumors were dissociated
in 3 mg/ml of Collagenase I (Worthington Biochemical Corp.) and 2 U/ml of
Dispase II (Roche) for 1 hour at 37°C with gentle rocking and then
filtered through a 70μm mesh. Cells were briefly centrifuged,
resuspended in culture medium and grown to confluence.
Generation of stable cell lines expressing luciferase
All cancer cell lines used in this study were stably infected with
lentivirus expressing luciferase enzyme and hygromycin resistance marker.
Briefly, cells were plated at 30% confluency (adherent cells) or at a
density of 1×105/ml (suspension cells). Lentivirus was
produced using pLVX-Hygro vector expressing luciferase gene (a kind gift from
Zvika Granot, Hebrew University of Jerusalem). Target cells were transduced with
the viral supernatant for 3 hours. After 48 hours post-infection, stable cells
integrated with the vector were selected by 100 μg/ml of hygromycin B
(Invitrogen) for a week.
Bioluminescence and fluorescence by in-vivo Imaging
Tumor growth was measured by digital calipers and spontaneous metastasis
was monitored by bioluminescent imaging using IVIS (Perkin Elmer). Briefly, mice
were anesthetized with (3-4%) isoflurane and injected with 150 ng of
D-Luciferin (Fisher Scientific) via intraperitoneal injections. Also, pigmented
mice were shaved before imaging. The mice were then placed inside the
PerkinElmer IVIS Spectrum Optical Imaging System, and scanned for one minute to
measure bioluminescence or fluorescence for mCherry imaging.
Zinc-supplemented water treatment for mice
ZnSO4 solution was purchased from Sigma.
WT and KO mice were given either
regular water or zinc-supplemented drinking water (25 mM ZnSO4 in
drinking water as described[70]). Zinc water was started from the day of tumor injection in the
tumor-bearing group and in matched uninjected controls, which continued until
the animals were euthanized at 15 days. Tumors were not resected because
cachectic symptoms started to develop early and were visible between 8-10 days
in the tumor-bearing Zip14 WT group of mice on zinc-enriched
water.
Behavioral Coordination tests in mice
Rotamex-5 (Columbus Instruments) with a rod diameter of 3cm, was used
for testing coordination in mice. In this setup, automatic fall detection is
implemented within each lane by a series of photocells placed above the rotating
rod. The speed of the rotating rod is programmed for either constant or
accelerated modes. Rod speed can be specified in either terms of rotations (RPM)
or in linear terms (cm per second). Latency to fall is detected with 0.1 second
temporal resolution. Rate of rotation at time of fall is resolved to 0.1 RPM or
0.1cm/second. Both latency and rod speed at time of fall are presented on a
display for each of the four lanes. In brief, following manufacturer’s
instructions, for each mouse, an average of 3 runs are recorded, with 5 minutes
rest between each run. The speed the rod is spinning at when the mouse falls is
measured in RPMs. The time it takes for the mouse to fall is measured in
seconds. Mice are placed on the rod for 1 minute while the rod spins at 1 RPM so
the mouse gets habituated to the rod spinning. When the experiment begins, the
rod accelerates at 1 rpm every 10 seconds until the mouse falls off. When the
mice fall off, the latency to fall (seconds) is measured.
Virus production, purification and titration
For adeno-associated virus production, we constructed two different AAV
vectors, including AAV-CAG-Zip14-IRES-GFP and AAV-CAG-mCherry.
pAAV-Ef1a-mCherry- IRES-Cre (Addgene plasmid #55632) was a gift from
Karl Deisseroth, and was used as PCR template for cloning mCherry and IRES.
