Literature DB >> 32341148

Phenological responses of temperate and boreal trees to warming depend on ambient spring temperatures, leaf habit, and geographic range.

Rebecca A Montgomery1, Karen E Rice2,3, Artur Stefanski2, Roy L Rich2,4, Peter B Reich2,5.   

Abstract

Changes in plant phenology associated with climate change have been observed globally. What is poorly known is whether and how phenological responses to climate warming will differ from year to year, season to season, habitat to habitat, or species to species. Here, we present 5 y of phenological responses to experimental warming for 10 subboreal tree species. Research took place in the open-air B4WarmED experiment in Minnesota. The design is a two habitat (understory and open) × three warming treatments (ambient, +1.7 °C, +3.4 °C) factorial at two sites. Phenology was measured twice weekly during the growing seasons of 2009 through 2013. We found significant interannual variation in the effect of warming and differences among species in response to warming that relate to geographic origin and plant functional group. Moreover, responses to experimental temperature variation were similar to responses to natural temperature variation. Warming advanced the date of budburst more in early compared to late springs, suggesting that to simulate interannual variability in climate sensitivity of phenology, models should employ process-based or continuous development approaches. Differences among species in timing of budburst were also greater in early compared to late springs. Our results suggest that climate change-which will make most springs relatively "early"-could lead to a future with more variable phenology among years and among species, with consequences including greater risk of inappropriately early leafing and altered interactions among species.

Keywords:  boreal forest; climate change; growing season length; phenology; temperate forest

Year:  2020        PMID: 32341148      PMCID: PMC7229751          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917508117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change.

Authors:  E M Wolkovich; B I Cook; J M Allen; T M Crimmins; J L Betancourt; S E Travers; S Pau; J Regetz; T J Davies; N J B Kraft; T R Ault; K Bolmgren; S J Mazer; G J McCabe; B J McGill; C Parmesan; N Salamin; M D Schwartz; E E Cleland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Photoperiodic regulation of the seasonal pattern of photosynthetic capacity and the implications for carbon cycling.

Authors:  William L Bauerle; Ram Oren; Danielle A Way; Song S Qian; Paul C Stoy; Peter E Thornton; Joseph D Bowden; Forrest M Hoffman; Robert F Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chilling outweighs photoperiod in preventing precocious spring development.

Authors:  Julia Laube; Tim H Sparks; Nicole Estrella; Josef Höfler; Donna P Ankerst; Annette Menzel
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Tree leaf out response to temperature: comparing field observations, remote sensing, and a warming experiment.

Authors:  Caroline A Polgar; Richard B Primack; Jeffrey S Dukes; Crystal Schaaf; Zhuosen Wang; Susanne S Hoeppner
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.787

6.  Spring predictability explains different leaf-out strategies in the woody floras of North America, Europe and East Asia.

Authors:  Constantin M Zohner; Blas M Benito; Jason D Fridley; Jens-Christian Svenning; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Later springs green-up faster: the relation between onset and completion of green-up in deciduous forests of North America.

Authors:  Stephen Klosterman; Koen Hufkens; Andrew D Richardson
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.787

8.  Common garden comparison of the leaf-out phenology of woody species from different native climates, combined with herbarium records, forecasts long-term change.

Authors:  Constantin M Zohner; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Shifts in flowering phenology reshape a subalpine plant community.

Authors:  Paul J CaraDonna; Amy M Iler; David W Inouye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Phenological responses to multiple environmental drivers under climate change: insights from a long-term observational study and a manipulative field experiment.

Authors:  Susana M Wadgymar; Jane E Ogilvie; David W Inouye; Arthur E Weis; Jill T Anderson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  4 in total

1.  An earlier start of the thermal growing season enhances tree growth in cold humid areas but not in dry areas.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Eryuan Liang; Ruishun Liu; Flurin Babst; J Julio Camarero; Yongshuo H Fu; Shilong Piao; Sergio Rossi; Miaogen Shen; Tao Wang; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 19.100

2.  Woody species do not differ in dormancy progression: Differences in time to budbreak due to forcing and cold hardiness.

Authors:  Al P Kovaleski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Drought timing and species growth phenology determine intra-annual recovery of tree height and diameter growth.

Authors:  Ruth van Kampen; Nicholas Fisichelli; Yong-Jiang Zhang; Jay Wason
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.138

4.  Climate change and tree growth in the Khakass-Minusinsk Depression (South Siberia) impacted by large water reservoirs.

Authors:  D F Zhirnova; L V Belokopytova; D M Meko; E A Babushkina; E A Vaganov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.