Literature DB >> 27496803

Theoretical modeling of multiprotein complexes by iSPOT: Integration of small-angle X-ray scattering, hydroxyl radical footprinting, and computational docking.

Wei Huang1, Krishnakumar M Ravikumar1, Marc Parisien2, Sichun Yang3.   

Abstract

Structural determination of protein-protein complexes such as multidomain nuclear receptors has been challenging for high-resolution structural techniques. Here, we present a combined use of multiple biophysical methods, termed iSPOT, an integration of shape information from small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), protection factors probed by hydroxyl radical footprinting, and a large series of computationally docked conformations from rigid-body or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Specifically tested on two model systems, the power of iSPOT is demonstrated to accurately predict the structures of a large protein-protein complex (TGFβ-FKBP12) and a multidomain nuclear receptor homodimer (HNF-4α), based on the structures of individual components of the complexes. Although neither SAXS nor footprinting alone can yield an unambiguous picture for each complex, the combination of both, seamlessly integrated in iSPOT, narrows down the best-fit structures that are about 3.2Å and 4.2Å in RMSD from their corresponding crystal structures, respectively. Furthermore, this proof-of-principle study based on the data synthetically derived from available crystal structures shows that the iSPOT-using either rigid-body or MD-based flexible docking-is capable of overcoming the shortcomings of standalone computational methods, especially for HNF-4α. By taking advantage of the integration of SAXS-based shape information and footprinting-based protection/accessibility as well as computational docking, this iSPOT platform is set to be a powerful approach towards accurate integrated modeling of many challenging multiprotein complexes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Footprinting; Integration; Modeling; SAXS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27496803      PMCID: PMC5118146          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  53 in total

1.  X-ray structures of small ligand-FKBP complexes provide an estimate for hydrophobic interaction energies.

Authors:  P Burkhard; P Taylor; M D Walkinshaw
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-01-28       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Crystal structure of the cytoplasmic domain of the type I TGF beta receptor in complex with FKBP12.

Authors:  M Huse; Y G Chen; J Massagué; J Kuriyan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The TGF beta receptor activation process: an inhibitor- to substrate-binding switch.

Authors:  M Huse; T W Muir; L Xu; Y G Chen; J Kuriyan; J Massagué
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information.

Authors:  Cyril Dominguez; Rolf Boelens; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Analysis of protein solvent accessible surfaces by photochemical oxidation and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Joshua S Sharp; Jeffrey M Becker; Robert L Hettich
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Small-angle scattering: a view on the properties, structures and structural changes of biological macromolecules in solution.

Authors:  Michel H Koch; Patrice Vachette; Dmitri I Svergun
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  MMTSB Tool Set: enhanced sampling and multiscale modeling methods for applications in structural biology.

Authors:  Michael Feig; John Karanicolas; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.518

9.  The nuclear receptor superfamily: a personal retrospect on the first two decades.

Authors:  Pierre Chambon
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-06

10.  Relating kinetic rates and local energetic roughness by accelerated molecular-dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Donald Hamelberg; Tongye Shen; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure.

Authors:  Justin T Seffernick; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Large-scale simulations of nucleoprotein complexes: ribosomes, nucleosomes, chromatin, chromosomes and CRISPR.

Authors:  Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  A Metastable Contact and Structural Disorder in the Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Domain.

Authors:  Yi Peng; Shufen Cao; Janna Kiselar; Xiangzhu Xiao; Zhanwen Du; An Hsieh; Soobin Ko; Yinghua Chen; Prashansa Agrawal; Wenwei Zheng; Wuxian Shi; Wei Jiang; Lin Yang; Mark R Chance; Witold K Surewicz; Matthias Buck; Sichun Yang
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  Covalent labeling-mass spectrometry with non-specific reagents for studying protein structure and interactions.

Authors:  Patanachai Limpikirati; Tianying Liu; Richard W Vachet
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 5.  Implementing fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP) as a footprinting approach to solve diverse problems in structural biology.

Authors:  Bojie Zhang; Ming Cheng; Don Rempel; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 6.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Higher-Order Structure Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications.

Authors:  Xiaoran Roger Liu; Mengru Mira Zhang; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Rosetta Protein Structure Prediction from Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Melanie L Aprahamian; Emily E Chea; Lisa M Jones; Steffen Lindert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Protein Footprinting: Auxiliary Engine to Power the Structural Biology Revolution.

Authors:  Mark R Chance; Erik R Farquhar; Sichun Yang; David T Lodowski; Janna Kiselar
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Federating Structural Models and Data: Outcomes from A Workshop on Archiving Integrative Structures.

Authors:  Helen M Berman; Paul D Adams; Alexandre A Bonvin; Stephen K Burley; Bridget Carragher; Wah Chiu; Frank DiMaio; Thomas E Ferrin; Margaret J Gabanyi; Thomas D Goddard; Patrick R Griffin; Juergen Haas; Christian A Hanke; Jeffrey C Hoch; Gerhard Hummer; Genji Kurisu; Catherine L Lawson; Alexander Leitner; John L Markley; Jens Meiler; Gaetano T Montelione; George N Phillips; Thomas Prisner; Juri Rappsilber; David C Schriemer; Torsten Schwede; Claus A M Seidel; Timothy S Strutzenberg; Dmitri I Svergun; Emad Tajkhorshid; Jill Trewhella; Brinda Vallat; Sameer Velankar; Geerten W Vuister; Benjamin Webb; John D Westbrook; Kate L White; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Reporting on the future of integrative structural biology ORAU workshop.

Authors:  George L Hamilton; Joshua Alper; Hugo Sanabria
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2020-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.