| Literature DB >> 29857583 |
Sara Gerhardt1, M Hasan Mohajeri2.
Abstract
In recent years evidence has emerged that neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are strongly associated with the microbiome composition in the gut. Parkinson's disease (PD) is the most intensively studied neurodegenerative disease in this context. In this review, we performed a systematic evaluation of the published literature comparing changes in colonic microbiome in PD to the ones observed in other NDs including Alzheimer's disease (AD), multiple system atrophy (MSA), multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). To enhance the comparability of different studies, only human case-control studies were included. Several studies showed an increase of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Verrucomicrobiaceae and Akkermansia in PD. A decrease of Faecalibacterium spp., Coprococcus spp., Blautia spp., Prevotella spp. and Prevotellaceae was observed in PD. On a low taxonomic resolution, like the phylum level, the changes are not disease-specific and are inconsistent. However, on a higher taxonomic resolution like genus or species level, a minor overlap was observed between PD and MSA, both alpha synucleinopathies. We show that standardization of sample collection and analysis is necessary for ensuring the reproducibility and comparability of data. We also provide evidence that assessing the microbiota composition at high taxonomic resolution reveals changes in relative abundance that may be specific to or characteristic of one disease or disease group, and might evolve discriminative power. The interactions between bacterial species and strains and the co-abundances must be investigated before assumptions about the effects of specific bacteria on the host can be made with certainty.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; gut microbiome; microbiota–gut–brain axis; neurodegenerative diseases
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29857583 PMCID: PMC6024871 DOI: 10.3390/nu10060708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Methodical approach of systematic review due to PRISMA criteria (PRISMA criteria [33]).
Changes in relative abundances in neurodegenerative diseases.
| Phylum and Family | Genus (Species, OTU) | AD | PD | MSA | NMO | MS | ALS | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified bacteria | PD: [ | |||||||
| Firmicutes | ||||||||
| Unspecified | AD: [ | |||||||
| unclassified | PD: [ | |||||||
| NMO: [ | ||||||||
| 91otu15265 | o1 = one OTU | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
| Lactobacillaceae | Unspec. | PD: [ | ||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| + | + | PD:, [ | ||||||
| Enterococcaceae | Unspec. | PD: [ | ||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| Enterococcus | PD: [ | |||||||
| Ruminococcaceae | Unspecified | + | AD: [ | |||||
| unclassified | ^ | PD: [ | ||||||
| + | PD, b: [ | |||||||
| + | PD: [ | |||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| + | + | PD: +o2: [ | ||||||
| Lachnospiraceae | Unspec. | PD: [ | ||||||
| Unclassified | + | + | PD, o3: [ | |||||
| ALS: [ | ||||||||
| + | PD: [ | |||||||
| + | PD: [ | |||||||
| + | + | AD: [ | ||||||
| + | PD: +l [ | |||||||
| + | MS, +h: [ | |||||||
| Catabacteriaceae | + | PD, +h: [ | ||||||
| Clostridiaceae | Unspec. | AD: [ | ||||||
| AD: [ | ||||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| + | + | AD: [ | ||||||
| Eubacteriaceae | +^ | + | PD, +b: [ | |||||
| [Candidatus Stoquefichus massiliensis] | PD: [ | |||||||
| Erysipelotrichaceae | PD: [ | |||||||
| AD: [ | ||||||||
| Christensenellaceae | unspecified | PD: [ | ||||||
| unclassified | PD: [ | |||||||
| + | PD, +m: [ | |||||||
| Gemellaceae | AD: [ | |||||||
| AD: [ | ||||||||
| Mogibacteriaceae | AD: [ | |||||||
| Oscillospiraceae | PD: [ | |||||||
| ALS: [ | ||||||||
| Streptococcaceae | PD: [ | |||||||
| + | PD: [ | |||||||
| Peptococcus | MS: [ | |||||||
| Peptostreptococcaceae | AD: [ | |||||||
| Acidaminococcaceae | AD: [ | |||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| Veillonellaceae | PD: [ | |||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| + | MS, f: [ | |||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| AD: [ | ||||||||
| Tissierellaceae | PD: [ | |||||||
| Turicibacteraceae | AD: [ | |||||||
| AD: [ | ||||||||
| Tenericutes | ||||||||
| Unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Acholeplasmataceae | NMO: [ | |||||||
| [Candidatus Phytoplasma] | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Melainabacteria | ||||||||
| OTU_171 (98.9% identity to MelB1,57) | PD, o1: [ | |||||||
| Actinobacteria | ||||||||
| Unspec. | AD: [ | |||||||
| Bifidobacteriaceae | Unspec. | AD: [ | ||||||
| AD: [ | ||||||||
| Coriobacteraceae | PD: [ | |||||||
| AD: [ | ||||||||
| MS: [ | ||||||||
| MS: [ | ||||||||
| MS: [ | ||||||||
| Corynebacteriaceae | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Fibrobacters | ||||||||
| unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Gemmatimonades | ||||||||
| 91otu1 0683 | o1 = one OTU | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
| Bacteroidetes | ||||||||
| Unspec. | AD: [ | |||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Bacteroidaceae | Unspec. | + | AD: [ | |||||
| + | AD: [ | |||||||
| + | PD, +m, c, d, p: [ | |||||||
| Flavobacteriaceae | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Prevotellaceae | Unspec | PD: [ | ||||||
| + | + | + | + | PD,+ co: [ | ||||
| + | + | PD, o1: [ | ||||||
| Porphyromonadaceae | Unspec. | MSA: [ | ||||||
| Unclass. | NMO: [ | |||||||
| MS: [ | ||||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| MS: [ | ||||||||
| Rikenellaceae | Unspec | AD: [ | ||||||
| + | AD: [ | |||||||
| Sphingobacteriaceae | MS: [ | |||||||
| Elusimicrobia | ||||||||
| 91otu12128 | o1 = one OTU | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
| Plantomycetes | ||||||||
| unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Verrucomicrobia | ||||||||
| Unspec | PD: [ | |||||||
| Verrucomicrobiaceae | Unspec. | PD: [ | ||||||
| Akkermansiaceae | + | PD: [ | ||||||
| [Chthoniobacteraceae] | DA101 = one OTU | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
| Acidobacteria | ||||||||
| 91oto412 | One OTU | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
| Spirochaetes | ||||||||
| Spirochaetaceae | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Proteobacteria | ||||||||
| unclassified | PD: [ | |||||||
| Alpha-Proteobacteria | ||||||||
| Unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Bradyrhizobiaceae | PD: [ | |||||||
| Brucellaceae | MS: [ | |||||||
| OTU_469, o1=one OTU | PD, o1: [ | |||||||
| Beta-Proteobacteria | ||||||||
| Sutterellaceae | + | MS, w: [ | ||||||
| Burkholderiacea | MSA: [ | |||||||
| Oxalobacteraceae | Unspec. | MSA: [ | ||||||
| Gamma-Proteobacteria | ||||||||
| Unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| Chromatiaceae | o1 = one OTU. | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
| Coxiellaceae | o1 = one OTU | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
| Enterobacteriaceae | Unspec. | PD: [ | ||||||
| Unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| ALS: [ | ||||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| Moraxellaceae | Unpec. | PD: [ | ||||||
| PD: [ | ||||||||
| Pasteurellaceae | Unspec. | PD: [ | ||||||
| Pseudomonadaceae | Pseudomonas | MS: [ | ||||||
| Delta-Proteobacteria | ||||||||
| Desulfovibrionaceae | AD: [ | |||||||
| MS: [ | ||||||||
| KSB3 | ||||||||
| unclassified | NMO: [ | |||||||
| 91otu6419 | 97otu28635 = one OTU | NMO, o1: [ | ||||||
AD: Alzheimer’s disease; PD: Parkinson’s disease; MSA: multiple sclerosis; NMO: neuromyelitis optica; MS: multiple sclerosis; ALS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; o1,2,3, symbolise that the change is concerning one, two, three or more operational taxonomic units (OTUs); letter = abbreviation for the species in which the change was observed; Small letters followed by a + indicate, that the change was observed for genus and species; Changes in relative abundance compared to the control, are colour coded. Green: Higher abundance in disease condition. Orange: Lower abundance in disease condition. Uncoloured: No study detected a significant change in abundance; - means no significant change in PD compared to HC was found with the chosen methodological approach. There are three intensity nuances for each colour to show how many of the included study found the same difference and direction. Light: one study; Middle: two studies; Dark: three or more studies. Coloured fields containing a + indicates, that detailed information concerning species type is found in the other columns.
Demographics and clinical data of Parkinson’s disease (PD) cases and human controls (HC).
