Literature DB >> 32409927

A high Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) or modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) predicts poor prognosis in gynecologic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dan Nie1, Lingping Zhang2, Chunyan Wang3, Qian Guo3, Xiguang Mao3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Glasgow Prognostic Score or modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS/mGPS), a novel inflammatory indicator, which acts as a prognostic predictor in various cancers. However, these results are still controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the prognostic role of GPS/mGPS in patients with gynecologic cancers.
METHODS: We explored eligible studies by searching the databases PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted to investigate the correlation between GPS/mGPS and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additionally, we performed subgroup analyses to detect the potential heterogeneity in our study.
RESULTS: 11 studies involving 2830 patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that a high GPS was significantly related to a shorter OS (pooled HR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.54-2.43; P < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.56-2.35; P < 0.001) in patients with gynecologic cancers. Moreover, mGPS also predicted poor OS (pooled HR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.41-1.96; P < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.47-2.04; P < 0.001) in gynecologic cancers patients.
CONCLUSION: A higher GPS/mGPS is correlated with poor survival outcomes in patients with gynecologic cancers. Pretreatment GPS/mGPS is a valid prognostic predictor in gynecologic cancers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glasgow prognostic score; Gynecologic cancer; Modified Glasgow prognostic score; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32409927     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05581-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  37 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Dan Nie; Han Gong; Xiguang Mao; Zhengyu Li
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Ascites and malnutrition are predictive factors for incomplete cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer.

Authors:  Emmanuel I Benizri; Jean-Marc Bereder; Amine Rahili; Jean-Louis Bernard; Daniel Benchimol
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Nutrition, inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Federico Pietrocola; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 5.  Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and survival in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.294

6.  Malnutrition Identified by the Nutritional Risk Index and Poor Prognosis in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ga Won Yim; Kyung Jin Eoh; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.900

7.  An inflammation-based prognostic score (mGPS) predicts cancer survival independent of tumour site: a Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study.

Authors:  M J Proctor; D S Morrison; D Talwar; S M Balmer; D S J O'Reilly; A K Foulis; P G Horgan; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Preoperative prognostic nutritional index is a powerful predictor of prognosis in patients with stage III ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Bin Ye; Weijiang Liang; Yazhou Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L M Forrest; D C McMillan; C S McArdle; W J Angerson; D J Dunlop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma: A 22-Year Review of 35 Cases.

Authors:  Chien-Yu Hsueh; Ching-Fen Yang; Jyh-Pyng Gau; Edward C Kuan; Ching-Yin Ho; Tzeon-Jye Chiou; Liang-Tsai Hsiao; Ting-An Lin; Ming-Ying Lan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic and clinical significance of modified glasgow prognostic score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of 4,629 patients.

Authors:  Dongdong Wu; Xingmu Wang; Ge Shi; Honggang Sun; Guoxing Ge
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.682

2.  Inflammation and nutrition based screening tests for detection of infection in cases of rapid hip destruction.

Authors:  Koki Abe; Hyonmin Choe; Masatoshi Oba; Taro Tezuka; Hiroyuki Ike; Naomi Kobayashi; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Pretreatment Glasgow Prognostic Score Correlated with Serum Histidine Level and Three-Year Mortality of Patients with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Optimal Performance Status.

Authors:  Kun-Yun Yeh; Chao-Hung Wang; Hang Huong Ling; Chia-Lin Peng; Zih-Syuan Chen; Simon Hsia
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.706

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.