Literature DB >> 25862290

Comparison of cyclic and impact-based reference point indentation measurements in human cadaveric tibia.

Lamya Karim1, Miranda Van Vliet2, Mary L Bouxsein3.   

Abstract

Although low bone mineral density (BMD) is strongly associated with increased fracture risk, up to 50% of those who suffer fractures are not detected as high-risk patients by BMD testing. Thus, new approaches may improve identification of those at increased risk for fracture by in vivo assessment of altered bone tissue properties, which may contribute to skeletal fragility. Recently developed reference point indentation (RPI) allows for assessment of cortical bone indentation properties in vivo using devices that apply cyclic loading or impact loading, but there is little information available to assist with interpretation of RPI measurements. Our goals were to use human cadaveric tibia to determine: 1) the associations between RPI variables, cortical bone density, and morphology; 2) the association between variables obtained from RPI systems using cyclic, slow loading versus a single impact load; and 3) age-related differences in RPI variables. We obtained 20 human tibia and femur pairs from female donors (53-97years), measured total hip BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, assessed tibial cortical microarchitecture using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), and assessed cortical bone indentation properties at the mid-tibial diaphysis using both the cyclic and impact-based RPI systems (Biodent and Osteoprobe, respectively, Active Life Scientific, Santa Barbara, CA). We found a few weak associations between RPI variables, BMD, and cortical geometry; a few weak associations between measurements obtained by the two RPI systems; and no age-related differences in RPI variables. Our findings indicate that in cadaveric tibia from older women RPI measurements are largely independent of age, femoral BMD, and cortical geometry. Furthermore, measurements from the cyclic and impact loading RPI devices are weakly related to each other, indicating that each device reflects different aspects of cortical bone indentation properties.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Bone; Indentation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25862290     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  14 in total

1.  Increasing fluoride content deteriorates rat bone mechanical properties.

Authors:  Taraneh Rezaee; Mary L Bouxsein; Lamya Karim
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Bone microarchitecture, biomechanical properties, and advanced glycation end-products in the proximal femur of adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Lamya Karim; Julia Moulton; Miranda Van Vliet; Kelsey Velie; Ann Robbins; Fatemeh Malekipour; Ayesha Abdeen; Douglas Ayres; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Determination of Elastic Modulus in Mouse Bones Using a Nondestructive Micro-Indentation Technique Using Reference Point Indentation.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  The Effect of Type 2 Diabetes on Bone Biomechanics.

Authors:  Lamya Karim; Taraneh Rezaee; Rachana Vaidya
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Bone quality assessment techniques: geometric, compositional, and mechanical characterization from macroscale to nanoscale.

Authors:  Heather B Hunt; Eve Donnelly
Journal:  Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-08-22

7.  Microstructural and compositional contributions towards the mechanical behavior of aging human bone measured by cyclic and impact reference point indentation.

Authors:  Adam C Abraham; Avinesh Agarwalla; Aditya Yadavalli; Jenny Y Liu; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Mathilde Granke; Robert C Singleton; George M Pharr
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  True Gold or Pyrite: A Review of Reference Point Indentation for Assessing Bone Mechanical Properties In Vivo.

Authors:  Matthew R Allen; Erin Mb McNerny; Jason M Organ; Joseph M Wallace
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Differences in sensitivity to microstructure between cyclic- and impact-based microindentation of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Mary Kate Manhard; Mark D Does; Daniel S Perrien; Donald H Lee; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.