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52/36 | 34/34 | 89/66 | 197/130 | 29/29 | 24/24 | 38/34 | 31/28 | 76/78 | 72/72 | |
| Gender %male | 40.4/58.3 | 70.6/52.9 | -- | 67.0/39.2 | 79.3/44.8 | 66.7/42.9 | 63.2/52.9 | 100 | 66/59 | 51.4/50.0 |
| Mean Age | 68.9/68.4 | 67.7/64.6 | 67/63 | 68.4/70.3 | 69.2/69.4 | 73.8/74.6 | 61.6/45.1 | 64.8/65.6 | 68.0/68.4 | 65.3/64.5 |
| Mean BMI | 20.2/22.6 | -- | 26.7/26.1 | 26.4/28.3 | -- | 23/24 | 26.0/27.6 | -- | 28.5/26.6 | 26.3/26.2 * |
This table shows the main demographic and clinical data of the participants in the 10 Parkinson’s studies. -- indicates that no information was found in the original publication; * Median BMI.
Richness, alpha diversity, beta diversity.
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indexes/Method | YF | PR | Ill Miseq | Ill Hiseq | Ro | |||||
| Faecal bacterial counts | > | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | n |
| Alpha diversity/Richness on at least one taxonomic level (Chao 1 index, *other indexes) | n | n | > | n | - | - | <* | - | n | - |
| Overall Beta diversity (weighted Unifrac, °other indexes) | n | n | sd | sd | sd ° | sd ° | n | ° | sd | |
This table shows the significant differences in faecal bacterial counts, alpha diversity/richness and beta diversity between healthy controls (HC) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). > symbolizes a higher abundance in HC when compared to PD; < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD; - symbolises that no statistical significant difference was found between HC and PD; sd indicates a statistically significantly difference; n symbolizes, that no information was given. The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro). * symbolzises that other alpha diversity indexes where used, like Shannon, Simpson and Richness (Margalef) [38]. ° symbolzises, that other beta diversity indexes where used, like unweighted Unifrac [36], Shannon [37] or univariate tests [39]
Firmicutes.
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa/Method | YF | PR | Ill Miseq | Ill Hiseq | Ro | ||||||
| Unclassified Firmicutes (unclass.) | < | ||||||||||
| Firmicutes unspecified (unspec.) | > | ||||||||||
| Lactobacillaceae unspec. | > | < | < | < | |||||||
| Lactobacillus, m = mucosae, | <(+g, c, f, re, ru) | <(+m) | < | ||||||||
| Enterococcaceae unspec | > | < | < | ||||||||
| Enterococcus | < | ||||||||||
| Ruminococcaceae unclassified | < | ||||||||||
| Ruminococcaceae OTU 4439469 | <(o1) | < | |||||||||
| Ruminococcus, b = bromii, c = callidus | <(b) | >(c) | > | ||||||||
| Papillibacter c = cinnamivorans | <(c) | ||||||||||
| Faecalibacterium, p = prausnitzi | >(p) | > | >(o2) | > | |||||||
| Lachnospiraceae unclassified | >(o3) | ||||||||||
| Lachnospiraceae unspec | > | ||||||||||
| Roseburia | >(+o2) | > | |||||||||
| Coprococcus, e = eutactus | >(e) | >(o1) | > | ||||||||
| Blautia, g = glucerasea | >(g) | >(+o1) | > | > | |||||||
| Dorea, l = longicatea | >(+l) | ||||||||||
| Catabacteriaceae Catabacter, h = honkongenesis | <(+h) | ||||||||||
| Clostridiaceae Anaerotruncus | < | ||||||||||
| Clostridium, c = coccoides, s = saccharolyticum | >(c) | >(s) | |||||||||
| Eubacteriaceae, [candidatus stoquefichus massiliensis] | > | ||||||||||
| Erysipeltrichoceae unspec. | < | ||||||||||
| Eubacterium, b = biforme | >(b) | ||||||||||
| Christensenellaceae unclass. | < | ||||||||||
| unspec | < | ||||||||||
| Christensenella, m = minuta | <(+m) | ||||||||||
| Oscillospiraceae, oscillospira | < | < | |||||||||
| Streptococcaceae, unspec | < | ||||||||||
| Streptococcus | < | ||||||||||
| Acidaminococcaceae, Acidaminococcus | < | ||||||||||
| Veillonellaceae unspec | < | ||||||||||
| Veillonellaceae, Megamonas | < | ||||||||||
| Veillonellaceae Megasphera | < | ||||||||||
| [Tissierellaceae] unspec. | < | ||||||||||
This table shows the significant relative changes in the Firmicutes phyla between PD patients (PD) and healthy controls (HC), that were assessed by the 10 summarized Parkinson’s disease studies. > symbolizes a higher abundance in HC when compared to PD; < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD; An empty cell symbolizes, that no significant change in PD compared to HC was found with the chosen methodological approach. o1, 2, 3 symbolize, that one, two, or three OTUs of the taxa were significantly changed in PD compared to HC; + indicates that a change in PD compared to HC on the genus and on the species level was found. The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro).
