Literature DB >> 26456080

Multiscale modeling of spring phenology across Deciduous Forests in the Eastern United States.

Eli K Melaas1, Mark A Friedl1, Andrew D Richardson2.   

Abstract

Phenological events, such as bud burst, are strongly linked to ecosystem processes in temperate deciduous forests. However, the exact nature and magnitude of how seasonal and interannual variation in air temperatures influence phenology is poorly understood, and model-based phenology representations fail to capture local- to regional-scale variability arising from differences in species composition. In this paper, we use a combination of surface meteorological data, species composition maps, remote sensing, and ground-based observations to estimate models that better represent how community-level species composition affects the phenological response of deciduous broadleaf forests to climate forcing at spatial scales that are typically used in ecosystem models. Using time series of canopy greenness from repeat digital photography, citizen science data from the USA National Phenology Network, and satellite remote sensing-based observations of phenology, we estimated and tested models that predict the timing of spring leaf emergence across five different deciduous broadleaf forest types in the eastern United States. Specifically, we evaluated two different approaches: (i) using species-specific models in combination with species composition information to 'upscale' model predictions and (ii) using repeat digital photography of forest canopies that observe and integrate the phenological behavior of multiple representative species at each camera site to calibrate a single model for all deciduous broadleaf forests. Our results demonstrate variability in cumulative forcing requirements and photoperiod cues across species and forest types, and show how community composition influences phenological dynamics over large areas. At the same time, the response of different species to spatial and interannual variation in weather is, under the current climate regime, sufficiently similar that the generic deciduous forest model based on repeat digital photography performed comparably to the upscaled species-specific models. More generally, results from this analysis demonstrate how in situ observation networks and remote sensing data can be used to synergistically calibrate and assess regional parameterizations of phenology in models.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  MODIS; deciduous forest; phenology models; species composition; spring phenology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26456080     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  9 in total

1.  Later springs green-up faster: the relation between onset and completion of green-up in deciduous forests of North America.

Authors:  Stephen Klosterman; Koen Hufkens; Andrew D Richardson
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse North American biomes using PhenoCam imagery.

Authors:  Andrew D Richardson; Koen Hufkens; Tom Milliman; Donald M Aubrecht; Min Chen; Josh M Gray; Miriam R Johnston; Trevor F Keenan; Stephen T Klosterman; Margaret Kosmala; Eli K Melaas; Mark A Friedl; Steve Frolking
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 8.501

3.  Automated data-intensive forecasting of plant phenology throughout the United States.

Authors:  Shawn D Taylor; Ethan P White
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  Extracting Plant Phenology Metrics in a Great Basin Watershed: Methods and Considerations for Quantifying Phenophases in a Cold Desert.

Authors:  Keirith A Snyder; Bryce L Wehan; Gianluca Filippa; Justin L Huntington; Tamzen K Stringham; Devon K Snyder
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Comparison of large-scale citizen science data and long-term study data for phenology modeling.

Authors:  Shawn D Taylor; Joan M Meiners; Kristina Riemer; Michael C Orr; Ethan P White
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Testing Hopkins' Bioclimatic Law with PhenoCam data.

Authors:  Andrew D Richardson; Koen Hufkens; Xiaolu Li; Toby R Ault
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Comparison of Landsat and Land-Based Phenology Camera Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for Dominant Plant Communities in the Great Basin.

Authors:  Keirith A Snyder; Justin L Huntington; Bryce L Wehan; Charles G Morton; Tamzen K Stringham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  USA National Phenology Network's volunteer-contributed observations yield predictive models of phenological transitions.

Authors:  Theresa M Crimmins; Michael A Crimmins; Katharine L Gerst; Alyssa H Rosemartin; Jake F Weltzin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Seasonal variation in the canopy color of temperate evergreen conifer forests.

Authors:  Bijan Seyednasrollah; David R Bowling; Rui Cheng; Barry A Logan; Troy S Magney; Christian Frankenberg; Julia C Yang; Adam M Young; Koen Hufkens; M Altaf Arain; T Andrew Black; Peter D Blanken; Rosvel Bracho; Rachhpal Jassal; David Y Hollinger; Beverly E Law; Zoran Nesic; Andrew D Richardson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 10.323

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.