Literature DB >> 20697515

The predictive value of pre-treatment inflammatory markers in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

G Kasymjanova1, N MacDonald, J S Agulnik, V Cohen, C Pepe, H Kreisman, R Sharma, D Small.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging. Even within the same stage and treatment group, survival and response to treatment vary. We set out to determine the predictive value of inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells (WBCS) in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were assigned a prognostic index (PI): 0 for crp 10 mg/L or less and WBCS 11x10⁹/L or less, 1 if one of the two markers was elevated, and 2 if both markers were elevated. We then used chest computed tomography (CT) imaging to evaluate response after 2 cycles of chemotherapy treatment.
RESULTS: Of 134 patients, 46 had a PI of 0; 60, a PI of 1; and 28, a PI of 2. Disease progressed in 41 patients. Progression was significantly more frequent among patients with a PI of 2 (p = 0.008). Median survival was 20.0 months for the PI 0 group, 10.4 months for the PI 1 group, and 7.9 months for the PI 2 group (p < 0.001). The PI was the only significant prognostic factor for survival even after adjustment for performance status, smoking, and weight loss (hazard ratio: 1.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 2.14; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory state correlates significantly with both chemotherapy response and survival in stage IV NSCLC. The PI may provide additional guidance for therapeutic decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-small-cell lung cancer; crp; nsclc; predictive factors; prognostic factors; response; survival

Year:  2010        PMID: 20697515      PMCID: PMC2913830          DOI: 10.3747/co.v17i4.567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  50 in total

1.  Usefulness of the prognostic inflammatory and nutritional index (PINI) in hospitalized elderly patients.

Authors:  M Bonnefoy; L Ayzac; Y Ingenbleek; T Kostka; R C Boisson; J Bienvenu
Journal:  Int J Vitam Nutr Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.784

2.  Comments on: Haemostatic abnormalities in lung cancer: prognostic implications, Buccheri et al., Eur J Cancer, 33, pp. 50-55, 1997.

Authors:  J Watine
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Elevated serum levels of C-reactive protein are indicative of a poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  P Guillem; J P Triboulet
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Development and performance of a fully automated method for assay of C-reactive protein in the aca discrete clinical analyzer.

Authors:  M W Schwartz; R S Schifreen; E Gorman; P M Tuhy; J Bienvenu; D L Warkentin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  C-reactive protein: an activator of innate immunity and a modulator of adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Terry W Du Clos; Carolyn Mold
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 6.  Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress.

Authors:  Michael D Brundage; Diane Davies; William J Mackillop
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  A prospective longitudinal study of performance status, an inflammation-based score (GPS) and survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L M Forrest; D C McMillan; C S McArdle; W J Angerson; K Dagg; H R Scott
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The relationship between circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein, inflammatory cytokines and cytokine receptors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D J McKeown; D J F Brown; A Kelly; A M Wallace; D C McMillan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Comparison of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) with performance status (ECOG) in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L M Forrest; D C McMillan; C S McArdle; W J Angerson; D J Dunlop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L M Forrest; D C McMillan; C S McArdle; W J Angerson; D J Dunlop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  62 in total

1.  Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory responses in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Myong Kim; Kyung Chul Moon; Woo Suk Choi; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Tumour inflammatory response: adding fuel to the fire?

Authors:  M Valdes; M R Chasen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Prognostic value of inflammation-based markers in advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  J Zou; Q Li; F Kou; Y Zhu; M Lu; J Li; Z Lu; L Shen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Circulating Tumor Cells, Circulating Tumor DNA and Other Blood-based Prognostic Scores in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma - Mini-Review.

Authors:  Marian Liberko; Katarina Kolostova; Arpad Szabo; Robert Gurlich; Martin Oliverius; Renata Soumarova
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Comparison of Glasgow prognostic score and prognostic index in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Gui Jiang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Yu Lu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Comparison of the prognostic values of various inflammation based factors in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  De-shen Wang; Hui-yan Luo; Miao-zhen Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Dong-sheng Zhang; Feng-hua Wang; Yu-hong Li; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Cancer-related inflammation as predicting tool for treatment outcome in locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sonja Badovinac; Marta Korsic; Davorka Mursic; Miroslav Samarzija; Branka Cucevic; Mihovil Roglic; Marko Jakopovic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Rehabilitation for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Martin Chasen; Ravi Bhargava; Neil MacDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Serum C-reactive protein predicts poor prognosis in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Y C Zeng; R Wu; Y P Xiao; F Chi; M Xue; Z Y Zhang; R Xing; W Z Zhong; S L Wang; X Tian; W Chen; J J Chen; L N Wu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Glasgow prognostic score predicts therapeutic outcome after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroaki Shiba; Takashi Horiuchi; Taro Sakamoto; Kenei Furukawa; Yoshihiro Shirai; Tomonori Iida; Yuki Fujiwara; Koichiro Haruki; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.