Actinobacteria.
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa/Method | YF | PR | Ill Miseq | Ill Hiseq | Ro | |||||
| Unspec | < | |||||||||
| Bifidobacteriaceae, Unspec. | < | |||||||||
| Bifidobacteriaceae, Bifidobacterium | < | < | < | |||||||
| Coriobacteriaceae, Unspec | < | |||||||||
This table shows the significant relative changes in Actinobacteria between PD patients (PD) and healthy controls (HC), that were assessed by the 10 summarized Parkinson’s disease studies. < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD; Empty cells symbolize, that no significant change in PD compared to HC was found with the chosen methodological approach.The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro).
Bacteroidetes.
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa/Method | YF | PR | Ill Miseq | Ill Hiseq | Ro | |||||
| Unspec | > | > | < | |||||||
| Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides | >(f) | >(+m, c, d, p) | < | |||||||
| Prevotellaceae, Unspec | > | |||||||||
| Prevotellaceae, Prevotella, co = copri | > (+co) | <(o1) | >(+co) | |||||||
| Porphyromonadaceae, Parabacteroides | < | |||||||||
| Porphyromonadaceae, Barnesiella | < | |||||||||
| Rickenellaceae, Alistipes, s = shahii | <(s) | |||||||||
This table shows the significant relative changes in Firmicute phyla between PD patients (PD) and healthy controls (HC), that were assessed by the 10 summarized Parkinson’s disease studies. > symbolizes a higher abundance in HC when compared to PD; < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD;empty cells symbolize, that no significant change in PD compared to HC was found with the chosen methodological approach . o1symbolizes, that one OTU of the taxa were significantly changed in PD compared to HC; + indicates that a change in PD compared to HC on the genus and on the species level was found. The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro).
Verrucomicrobia.
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa/Method | YF | PR | Ill Miseq | Ill Hiseq | Ro | |||||
| Unspec | < | |||||||||
| Verrucomicrobiaceae, Unspec | < | < | < | < | ||||||
| Akkermansiaceae, Akkermansia, m = muciphila | < | < | < (+m) | < | ||||||
This table shows the significant relative changes in Firmicute phyla between PD patients (PD) and healthy controls (HC), that were assessed by the 10 summarized Parkinson’s disease studies. < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD; empty cells symbolize, that no significant change in PD compared to HC was found with the chosen methodological approach. + indicates that a change in PD compared to HC on the genus and on the species level was found. The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro).
Proteobacteria.
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa/Method | YF | PR | Ill Miseq | Ill Hiseq | Ro | |||||
| Unclassified | < | |||||||||
| Alpha-proteobacteria, Bradyrhizobiaceae, unspec | < | |||||||||
| OTU 469 (o1 = one OTU) | > | |||||||||
| Gamma-Proteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Unspec | < | < | ||||||||
| Gamma-Proteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia/Shigella | < | |||||||||
| Gamma-Proteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Proteus | < | |||||||||
| Gamma-Proteobacteria, Moraxellaceae, Unspec | < | |||||||||
| Gamma-Proteobacteria, Moraxellaceae, Acinetobacter | < | |||||||||
| Gamma-Proteobacteria, Pasteurellaceae, unspec. | > | |||||||||
This table shows the significant relative changes in the Firmicutes phyla between PD patients (PD) and healthy controls (HC), that were assessed by the 10 summarized Parkinson’s disease studies. > symbolizes a higher abundance in HC when compared to PD; < symbolizes a lower abundance in HC when compared to PD; empty cells symbolize, that no significant change in PD compared to HC was found with the chosen methodological approach. The methods used by the studies are Yakult Intestinal Flora-SCAN (YF), 96-well block of the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (PR), Illumina Miseq sequencing (Ill Miseq), Illumina Hiseq sequencing (Ill Hiseq), Roche 454 GS FLX Titanium sequencing (Ro).