Literature DB >> 26219605

An observation-based progression modeling approach to spring and autumn deciduous tree phenology.

Rong Yu1,2, Mark D Schwartz3, Alison Donnelly3, Liang Liang4.   

Abstract

It is important to accurately determine the response of spring and autumn phenology to climate change in forest ecosystems, as phenological variations affect carbon balance, forest productivity, and biodiversity. We observed phenology intensively throughout spring and autumn in a temperate deciduous woodlot at Milwaukee, WI, USA, during 2007-2012. Twenty-four phenophase levels in spring and eight in autumn were recorded for 106 trees, including white ash, basswood, white oak, boxelder, red oak, and hophornbeam. Our phenological progression models revealed that accumulated degree-days and day length explained 87.9-93.4 % of the variation in spring canopy development and 75.8-89.1 % of the variation in autumn senescence. In addition, the timing of community-level spring and autumn phenophases and the length of the growing season from 1871 to 2012 were reconstructed with the models developed. All simulated spring phenophases significantly advanced at a rate from 0.24 to 0.48 days/decade (p ≤ 0.001) during the 1871-2012 period and from 1.58 to 2.00 days/decade (p < 0.02) during the 1970-2012 period; two simulated autumn phenophases were significantly delayed at a rate of 0.37 (mid-leaf coloration) and 0.50 (full-leaf coloration) days/decade (p < 0.01) during the 1970-2012 period. Consequently, the simulated growing season lengthened at a rate of 0.45 and 2.50 days/decade (p < =0.001), respectively, during the two periods. Our results further showed the variability of responses to climate between early and late spring phenophases, as well as between leaf coloration and leaf fall, and suggested accelerating simulated ecosystem responses to climate warming over the last four decades in comparison to the past 142 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accumulated degree-days; Autumn senescence; Canopy development; Day length; Intensive observations; Phenological progression model

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26219605     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-015-1031-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  18 in total

1.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change.

Authors:  E M Wolkovich; B I Cook; J M Allen; T M Crimmins; J L Betancourt; S E Travers; S Pau; J Regetz; T J Davies; N J B Kraft; T R Ault; K Bolmgren; S J Mazer; G J McCabe; B J McGill; C Parmesan; N Salamin; M D Schwartz; E E Cleland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity.

Authors:  Andrew D Richardson; T Andy Black; Philippe Ciais; Nicolas Delbart; Mark A Friedl; Nadine Gobron; David Y Hollinger; Werner L Kutsch; Bernard Longdoz; Sebastiaan Luyssaert; Mirco Migliavacca; Leonardo Montagnani; J William Munger; Eddy Moors; Shilong Piao; Corinna Rebmann; Markus Reichstein; Nobuko Saigusa; Enrico Tomelleri; Rodrigo Vargas; Andrej Varlagin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change.

Authors:  Gian-Reto Walther
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  A cellular timetable of autumn senescence.

Authors:  Johanna Keskitalo; Gustaf Bergquist; Per Gardeström; Stefan Jansson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Responses of canopy duration to temperature changes in four temperate tree species: relative contributions of spring and autumn leaf phenology.

Authors:  Yann Vitasse; Annabel Josée Porté; Antoine Kremer; Richard Michalet; Sylvain Delzon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Ecology. Phenology feedbacks on climate change.

Authors:  Josep Peñuelas; This Rutishauser; Iolanda Filella
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Phenological responses of Ulmus pumila (Siberian Elm) to climate change in the temperate zone of China.

Authors:  Xiaoqiu Chen; Lin Xu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.787

9.  Testing a growth efficiency hypothesis with continental-scale phenological variations of common and cloned plants.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Mark D Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.787

10.  Predicting climate change impacts on the amount and duration of autumn colors in a New England forest.

Authors:  Marco Archetti; Andrew D Richardson; John O'Keefe; Nicolas Delpierre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Phenological model of bird cherry Padus racemosa with data assimilation.

Authors:  Andis Kalvāns; Tija Sīle; Gunta Kalvāne
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  The rise of phenology with climate change: an evaluation of IJB publications.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Rong Yu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Later springs green-up faster: the relation between onset and completion of green-up in deciduous forests of North America.

Authors:  Stephen Klosterman; Koen Hufkens; Andrew D Richardson
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Spatial and temporal changes in leaf coloring date of Acer palmatum and Ginkgo biloba in response to temperature increases in South Korea.

Authors:  Chang-Kyun Park; Chang-Hoi Ho; Su-Jong Jeong; Eun Ju Lee; Jinwon Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.