Literature DB >> 33631210

Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.

Jared A Carter1, Gavin M Bidelman2.   

Abstract

Speech perception requires the grouping of acoustic information into meaningful phonetic units via the process of categorical perception (CP). Environmental masking influences speech perception and CP. However, it remains unclear at which stage of processing (encoding, decision, or both) masking affects listeners' categorization of speech signals. The purpose of this study was to determine whether linguistic interference influences the early acoustic-phonetic conversion process inherent to CP. To this end, we measured source level, event related brain potentials (ERPs) from auditory cortex (AC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) as listeners rapidly categorized speech sounds along a /da/ to /ga/ continuum presented in three listening conditions: quiet, and in the presence of forward (informational masker) and time-reversed (energetic masker) 2-talker babble noise. Maskers were matched in overall SNR and spectral content and thus varied only in their degree of linguistic interference (i.e., informational masking). We hypothesized a differential effect of informational versus energetic masking on behavioral and neural categorization responses, where we predicted increased activation of frontal regions when disambiguating speech from noise, especially during lexical-informational maskers. We found (1) informational masking weakens behavioral speech phoneme identification above and beyond energetic masking; (2) low-level AC activity not only codes speech categories but is susceptible to higher-order lexical interference; (3) identifying speech amidst noise recruits a cross hemispheric circuit (ACleft → IFGright) whose engagement varies according to task difficulty. These findings provide corroborating evidence for top-down influences on the early acoustic-phonetic analysis of speech through a coordinated interplay between frontotemporal brain areas.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs); Categorical perception (CP); Lexical effects; Speech-in-noise (SIN) processing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33631210      PMCID: PMC8049334          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  64 in total

1.  The correction of ocular artifacts: a topographic perspective.

Authors:  T W Picton; P van Roon; M L Armilio; P Berg; N Ille; M Scherg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception.

Authors:  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Christophe Pallier; Willy Serniclaes; Liliane Sprenger-Charolles; Antoinette Jobert; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Effects of language experience and stimulus context on the neural organization and categorical perception of speech.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Chia-Cheng Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Noise differentially impacts phoneme representations in the auditory and speech motor systems.

Authors:  Yi Du; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Cheryl L Grady; Claude Alain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: evidence for a phonetic mode.

Authors:  A M Liberman; D Isenberg; B Rakerd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-08

7.  Inferior frontal regions underlie the perception of phonetic category invariance.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Sheila E Blumstein; Edward Walsh; James Eliassen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-08

Review 8.  Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Richard J S Wise
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

10.  Lexical Influences on Categorical Speech Perception Are Driven by a Temporoparietal Circuit.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Claire Pearson; Ashleigh Harrison
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.420

View more
  2 in total

1.  Data-driven machine learning models for decoding speech categorization from evoked brain responses.

Authors:  Md Sultan Mahmud; Mohammed Yeasin; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Nonlinear dynamics in auditory cortical activity reveal the neural basis of perceptual warping in speech categorization.

Authors:  Jared A Carter; Eugene H Buder; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2022-04-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.