AAV-CAG-ChR2-GFP (Addgene plasmid #26929) was a gift from Edward Boyden,
and was used as template for cloning GFP. AAV-CAG-ChR2-GFP was also used as
backbone AAV vector with CAG promoter after digesting by BamHI (Roche) and BsrGI
(Thermo Fisher). By sequential PCR amplification, mCherry alone, Zip14-IRES-GFP
amplicons, containing N-terminal BamHI and C-terminal BsrGI digestion sites,
were introduced into digested AAV-CAG backbone to get the AAV vectors. The AAV
constructs were confirmed by sequencing, and then co-transfected with pDeltaF6
and AAV 2/9 Helper plasmids, in a ratio of 1:2:1.6, into 293T cells by calcium
phosphate. 48 hours later, 293T cells containing AAV were collected for virus
purification.Viruses were purified following the protocol as described
before[71]. Briefly,
AAV9-producing 293T cells were detached by adding 1/80 volume of 0.5 M EDTA (pH
8.0) for 10 mins incubation at room temperature and collected by centrifugation
at 2,000×g for 10 mins at 4°C. Cell pellets were lysed by adding
24 ml of 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS containing 5μg/ml of RNase A
(Sigma) and shaking for 1 h at 37°C. Cell lysates were centrifuged at
10,000×g for 10 mins at 4°C, and 24 ml of supernatant was added
into an ultracentrifuge tube. The virus solution was raised up by successive
addition of 3 ml of 25% iodixanol, 4 ml of 40% iodixanol and 2
ml of 60% iodixanol to the bottom of the tube. All the iodixanol
solutions were prepared in PBS containing 1M NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM
KCl. The tube was centrifuged at 350,000×g for 1.5 hours at
18°C. 4.5 ml of virus solution at the bottom of tube was collected using
18G needle and filtered through 0.45 μm filter. Virus solution was then
concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 (100K) (Millipore) and washed 3 times with
250 mM NaCl solution. Virus titration was performed with primers targeting at
CAG (forward 5’- TTA CGG TAA ACT GCC CAC TTG-3’, reverse
5’- CAT AAG GTC ATG TAC TGG GCA TAA-3’) with AAV-CAG-mCherry
plasmid as standard.
AAV9 Injection
AAV9-mCherry-U6-mSLC39A14-shRNA or
AAV9-mCherry-U6-scrmb-shRNA, both from Vector Biolabs, were
used for knockdown of Zip14 expression or as negative control,
respectively, by injecting directly into mouse gastrocnemius muscles. The
validated shRNA sequence for knockdown of Zip14 is
CCGG-
GCAGGCTCTCTTCTTCAACTTCTCGCGAAGTTGAAGAAGAAGAGAGCCTGC-TTTTTG (Vector
Biolabs). Zip14 knockdown efficiency was about 90% in
Hepa1.6 cells (Vector Biolabs). For knockdown of Zip14 in mouse
skeletal muscle, 3×1011 genome copies of AAV9 virus were
directly injected into the right gastrocnemius muscle using five injection sites
in 7-8 weeks old athymic mice. mCherry expression was monitored weekly by
fluorescence imaging, and after confirmation, tumor growth and metastasis assays
were performed. Athymic mice were used to avoid additional immune reaction. For
overexpression of Zip14, 2.2×1010 genome
copies of AAV9 virus purified above were injected into the gastrocnemius muscle
using five injection sites in 5-6 weeks aged Zip14 KO Balb/c
mice.
Functional assays of grip strength
Grip strength was measured from mice injected with 4T1 or C26m2 cells or
age-matched non-tumor bearing controls using a Digital Grip Strength Meter
(Columbus Instruments). A minimum of five measurements was taken from each mouse
for hind limb measurements. Grip strength was calculated as the average of the
five measurements divided by body weight for each group.
Measurement of zinc metal ion in mouse muscles
Muscles were analyzed at the Diagnostic Center for Population &
Animal Health at Michigan State University. Briefly, tissues were dried
overnight in a 75°C oven and then digested overnight in approximately
10× the dry tissue mass of nitric acid. The digested samples were
diluted with water to 100× the dried tissue mass. Elemental analysis was
performed using an Agilent Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer
(ICP/MS). Elemental concentrations were calibrated using a 4-point linear curve
of the analyte-internal standard response ratio. Standards were from Inorganic
Ventures.
Single myofiber isolation and LA-ICP-MS
Single myofiber isolation from EDL muscles was performed following the
protocol described before[72].
