Literature DB >> 29871826

Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Mary Katherine Davis2, Megan H Pridgen2.   

Abstract

Everyday speech perception is challenged by external acoustic interferences that hinder verbal communication. Here, we directly compared how different levels of the auditory system (brainstem vs. cortex) code speech and how their neural representations are affected by two acoustic stressors: noise and reverberation. We recorded multichannel (64 ch) brainstem frequency-following responses (FFRs) and cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) simultaneously in normal hearing individuals to speech sounds presented in mild and moderate levels of noise and reverb. We matched signal-to-noise and direct-to-reverberant ratios to equate the severity between classes of interference. Electrode recordings were parsed into source waveforms to assess the relative contribution of region-specific brain areas [i.e., brainstem (BS), primary auditory cortex (A1), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)]. Results showed that reverberation was less detrimental to (and in some cases facilitated) the neural encoding of speech compared to additive noise. Inter-regional correlations revealed associations between BS and A1 responses, suggesting subcortical speech representations influence higher auditory-cortical areas. Functional connectivity analyses further showed that directed signaling toward A1 in both feedforward cortico-collicular (BS→A1) and feedback cortico-cortical (IFG→A1) pathways were strong predictors of degraded speech perception and differentiated "good" vs. "poor" perceivers. Our findings demonstrate a functional interplay within the brain's speech network that depends on the form and severity of acoustic interference. We infer that in addition to the quality of neural representations within individual brain regions, listeners' success at the "cocktail party" is modulated based on how information is transferred among subcortical and cortical hubs of the auditory-linguistic network.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory scene analysis; Distributed source analysis; Event-related potentials (ERPs); Frequency-following response (FFR); Functional connectivity; Speech processing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29871826      PMCID: PMC6105463          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

1.  Acoustic noise and vision differentially warp the auditory categorization of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Lauren Sigley; Gwyneth A Lewis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Age-related hearing loss increases full-brain connectivity while reversing directed signaling within the dorsal-ventral pathway for speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Kelsey Mankel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Afferent-efferent connectivity between auditory brainstem and cortex accounts for poorer speech-in-noise comprehension in older adults.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Caitlin N Price; Dawei Shen; Stephen R Arnott; Claude Alain
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Frontal cortex selectively overrides auditory processing to bias perception for looming sonic motion.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Mark H Myers
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Plasticity in auditory categorization is supported by differential engagement of the auditory-linguistic network.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Breya Walker
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.

Authors:  Jared A Carter; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Sara Momtaz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.