Literature DB >> 17964182

The serum assay of tumour markers in the prognostic evaluation, treatment monitoring and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer: a review of the literature.

Angiolo Gadducci1, Roberta Tana, Stefania Cosio, Andrea Riccardo Genazzani.   

Abstract

Pre-treatment serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen [SCC] levels are elevated in 28-88% of patients with squamous cell cervical cancer, and are related to tumour stage, tumour size, depth of stromal invasion, lymph-vascular space status, parametrial involvement and lymph node status. The clinical relevance of pre-treatment serum SCC assay is still debated. Some authors reported that it has no prognostic value, some others found that it is related to survival at univariate analysis, and some others detected that is an independent prognostic variable for survival. Serial SCC measurements reflect both the tumour response to treatment and the clinical outcome of patients. Increasing SCC levels can precede the clinical diagnosis of recurrent disease in 46-92% of the cases, with a mean lead time ranging from 2 to 8 months. According to some authors serum SCC assay during the follow-up does not improve the cure rate of patients who will ultimately develop a recurrence. However, it has been recently reported that the performance of a positron emission tomography [PET] in patients with asymptomatic SCC elevation can sometimes allow an earlier diagnosis of relapse with a survival benefit. SCC is a more sensitive serum tumour marker than CYFRA 21-1 for squamous cell cervical cancer in most series. Pre-treatment CA 125 levels are raised in 20-75% of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma, and reflect tumour stage, tumour size, histological grade, cervical stromal invasion, lymph-vascular space status and lymph node status. Elevated serum CA 125 has been also detected in patients with squamous cell cervical cancer, but with a positivity rate lower than that found in patients with cervical adenocarcinoma. Pre-treatment CA 125 levels appear to have a prognostic value, and rising serum CA 125 during follow-up may precede or be coincident with the clinical diagnosis of recurrent cervical adenocarcinoma. Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] are often elevated in patients with cervical cancer, and decrease significantly after successful treatment. However, the clinical relevance of serum VEGF assay is still investigational.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17964182     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  46 in total

1.  Detection of serum tumor markers in multiple myeloma using the CLINPROT system.

Authors:  Aili He; Ju Bai; Chen Huang; Juan Yang; Wanggang Zhang; Jianli Wang; Yun Yang; Pengyu Zhang; Fuling Zhou
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Pathologic findings following false-positive screening tests for ovarian cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Sarah J Nyante; Amanda Black; Aimée R Kreimer; Máire A Duggan; J Daniel Carreon; Bruce Kessel; Saundra S Buys; Lawrence R Ragard; Karen A Johnson; Barbara K Dunn; Lois Lamerato; John M Commins; Christine D Berg; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  LTPB2 acts as a prognostic factor and promotes progression of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan Ren; Huan Lu; Danmei Zhao; Yangjun Ou; Kang Yu; Jiandong Gu; Li Wang; Shuheng Jiang; Mo Chen; Jinghao Wang; Rong Zhang; Congjian Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer with MR Imaging Importance of Serum HE4 and CA 125 Levels in the Extent of Disease at Evaluation.

Authors:  Emsal Pınar Topdağı Yılmaz; Yakup Kumtepe
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-10

5.  Tumor size and lymph node status determined by imaging are reliable factors for predicting advanced cervical cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Min Sun Kyung; Hong Bae Kim; Jung Yeob Seoung; In Young Choi; Young Soo Joo; Me Yeon Lee; Jung Bae Kang; Young Han Park
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Preoperative D-dimers as an independent prognostic marker in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Yao-Ling Luo; Pei-Dong Chi; Xin Zheng; Lin Zhang; Xue-Ping Wang; Hao Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-14

7.  Clinical value of serum HMGB1 levels in early detection of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix: comparison with serum SCCA, CYFRA21-1, and CEA levels.

Authors:  Xiugui Sheng; Xuelian Du; Xiaoling Zhang; Dapeng Li; Chunhua Lu; Qinshui Li; Zhifang Ma; Quqing Song; Cong Wang
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Squamous cell carcinoma antigen 1 and 2 expression in cultured normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Magdalena Chechlinska; Magdalena Kowalewska; Edyta Brzoska-Wojtowicz; Jakub Radziszewski; Konrad Ptaszynski; Janusz Rys; Janina Kaminska; Radoslawa Nowak
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-07-01

9.  Serum vascular endothelial growth factor: a prognostic factor in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Petra L M Zusterzeel; Paul N Span; Marja G K Dijksterhuis; Chris M G Thomas; Fred C G J Sweep; Leon F A G Massuger
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Analytical assessment of the novel Maglumi squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) immunoluminometric assay.

Authors:  Mariella Dipalo; Cecilia Gnocchi; Rosalia Aloe; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.