| Literature DB >> 29805715 |
Xia He1, Jian-Pei Li1, Xiao-Hua Liu1, Jing-Ping Zhang1, Qiu-Yao Zeng1, Hao Chen1, Shu-Lin Chen1.
Abstract
Background: Many studies have shown the prognostic value of inflammation based factors in different cancers. This work aimed to explore the prognostic value of pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio in patients with cervical cancer, and compared to other inflammatory prognostic factors, such as neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR), Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), prognostic index (PI), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), clinicopathological parameter and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag).Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein/albumin ratio; Cervical cancer; inflammation based factors; neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio(NLR); overall survival
Year: 2018 PMID: 29805715 PMCID: PMC5968777 DOI: 10.7150/jca.23320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Pretreatment inflammatory parameters for overall survival indentified by univariate and multivariate analyses
| All patients (n=229) | SCC group (n=198) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR (95 % CI) | HR (95 % CI) | HR (95 % CI) | HR (95 % CI) | |||||
| < 44/≥ 44 | 1.50(0.82-2.74) | 0.185 | 1.65(0.86-3.17) | 0.135 | ||||
| Ⅰ/Ⅱ/Ⅲand Ⅳ | 3.26(2.20-4.81) | <0.001* | 2.13(1.38-3.27) | 0.001* | 2.81(1.84-4.29) | <0.001* | 1.58(0.99-2.55) | 0.058 |
| Sqc/ Adc/ Asc | 0.80(0.38-1.67) | 0.551 | ||||||
| G1 and G2/ G3 | 1.44(0.81-2.56) | 0.210 | 1.55(0.83-2.89) | 0.170 | ||||
| < 4/≥4 | 2.10(1.18-3.75) | 0.012* | 1.80(0.96-3.38) | 0.069 | ||||
| No/ Yes | 0.30(0.17-0.54) | <0.001* | 0.47(0.26-0.85) | 0.013* | 0.30(0.16-0.55) | <0.001* | 0.41(0.22-0.79) | 0.008* |
| Sur / Sur and Che and(or) Rad/ Che and (or) Rad | 4.28(2.55-7.18) | <0.001* | 2.77(1.56-4.91) | 0.001* | 3.80(2.18-6.64) | <0.001* | 2.72(1.46-5.07) | 0.002* |
| ≤ 1.60/> 1.60 | 2.64(1.24-5.64) | 0.012* | 2.47(1.15-5.31) | 0.020* | 2.51(1.16-5.42) | 0.019* | 2.28(1.05-4.97) | 0.038* |
| ≤ 149.27 / > 149.27 | 1.95(1.10-3.43) | 0.021* | 1.64(0.89-3.01) | 0.115 | ||||
| ≤ 7.0/> 7.0 | 2.11(0.94-4.70) | 0.069 | 2.36(0.99-5.61) | 0.052 | ||||
| ≤ 10.0/> 10.0 | 3.02(1.41-6.46) | 0.004* | 3.03(1.34-6.82) | 0.008* | ||||
| ≥35.0/ <35.0 | 0.602(0.08-4.36) | 0.615 | ||||||
| ≤ 0.022/> 0.022 | 3.18(1.54-6.57) | 0.002* | 3.49(1.55-7.85) | 0.003* | 2.36(1.02-5.47) | 0.045* | ||
| 0/1/2 | 3.02(1.41-6.46) | 0.004* | 3.03(1.34-6.82) | 0.008* | ||||
| 0/1/2 | 1.82(1.13-2.92) | 0.013* | 1.95(1.16-3.27) | 0.011* | ||||
| 0/1 | 2.30(0.56-9.50) | 0.248 | 2.29(0.55-9.49) | 0.252 | ||||
| ≤ 1.5/> 1.5 | 2.40(1.35-4.27) | 0.003* | 2.84(1.50-5.40) | 0.001* | ||||
| NLR-low+CRP/Alb-low/NLR-high or CRP/Alb-high/NLR-high+CRP/Alb-high | 2.72(1.63-4.54) | <0.001* | 2.22(1.30-3.80) | 0.003* | 2.63(1.54-4.48) | <0.001* | 2.32(1.32-4.07) | 0.003* |
*Statistically significant prognostic factor identified by univariate/multivariate analysis.