Briefly, EDL muscles were dissected and transferred into a pre-warmed horse
serum coated Petri dish containing 1.8 ml of DMEM supplemented with 10%
FBS, 1× pen/strep antibiotics and 0.11 mg/ml of sodium pyruvate. Then
0.2 ml of 2% collagenase (about 40,000 U/ml) solution was added and
muscles were digested at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator
for 40 to 60 mins, during which a large bore glass pipette for flushing the
muscle would help to loosen up the muscle and release single fibers into medium.
The released muscle myofibers were transferred into a pre-warmed horse serum
coated Petri dish with 4 ml of DMEM containing 10% FBS and 0.11 mg
sodium pyruvate to avoid over-digestion. The myofibers were then transferred
into pre-warmed, horse-serum coated Petri dish containing wash media (DMEM
supplemented with 1× pen/strep and 0.11 mg/ml of sodium pyruvate), and
washed for three times to remove dead myofibers and debris. Single myofibers
were transferred onto glass slide and air-dried. For subsequent LA-ICP-MS
analysis, single muscle fiber mounted on slide were placed in sealed ablation
cell and ablated with a new wave UP213 Nd:YAG laser beam at 0.25-0.35 mJ with a
100 μm spot size. Ablation was set at 5μm/sec and 20 Hz. The
ablated sample particles were then transferred to a Thermo iCapQ ICP-MS that was
optimized using a NIST 612 glass standard prior to every sample run. The
isotopes selected for analysis were 64Zn, 66Zn and
31P. Individual muscle fiber data was subtracted from a blank
line on the same slide with same dimension, size and parameters as the sample
line.
Liver and Kidney function analysis
Liver and kidney function tests were performed using automated clinical
chemistry analyzer (VetAce ® Clinical Chemistry System; Alfa Wasserman
Diagnostic LLC West Caldwell, New Jersey) for AST (Aspartate aminotransferase),
BUN (Blood ureanitrogen) and Creatinine in serum following
manufacturer’s instructions. Specifically, 20 μl, 3 μl
and 20 μl of serum from mice bearing C26m2 metastases with or without
zinc supplemented water treatment were used for assays of AST, BUN and
Creatinine, respectively.
Muscle diameter analysis
Images of muscle sections stained with H&E or laminin were taken
at 20× magnification. Fiber diameters were quantified as described
before[62] from a
minimum of 500 fibers per five randomly chosen fields for each mouse using
ImageJ software, at a minimum of 3 mice per group. For morphometric analysis,
percentage of fiber number in each pre-defined group was categorized by fiber
diameter from mice bearing 4T1 or C26m2 metastases and their respective
controls.
Magnetic Sorting of Muscle Satellite Cells
CD45−CD31−Sca1−Integrin-α7+
skeletal muscle satellite cells were isolated according to the methods described
in [34,73]. Briefly, all limb skeletal muscles from
1-2 week old mice were combined and minced into a smooth pulp. The muscles were
then digested with collagenase (2-5 ml of 0.2% collagenase type 2, based
upon muscle mass, in DMEM with 10% FBS) at 37°C for 40 mins. The
dissociated single cells were filtered through 70-micron strainer and pelleted
by centrifugation at 400×g for 5 mins at 4°C. Cells
were washed twice with DMEM containing 2% FBS and suspended in 200-500
μl of DMEM with 2% FBS. Fc blocker (1:100, BD Pharmingen,
553142) was added to the cell suspension and incubated on ice for 10 mins. The
following antibodies were then added into the cell suspension: CD31-PE (1:100,
eBioscience, 12-0311-81), CD45-PE (1:100, eBioscience, 12-0451-83), Sca1-PE
(1:100, eBioscience, 12- 5981-81), integrin-α7 antibody (1:10, Miltenyi
Biotec, 130-103-774), and gently rocked at 4°C for 15 mins. Cell pellet
was washed twice with DMEM containing 2% FBS, and resuspended in DMEM
with 2% FBS. 40-100 μl of anti-PE magnetic beads (Miltenyi
Biotec, 130-105-639) was added into the cell suspension and gently rocked at
4°C for 15 mins. Cell pellet was washed twice with MACS buffer (PBS with
0.5% BSA and 2 mM EDTA), resuspended with 0.5 ml of MACS buffer, and
applied onto a LD column that was set up on a magnetic board (Miltenyi Biotech).
