| Literature DB >> 28449715 |
J R Bedarf1,2, F Hildebrand3, L P Coelho3, S Sunagawa3,4, M Bahram5,6, F Goeser7,8, P Bork9,10,11,12,13, U Wüllner14,15,16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) presently is conceptualized as a protein aggregation disease in which pathology involves both the enteric and the central nervous system, possibly spreading from one to another via the vagus nerves. As gastrointestinal dysfunction often precedes or parallels motor symptoms, the enteric system with its vast diversity of microorganisms may be involved in PD pathogenesis. Alterations in the enteric microbial taxonomic level of L-DOPA-naïve PD patients might also serve as a biomarker.Entities:
Keywords: Archaea; Bacteria; Enteric nervous system; Gut-brain axis; Microbiome; Parkinson; Viruses
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28449715 PMCID: PMC5408370 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-017-0428-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Clinical characteristics and general demographic parameters of study participants
| PD | Control |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| n | 31 | 28 | |
| Age (years, mean ± SD) | 64.8 ± 9.5 | 65.6 ± 10.4 | 0.970 |
| Clinical data | |||
| UPDRS III (mean ± SD) | 12.6 ± 6.9 | 0 ± 0 | <0.001 |
| GIT symptoms incl. constipation (GSRS, mean ± SD) | 3.4 ± 2.9 | 2.2 ± 2.0 | 0.172 |
| Total serum bilirubin | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.593 |
| Nutritional habits | |||
| Diet | |||
| Omnivorous | 30 [96.8%] | 28 [100%] | |
| Vegetarian | 1 [3.2%] | 0 [0%] | |
| Probiotics | 4 [12.9%] | 1 [3.6%] | |
| Medication | |||
| Amantadine | 26 [83.9%] | 0 [0%] | |
| Dopamine agonist | 11 [35.5%] | 0 [0%] | |
| MAO inhibitor | 28 [90.3%] | 0 [0%] | |
| L-DOPA | 0 [0%] | 0 [0%] | |
| Statin intake | 1 [3.2%] | 11 [39.3%] | |
| Metformin | 1 [3.2%] | 3 [10.7%] | |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 2 [6.5%] | 7 [25.0%] | |
| Smoking | |||
| No | 10 [32.3%] | 9 [32.1%] | |
| Yes | 5 [16.1%] | 4 [14.3%] | |
| Ex-smoker | 15 [48.4%] | 15 [53.6%] | |
UPDRS Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, GIT gastrointestinal, GSRS Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale, MAO monoamine oxidase, L-DOPA Levodopa
Fig. 1Genus and species level differences in PD participants and controls. a NMDS ordination of all samples used in this study, using a Bray–Curtis between-sample distance at genus level. This shows the composition relatedness of samples and that PD samples form a subgroup. Outliers denoted with # took antibiotics in a period of 28–34 days prior to feces sampling. See also Additional file 2 for taxonomic analysis while taking these samples into account. b Genus-level sample composition. c The most significant species or groups of taxa that could not be further classified. Unclassified Prevotella is not significant after multiple testing, but was implied in PD in several studies (see “Discussion”). d Species correlating strongest to PD disease severity (as measured by UPDRS III). Note that after multiple testing correction, these are all q > 0.1
Fig. 2Functional differences in PD patients based on selected metabolic pathways. a Phylum and (b) genus level composition of six modules that were increased/decreased in PD patients. c All genera were contributing to these modules as expected by random chance, with the exception of MF0065 and MF0118, where a higher than expected proportion of reads contributing could be traced to Eubacterium in PD patients
Fig. 3Classification of PD participants based on their microbiome. Here the classifier selected a very similar set of features as were determined by univariate testing (Fig. 1). With only six genera, PD could be separated from control patients with an AUC of 0.84. The exact mOTU composition of each feature is given in Additional file 15
Fig. 4Structural equation modeling (SEM). SEM analysis of PD in relation to key correlating bacterial functions and taxa (MSEA = 0, PCLOSE = 0.79, AIC = 59.385). Values on paths and boxes are standardized regression and determination coefficients (R2), respectively. Dashed lines and red colors denote negative relationships. The thickness of lines is proportional to regression coefficients. All relationships are statistically significant (P < 0.05, Additional file 5). AIC Akaike information criterion, MSEA mean square error of approximation, PCLOSE probability of close fit