Literature DB >> 29855702

Later springs green-up faster: the relation between onset and completion of green-up in deciduous forests of North America.

Stephen Klosterman1, Koen Hufkens2,3,4, Andrew D Richardson2,5,6.   

Abstract

In deciduous forests, spring leaf phenology controls the onset of numerous ecosystem functions. While most studies have focused on a single annual spring event, such as budburst, ecosystem functions like photosynthesis and transpiration increase gradually after budburst, as leaves grow to their mature size. Here, we examine the "velocity of green-up," or duration between budburst and leaf maturity, in deciduous forest ecosystems of eastern North America. We use a diverse data set that includes 301 site-years of phenocam data across a range of sites, as well as 22 years of direct ground observations of individual trees and 3 years of fine-scale high-frequency aerial photography, both from Harvard Forest. We find a significant association between later start of spring and faster green-up: - 0.47 ± 0.04 (slope ± 1 SE) days change in length of green-up for every day later start of spring within phenocam sites, - 0.31 ± 0.06 days/day for trees under direct observation, and - 1.61 ± 0.08 days/day spatially across fine-scale landscape units. To explore the climatic drivers of spring leaf development, we fit degree-day models to the observational data from Harvard Forest. We find that the default phenology parameters of the ecosystem model PnET make biased predictions of leaf initiation (39 days early) and maturity (13 days late) for red oak, while the optimized model has biases of 1 day or less. Springtime productivity predictions using optimized parameters are closer to results driven by observational data (within 1%) than those of the default parameterization (17% difference). Our study advances empirical understanding of the link between early and late spring phenophases and demonstrates that accurately modeling these transitions is important for simulating seasonal variation in ecosystem productivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem model; Forest productivity; Green-up; North America; Phenology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29855702     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-018-1564-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  16 in total

1.  An observation-based progression modeling approach to spring and autumn deciduous tree phenology.

Authors:  Rong Yu; Mark D Schwartz; Alison Donnelly; Liang Liang
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Multiscale modeling of spring phenology across Deciduous Forests in the Eastern United States.

Authors:  Eli K Melaas; Mark A Friedl; Andrew D Richardson
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Responses of canopy duration to temperature changes in four temperate tree species: relative contributions of spring and autumn leaf phenology.

Authors:  Yann Vitasse; Annabel Josée Porté; Antoine Kremer; Richard Michalet; Sylvain Delzon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Ecology. Phenology feedbacks on climate change.

Authors:  Josep Peñuelas; This Rutishauser; Iolanda Filella
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems.

Authors:  John D Aber; C Anthony Federer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Extrapolating leaf CO2 exchange to the canopy: a generalized model of forest photosynthesis compared with measurements by eddy correlation.

Authors:  John D Aber; Peter B Reich; Michael L Goulden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse North American biomes using PhenoCam imagery.

Authors:  Andrew D Richardson; Koen Hufkens; Tom Milliman; Donald M Aubrecht; Min Chen; Josh M Gray; Miriam R Johnston; Trevor F Keenan; Stephen T Klosterman; Margaret Kosmala; Eli K Melaas; Mark A Friedl; Steve Frolking
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 8.501

8.  Transitions in high-Arctic vegetation growth patterns and ecosystem productivity tracked with automated cameras from 2000 to 2013.

Authors:  Andreas Westergaard-Nielsen; Magnus Lund; Stine Højlund Pedersen; Niels Martin Schmidt; Stephen Klosterman; Jakob Abermann; Birger Ulf Hansen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Predicting climate change impacts on the amount and duration of autumn colors in a New England forest.

Authors:  Marco Archetti; Andrew D Richardson; John O'Keefe; Nicolas Delpierre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mismatch between birth date and vegetation phenology slows the demography of roe deer.

Authors:  Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tim Coulson; A J Mark Hewison; Daniel Delorme; Claude Warnant; Christophe Bonenfant
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phenological responses of temperate and boreal trees to warming depend on ambient spring temperatures, leaf habit, and geographic range.

Authors:  Rebecca A Montgomery; Karen E Rice; Artur Stefanski; Roy L Rich; Peter B Reich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Rethinking false spring risk.

Authors:  Catherine J Chamberlain; Benjamin I Cook; Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri; Elizabeth M Wolkovich
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 10.863

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.