The flow-through cells were collected according to the manufacturer’s
protocol, and pelleted by centrifugation. The cells were then resuspended with
80-200 μl of DMEM with 2% FBS, and 20-50 μl of
anti-mouse IgG magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-048-402) was added into the
cell suspension and gently rocked at 4°C for 15 mins, and the cell
pellet was washed twice with MACS buffer. Cells were then resuspended with 0.5
ml of MACS buffer, and applied onto an LS column. After washing with MACS
buffer, the cells retained in the LS column were collected according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. Isolated muscle satellite cells were cultured
in collagen-coated dishes with myoblast growth medium as described[73].
Isolation of muscle progenitor cells by flow cytometry
Mouse gastrocnemius muscles were collected and processed for depletion
of CD45+ and CD31+ cells by anti-PE
magnetic beads using LD column (Miltenyi Biotech) as described under Magnetic
Sorting of Muscle Satellite Cells. Cells in the flow-through fraction were
pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended with 100 μl of DMEM
containing 2% FBS. The following antibodies were then added into the
cell suspension: CD34-FITC (1:50, Miltenyi Biotec, 130-105-831), Sca1-PE
(1:100), and integrin-α7-APC (1:100, Miltenyi Biotec, 130-103-356),
mixed and gently rocked at 4°C for 45 mins in the dark, and then washed
twice with FACS buffer (0.5% BSA in PBS). The cells were resuspended in
FACS buffer and used for flow cytometric analysis for isolation of
CD34+Sca1+ and
CD34+integrin-α7+ cells.
RNA extraction for RNA sequencing and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol® reagent (Thermo Fisher) as
previously described[74]. RNA
was further purified using RNeasy Mini kit including a DNase digest following
the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen). RNA was quantified using
Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific) and RNA-quality was assessed by capillary gel
electrophoresis (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer; Agilent Technologies, Inc.).
Single-end cDNA libraries were prepared for each sample and sequenced using the
Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit by following the
manufacturer’s procedures and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000.
Library construction and RNA sequencing were performed in the Columbia Genome
Center at CUMC.For qRT-RCR analysis, 100-500 ng of total RNA was used for cDNA
synthesis using transcriptor first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche) following
the manufacturer’s instructions. 10 ng of cDNA was used for qRT-RCR
reactions using SYBR Green or TaqMan PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) with
gene-specific primers. qRT-PCR was run on Applied Biosystems 7500 fast real-time
PCR system and analyzed by Applied Biosystems software. GAPDH
or B2M was used as internal control when qRT-PCR was performed
using SYBR Green or TaqMan PCR master mix, respectively; except for
18s was used as internal control in gene expression
analysis of isolated muscle progenitor cells. The normalized fold change of gene
expression level was analyzed using 2−∆∆Ct
method[75]. SYBR Green
real-time PCR primer sequences are listed in Supplementary table 7.
TaqMan real-time PCR primers are: B2M (Hs99999907_m1) and
CXCL1 (Hs00236937_m1) from Applied Biosystems.
Human Samples
Human tissues were obtained upon autopsy at New York
Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center or from Rapid Autopsy Pancreas
Program at the University of Nebraska with approved IRB protocols from both
institutions. All research was conducted in compliance with ethical regulations.
In particular, human psoas muscles fixed in 10% buffered formalin were
collected from metastatic cancerpatients at New York Presbyterian/Columbia
University Medical Center upon autopsy, or from the Rapid Autopsy Pancreas
Program at the University of Nebraska. To ensure minimal degradation of tissues,
muscles collected at the Rapid Autopsy Program were harvested within two-three
hours post mortem and the specimens were fixed in formalin immediately after
collection. Presence of cancer and cachexia were based on autopsy report and
additionally confirmed by histological analysis by two, independent pathologists
at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and Columbia University Medical
Center. Description of cancer type and presence of cachexia are listed in Supplementary Table
3.