Abbreviation: FIGO: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sqc: Squamous carcinoma, Adc: Adenocarcinoma, Asc: Adenosquamous carcinoma, LN lymph node, Sur: Surgery, Che: chemotherapy, Rad: radiotherapy, NLR: neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, PLR: platelet lymphocyte ratio, CRP: C-reactive protein, WBC: white blood cell. CRP/Alb: C-reactive protein/Albumin ratio, mGPS: modified Glasgow prognostic score, PI: Prognostic index, PNI: Prognostic nutritional index, SCC-Ag: squamous cell carcinoma -related antigen, HR: hazard ratio, CI: confidence interval.
NLR, CRP/Alb and combined NLR+ CRP/Alb were adjusted separately in multivariable models. Results from the multivariable model which included combined NLR + CRP/Alb score are indicated in bold. The cut-off values for CRP/Alb, NLR and PLR were determined by the method described in statistic analysis. CRP, neutrophil count and SCC-Ag were categorized according to clinical normal reference range.
Fig 1Prognosis significance of NLR, CRP/Alb ratio in all cervical cancer and SCC subgroup. The 7-year OS rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the log-rank test. (a, d) OS based on NLR in all patients and SCC patient. (b, e) OS based on CRP/Alb ratio in all patients and SCC patient. (c, f) OS of combined NLR and CRP/Alb ratio-based categorisation in all patients and SCC patient.
Fig 2Correlation of serum NLR and CRP/Alb ratio in 229 patients with cervical cancer. The Pretreatment NLR was positive correlation with CRP/Alb ratio (r = 0.235, p < 0.001).
Associations of NLR and CRP/Alb ratio with clinicopathological factors of 198 patient with SCC
| Characteristic | NLR, n | CRP/Alb ratio, n | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 1.60 | > 1.60 | ≤ 0.022 | > 0.022 | |||
| 0.343 | < 0.001* | |||||
| < 44 | 31 | 49 | 43 | 37 | ||
| ≥ 44 | 38 | 80 | 33 | 85 | ||
| 0.699 | < 0.001* | |||||
| Ⅰ | 45 | 76 | 62 | 59 | ||
| Ⅱ | 21 | 45 | 14 | 52 | ||
| Ⅲand Ⅳ | 3 | 8 | 0 | 11 | ||
| 0.741 | 0.892 | |||||
| G1/G2 | 32 | 63 | 36 | 59 | ||
| G3 | 37 | 66 | 40 | 63 | ||
| 0.240 | 0.461 | |||||
| < 4 | 55 | 93 | 59 | 89 | ||
| ≥ 4 | 14 | 36 | 17 | 33 | ||
| 0.551 | 0.275 | |||||
| No | 57 | 102 | 64 | 95 | ||
| Yes | 12 | 27 | 12 | 27 | ||
| 0.030* | 0.027* | |||||
| Surgery alone | 19 | 20 | 21 | 18 | ||
| Surger and chemotherapy and(or) radiotherapy | 46 | 89 | 50 | 85 | ||
| Chemotherapy and(or) radiotherapy | 4 | 20 | 5 | 19 | ||
| 0.028* | < 0.001* | |||||
| ≤ 1.5 | 46 | 65 | 58 | 53 | ||
| >1.5 | 23 | 64 | 18 | 69 | ||
values were calculated by Chi-Square ( χ2 test) or Fisher's exact test, * p < 0.05 considered as statistically significant.
Abbreviations: FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, LN lymph node, NLR the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, CRP/Alb the C-reactive protein/Albumin ratio, SCC-Ag squamous cell carcinoma -related antigen.