Literature DB >> 30953573

Rethinking false spring risk.

Catherine J Chamberlain1,2, Benjamin I Cook3, Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri4, Elizabeth M Wolkovich1,2,5.   

Abstract

Temperate plants are at risk of being exposed to late spring freezes. These freeze events-often called false springs-are one of the strongest factors determining temperate plants species range limits and can impose high ecological and economic damage. As climate change may alter the prevalence and severity of false springs, our ability to forecast such events has become more critical, and it has led to a growing body of research. Many false spring studies largely simplify the myriad complexities involved in assessing false spring risks and damage. While these studies have helped advance the field and may provide useful estimates at large scales, studies at the individual to community levels must integrate more complexity for accurate predictions of plant damage from late spring freezes. Here, we review current metrics of false spring, and how, when, and where plants are most at risk of freeze damage. We highlight how life stage, functional group, species differences in morphology and phenology, and regional climatic differences contribute to the damage potential of false springs. More studies aimed at understanding relationships among species tolerance and avoidance strategies, climatic regimes, and the environmental cues that underlie spring phenology would improve predictions at all biological levels. An integrated approach to assessing past and future spring freeze damage would provide novel insights into fundamental plant biology and offer more robust predictions as climate change progresses, which are essential for mitigating the adverse ecological and economic effects of false springs.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; false spring; forest communities; freezing tolerance; phenology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30953573      PMCID: PMC8844870          DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  35 in total

1.  Specific and unspecific responses of plants to cold and drought stress.

Authors:  Erwin H Beck; Sebastian Fettig; Claudia Knake; Katja Hartig; Tribikram Bhattarai
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Frost hardening and dehardening potential in temperate trees from winter to budburst.

Authors:  Amarante Vitra; Armando Lenz; Yann Vitasse
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Are budburst dates, dormancy and cold acclimation in walnut trees (Juglans regia L.) under mainly genotypic or environmental control?

Authors:  Guillaume Charrier; Marc Bonhomme; André Lacointe; Thierry Améglio
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Reconstructing patterns of temperature, phenology, and frost damage over 124 years: spring damage risk is increasing.

Authors:  Carol K Augspurger
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  The ecological significance of phenology in four different tree species: effects of light and temperature on bud burst.

Authors:  Amelia Caffarra; Alison Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem.

Authors:  Elsa E Cleland; Nona R Chiariello; Scott R Loarie; Harold A Mooney; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Variation in cold hardiness and carbohydrate concentration from dormancy induction to bud burst among provenances of three European oak species.

Authors:  Xavier Morin; Thierry Améglio; Rein Ahas; Cathy Kurz-Besson; Vojtech Lanta; François Lebourgeois; Franco Miglietta; Isabelle Chuine
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Effects of climate change on phenology, frost damage, and floral abundance of montane wildflowers.

Authors:  David W Inouye
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Tradeoffs between chilling and forcing in satisfying dormancy requirements for Pacific Northwest tree species.

Authors:  Constance A Harrington; Peter J Gould
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  A plant's perspective of extremes: terrestrial plant responses to changing climatic variability.

Authors:  Christopher P O Reyer; Sebastian Leuzinger; Anja Rammig; Annett Wolf; Ruud P Bartholomeus; Antonello Bonfante; Francesca de Lorenzi; Marie Dury; Philipp Gloning; Renée Abou Jaoudé; Tamir Klein; Thomas M Kuster; Monica Martins; Georg Niedrist; Maria Riccardi; Georg Wohlfahrt; Paolo de Angelis; Giovanbattista de Dato; Louis François; Annette Menzel; Marízia Pereira
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  4 in total

1.  Woody species do not differ in dormancy progression: Differences in time to budbreak due to forcing and cold hardiness.

Authors:  Al P Kovaleski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of DREB genes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in response to cold stress.

Authors:  Song Sheng; Xinyu Guo; Changzheng Wu; Yucheng Xiang; Shuhui Duan; Weiqin Yang; Wenrui Li; Fengchun Cao; Laihua Liu
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2022-12-31

3.  Peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] Cultivars Differ in Apparent Base Temperature and Growing Degree Hour Requirement for Floral Bud Break.

Authors:  Douglas G Bielenberg; Ksenija Gasic
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Extending the Cultivation Area of Pecan (Carya illinoinensis) Toward the South in Southeastern Subtropical China May Cause Increased Cold Damage.

Authors:  Jinbin Zheng; Heikki Hänninen; Jianhong Lin; Sitian Shen; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.