Subcellular fractionation of differentiated C2C12 muscle cells
Fractionation of soluble and myofibrillar components was performed
following the protocol described before[76]. In brief, differentiated C2C12 muscle cells were
collected in cold lysis buffer (20 mM of Tris-HCl pH 7.2, 5 mM of EGTA, 100mM of
KCl, 1%Triton X-100, and 1× protease and phosphatase inhibitor
cocktail), and lysed by gentle agitation at 4°C for 1h. After
centrifugation at 3,000×g for 30 mins at 4°C, the cytosolic
fraction (supernatant) was collected and stored in -80°C. The pellet
(myofibrils) was washed twice with wash buffer (20mM of Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 100mM
of KCl, and 1mM of DTT). After centrifugation at 3,000×g for 10 mins at
4°C, myofibrillar fraction was extracted in ice- cold extraction buffer
(0.6 M of KCl, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM of EDTA, 1 mM of DTT and 1×
protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail) with shaking at 4°C. The
purified myofibrillar fraction was collected after centrifugation for
3,000×g at 4°C and stored in -80°C until further
use.
Immunofluorescence staining and immunoblotting
For immunofluorescence staining of cultured cells, cells were fixed with
2% formaldehyde for 30 mins, permeabilized with 0.5% NP-40 for 5
mins, and blocked with 10% goat serum in PBS containing 3% BSA
for 30 mins. Cells were then incubated for 1 hour with primary antibody: rabbit
polyclonal antibodies against mouseZIP14 (1:500 developed in our laboratory),
Desmin (1:500 Sigma, D8281), mouse monoclonal antibodies against fast MyHC
(1:500 Sigma, clone MY-32) or tropomyosin (1:500 DSHB, CH1) followed by 30 mins
incubation with Alexa Fluor 568-labeled secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher).
Slides were then mounted using Fluoro-gel II with DAPI (Electron Microscopy
Sciences). For immunofluorescence staining of mouse muscle tissues with ZIP14,
cryosections of 5 μm thickness were air dried for 1 hour and fixed with
2% PFA in PBS for 10 mins at room temperature, and then washed twice
with PBS containing 0.2% Tween-20. PFA neutralization was performed
using 1% glycine in PBS for 15 mins, and sections were permeabilized for
15 mins using 1% Triton X-100 in PBS. The sections were treated with
1% H2O2 for 10 mins and sequentially blocked by
Avidin/Biotin blocking kit and 3% BSA in PBS containing 10% goat
serum, followed by 30 mins incubation of rabbit polyclonal antibody against
mouseZIP14 (1:1000) developed in our laboratory. Sections were then incubated
with a biotinylated secondary antibody, and followed by 30 mins incubation with
HRP-conjugated streptavidin (PerkinElmer). Signal amplification was performed
using biotin-tyramide kit (TSA Biotin System, PerkinElmer) following
manufacturer’s instructions. The sections were subsequently incubated
with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson Laboratories) for 30 mins,
and then mounted using Fluoro-gel II with DAPI. For immunofluorescence staining
of tissues with Laminin and CD31, the cryosections were air dried for
approximately 10 mins and fixed with cold acetone for 10 mins, and then washed
with PBS. Sections were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS containing
10% goat serum for 1 hour at room temperature, and then incubated with
rabbit polyclonal antibody against Laminin (1:200) (Sigma, L9393) and/or rat
monoclonal antibody against CD31 (BD, 557355) for 30 mins at room temperature.
