Literature DB >> 27072518

Reference point indentation is insufficient for detecting alterations in traditional mechanical properties of bone under common experimental conditions.

John B Krege1, Mohammad W Aref1, Erin McNerny1, Joseph M Wallace2, Jason M Organ1, Matthew R Allen3.   

Abstract

Reference point indentation (RPI) was developed as a novel method to assess mechanical properties of bone in vivo, yet it remains unclear what aspects of bone dictate changes/differences in RPI-based parameters. The main RPI parameter, indentation distance increase (IDI), has been proposed to be inversely related to the ability of bone to form/tolerate damage. The goal of this work was to explore the relationshipre-intervention RPI measurebetween RPI parameters and traditional mechanical properties under varying experimental conditions (drying and ashing bones to increase brittleness, demineralizing bones and soaking in raloxifene to decrease brittleness). Beams were machined from cadaveric bone, pre-tested with RPI, subjected to experimental manipulation, post-tested with RPI, and then subjected to four-point bending to failure. Drying and ashing significantly reduced RPI's IDI, as well as ultimate load (UL), and energy absorption measured from bending tests. Demineralization increased IDI with minimal change to bending properties. Ex vivo soaking in raloxifene had no effect on IDI but tended to enhance post-yield behavior at the structural level. These data challenge the paradigm of an inverse relationship between IDI and bone toughness, both through correlation analyses and in the individual experiments where divergent patterns of altered IDI and mechanical properties were noted. Based on these results, we conclude that RPI measurements alone, as compared to bending tests, are insufficient to reach conclusions regarding mechanical properties of bone. This proves problematic for the potential clinical use of RPI measurements in determining fracture risk for a single patient, as it is not currently clear that there is an IDI, or even a trend of IDI, that can determine clinically relevant changes in tissue properties that may contribute to whole bone fracture resistance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bending; Biodent; Material properties; Toughness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27072518      PMCID: PMC4862890          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  24 in total

1.  Fracture toughness of compact bone.

Authors:  W Bonfield; P K Datta
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  In vivo reference point indentation measurement variability in skeletally mature inbred mice.

Authors:  Andrew Srisuwananukorn; Matthew R Allen; Drew M Brown; Joseph M Wallace; Jason M Organ
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-06-17

3.  Towards a standardized reference point indentation testing procedure.

Authors:  Alexander Setters; Iwona Jasiuk
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-01-27

4.  Nano-structural, compositional and micro-architectural signs of cortical bone fragility at the superolateral femoral neck in elderly hip fracture patients vs. healthy aged controls.

Authors:  Petar Milovanovic; Zlatko Rakocevic; Danijela Djonic; Vladimir Zivkovic; Michael Hahn; Slobodan Nikolic; Michael Amling; Bjoern Busse; Marija Djuric
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.032

Review 5.  Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial.

Authors:  C H Turner; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Reference-point indentation correlates with bone toughness assessed using whole-bone traditional mechanical testing.

Authors:  Maxime A Gallant; Drew M Brown; Jason M Organ; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Insights into reference point indentation involving human cortical bone: sensitivity to tissue anisotropy and mechanical behavior.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Aurélie Coulmier; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Jennifer A Gaddy; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2014-05-27

8.  Comparison of cyclic and impact-based reference point indentation measurements in human cadaveric tibia.

Authors:  Lamya Karim; Miranda Van Vliet; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Toughness and damage susceptibility in human cortical bone is proportional to mechanical inhomogeneity at the osteonal-level.

Authors:  Orestis L Katsamenis; Thomas Jenkins; Philipp J Thurner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Reference point indentation is not indicative of whole mouse bone measures of stress intensity fracture toughness.

Authors:  Alessandra Carriero; Jan L Bruse; Karla J Oldknow; José Luis Millán; Colin Farquharson; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Determination of Elastic Modulus in Mouse Bones Using a Nondestructive Micro-Indentation Technique Using Reference Point Indentation.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Identifying Bone Matrix Impairments in a Mouse Model of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) by Clinically Translatable Techniques.

Authors:  Rafay Ahmed; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Shrey Derasari; Joshua Meyer; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Florent Elefteriou; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 6.390

4.  Differences in sensitivity to microstructure between cyclic- and impact-based microindentation of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Mary Kate Manhard; Mark D Does; Daniel S Perrien; Donald H Lee; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  Mechanical Characterization of Bone: State of the Art in Experimental Approaches-What Types of Experiments Do People Do and How Does One Interpret the Results?

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Immersion in Raloxifene does not significantly improve bone toughness or screw pull-out strength in multiple in vitro models.

Authors:  Michael R Eby; Danielle M Cristino; Matthew Counihan; Kendall M Masada; Jaimo Ahn; Michael W Hast
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Effects of combination treatment with alendronate and raloxifene on skeletal properties in a beagle dog model.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; Erin McNerny; Mohammad Aref; Jason M Organ; Christopher L Newman; Brian McGowan; Tim Jang; David B Burr; Drew M Brown; Max Hammond; Paul R Territo; Chen Lin; Scott Persohn; Lei Jiang; Amanda A Riley; Brian P McCarthy; Gary D Hutchins; Joseph M Wallace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Microindentation - a tool for measuring cortical bone stiffness? A systematic review.

Authors:  M Arnold; S Zhao; S Ma; F Giuliani; U Hansen; J P Cobb; R L Abel; O Boughton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 9.  The challenges of diagnosing osteoporosis and the limitations of currently available tools.

Authors:  Palak Choksi; Karl J Jepsen; Gregory A Clines
Journal:  Clin Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2018-05-29

Review 10.  In Vivo Assessment of Cortical Bone Fragility.

Authors:  Lyn Bowman; Anne B Loucks
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.