After washing with PBS, the sections were then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488
and/or 568 secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher) for 30 mins at room temperature
and mounted with Fluoro-gel II with DAPI. For immunofluorescence staining of
myosin isoforms in muscle, cryosections were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS
containing 10% goat serum, followed by 30 mins incubation with primary
monoclonal antibodies (1:1 of myosin heavy chain IIa (DSHB, SC-71) and myosin
heavy chain IIb (DSHB, BF-F3), which are mouseIgG1 and IgM isotypes,
respectively. After another 30 mins incubation with a mixture of secondary
antibodies (1:500 of each goat anti-mouseIgG1Alexa 488 and goat anti-mouse IgM
Alexa 546, all from Thermo Fisher), the sections were washed and mounted using
Fluoro-gel II with DAPI. For immunofluorescence staining of PAX7 and ZIP14 on
muscle tissues from cancerpatients, paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at
5 μm thickness, and the slides were de-paraffinized and rehydrated as
described above. The muscle sections were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS
containing 10% goat serum for 30 mins at room temperature, and then
incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibody against humanZIP14 (1:500, developed
in our laboratory) and mouse monoclonal antibody against PAX7 (1;200, IgG1 from
DSHB) for 30 mins at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the sections were
then incubated with goat anti-rabbitAlexa Fluor 568 and goat anti-mouseIgG1Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher) for 30 mins at room
temperature and mounted with Fluoro-gel II with DAPI.For immunoblot analysis, cells or muscle tissues were lysed or
homogenized in the indicated lysis buffers as described before[44,76,77]. High salt
lysis buffer was used for greater solubility of myofibrillar proteins such as
myosin[41,77], which is composed of 300 mM
of NaCl, 0.1 M of NaH22PO4, 0.05 M of
Na2HPO4, 0.01 M of Na4P2O7, 1 mM
of MgCl2, 10 mM of EDTA, 1 mM of DTT (pH 6.5), and low salt lysis
buffer composed of 50 mM of Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM of NaCl, 0.5% of
TritonX-100, 1 mM of EDTA was used for immunoblot analysis of other
non-myofibrillar proteins. Both the high and low salt lysis buffers were
supplemented with protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo
Scientific). Protein concentration was determined by Pierce BCA protein assay
kit (Thermo scientific), and proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred
onto Polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. After blocking with 5% w/v
non-fat milk in TBS-T (20 mM of Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 500 mM of NaCl and 0.1%
of Tween 20) for 1 hour at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with
the following antibodies: rabbit polyclonal antibodies against ZIP14 (1:1000)
(Millipore, 06-1022, NRG1830910), p-c-Jun (S63) (1:1000) (Cell signaling,
#9261) and Cleaved-caspase 3 (1:1000) (Cell signaling, #9661);
rabbit monoclonal antibodies against p-p65 (S536) (#3033), p65
(#8242), c-Jun (#9165), pSmad2 (S465/467) (#3108), Smad2
(#5339 purchased from Cell signaling with a dilution of 1:1000); mouse
monoclonal antibodies against fast MyHC (1:5000) (Sigma, clone MY-32), skeletal
actin (1:5000) (Sigma, A2172), tubulin (1:5000) (Sigma, T6074), troponin T
(1:1000) (DSHB, JLT12), myosin light chain (1:1000) (DSHB, F310), and
tropomyosin (1:1000) (DSHB, CH1). The membranes were then incubated with
corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies, developed using ECL substrate
(Bio-Rad) and visualized using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging
System.
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) staining of mouse muscles
Cryosections of mouse muscles were incubated with 1 mg/ml of
nitrotetrazolium blue chloride and 100mM of sodium succinate in PBS at
37°C for 30 mins. Slides were washed three times with PBS and mounted
with glycerol.
Computational analysis
From RNA sequencing data, reads were generated using RTA (Illumina) for
base calling and bcl2fastq (version 1.8.4) was used for converting BCL to fastq
format, coupled with adaptor trimming. Reads were mapped to a reference genome
(Mouse: NCBIm37) using Tophat2 (version 2.0.11) with very-fast (-D 5 -R 1 -N 0
-L 22 -i S,0,2.50) option resulting in zero 0 (N) mismatches. Reads across
junctions were checked and indicated in the supplied GFF
(–no-novel-juncs). Bam files obtained from TopHat were used to generate
the differential gene using the module Cuffdiff (Cufflinks 2.2.1) with default
settings, sorted based on the FDR or q-val. The cutoff for the differential gene
list was set as q-val less than 0.05. The expression values obtained using
Cuffdiff were checked for data quality using the PCA module of R package
CummeRbund 2.20.0. From the differential gene lists of RNA seq of muscles from
C26m2 and 4T1 models, a new list was created with common genes from both the
models. To prevent spurious results from infinity values, genes with low
expression on one condition and/or zero expression on another were excluded from
the initial analysis using C26m2 as the base model. Gene Set enrichment Analysis
(GSEA) using the GSEAPreranked tool for RNA sequencing data was used for
conducting the analysis, where fold change values was used as our criteria for
ranking. Pre-ranked GSEA was performed on standalone GSEA (v2.2.2) using the
C2_CP_KEGG gene-set, the HALLMARK_MYOGENESIS gene-sets[78,79]. Functional annotation clustering of the common genes was
performed using DAVID (Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated
Discovery) from https://david.ncifcrf.gov.
Upregulated genes (log2 fold change greater than 1 with p and q- values
<0.05) or downregulated genes (log2 fold less than -1 with p and
q-values <0.05) were used for DAVID analysis. Clusters with an
enrichment score ≥5.0 and significant p-value<0.05 were
analyzed. IPA Upstream Regulator Analysis (Ingenuity, Qiagen) was performed
using the RNA sequencing experimental dataset to identify upstream regulators
and to predict whether they are activated or inhibited. IPA analysis was
performed using the 1297 common genes between C26m2 and 4T1 with fold-change
greater than 1.5 with significant p and q-value<0.05. For heat-map
representation of qRT-PCR data, heatmaps were created using the gplots library
in R for percentage value relative to control.
Statistical analysis
Statistical significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed
Student’s t-test, two sided Welch’s t test, Pearson Chi-Square
test or One-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s test using Prism 6 software
(GraphPad Software). All values are mean ± SEM and
P-value < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.Specifically, for analysis using DAVID (Database for Annotation,
Visualization and Integrated Discovery) from https://david.ncifcrf.gov,
probability values (p-values) from one-tailed Fisher ‘s exact
test were used as cutoff criteria. P-values were further corrected using
the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure. For processing of RNA sequencing data
using Cuffdiff, the p-value were obtained using Jensen-Shannon divergence
statistics. For multiple testing correction q-values are obtained using
Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach for controlling FDR. For Ingenuity
pathway analysis (IPA) analysis, p-values from Fisher’s exact test were
used and corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. For gene-set
enrichment analysis, a modified form of Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test was used
for calculating Enrichment score. The nominal p-values generated were further
corrected for FDR.
Life Sciences Reporting Summary
Further information on experimental design is available in the Life
Sciences Reporting Summary.
Data availability and Accession Code availability statements
Supplementary
information and source data files are available in the online version
of the paper or can be obtained from corresponding author upon request. The
uncropped immunoblot images used in the main figures are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6. The
RNA-sequencing data was deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with
accession number GSE112204. De-identified patient information with relevant
clinical annotation are available in the Supplementary Table, Life Sciences Reporting Summary.
Additional de-identified data with clinical annotation are available upon
reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Authors: Yibin Kang; Wei He; Shaun Tulley; Gaorav P Gupta; Inna Serganova; Chang-Rung Chen; Katia Manova-Todorova; Ronald Blasberg; William L Gerald; Joan Massagué Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Juan P Liuzzi; Louis A Lichten; Seth Rivera; Raymond K Blanchard; Tolunay Beker Aydemir; Mitchell D Knutson; Tomas Ganz; Robert J Cousins Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: W D Dewys; C Begg; P T Lavin; P R Band; J M Bennett; J R Bertino; M H Cohen; H O Douglass; P F Engstrom; E Z Ezdinli; J Horton; G J Johnson; C G Moertel; M M Oken; C Perlia; C Rosenbaum; M N Silverstein; R T Skeel; R W Sponzo; D C Tormey Journal: Am J Med Date: 1980-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Seoyoung Han; Yifan Tai; Wanchao Ma; Courtney Coker; Anup Kumar Biswas; S Aidan Quinn; Ahmad Rushdi Shakri; Timothy James Zhong; Hanna Scholze; Galina G Lagos; Angeliki Mela; Katia Manova-Todorova; Elisa de Stanchina; Adolfo A Ferrando; Cathy Mendelsohn; Peter Canoll; Helena A Yu; Paul K Paik; Anjali Saqi; Catherine A Shu; Mark G Kris; Joan Massague; Swarnali Acharyya Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Rachel L Nosacka; Andrea E Delitto; Dan Delitto; Rohan Patel; Sarah M Judge; Jose G Trevino; Andrew R Judge Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Juan Diego Hernández-Camacho; Cristina Vicente-García; Douglas S Parsons; Ignacio Navas-Enamorado Journal: Redox Biol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 11.799