Literature DB >> 25205005

Combining item response theory and diagnostic classification models: a psychometric model for scaling ability and diagnosing misconceptions.

Laine Bradshaw1, Jonathan Templin.   

Abstract

Traditional testing procedures typically utilize unidimensional item response theory (IRT) models to provide a single, continuous estimate of a student's overall ability. Advances in psychometrics have focused on measuring multiple dimensions of ability to provide more detailed feedback for students, teachers, and other stakeholders. Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) provide multidimensional feedback by using categorical latent variables that represent distinct skills underlying a test that students may or may not have mastered. The Scaling Individuals and Classifying Misconceptions (SICM) model is presented as a combination of a unidimensional IRT model and a DCM where the categorical latent variables represent misconceptions instead of skills. In addition to an estimate of ability along a latent continuum, the SICM model provides multidimensional, diagnostic feedback in the form of statistical estimates of probabilities that students have certain misconceptions. Through an empirical data analysis, we show how this additional feedback can be used by stakeholders to tailor instruction for students' needs. We also provide results from a simulation study that demonstrate that the SICM MCMC estimation algorithm yields reasonably accurate estimates under large-scale testing conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25205005     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9350-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  4 in total

1.  Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models.

Authors:  Jonathan L Templin; Robert A Henson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-09

2.  A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.

Authors:  Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Reporting subscores for institutions.

Authors:  Shelby Haberman; Sandip Sinharay; Gautam Puhan
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach by P. de Boeck and M. Wilson and Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models by A. Skrondal and S. Rabe-Hesketh.

Authors:  Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.500

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Markov Decision Process Measurement Model.

Authors:  Michelle M LaMar
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  A Family of Generalized Diagnostic Classification Models for Multiple Choice Option-Based Scoring.

Authors:  Louis V DiBello; Robert A Henson; William F Stout
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-12-10

3.  A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Identifying Coexisting Skills and Misconceptions.

Authors:  Bor-Chen Kuo; Chun-Hua Chen; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-10-07

4.  Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables.

Authors:  Hyokyoung Hong; Chun Wang; Youn Seon Lim; Jeff Douglas
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-04-14

5.  A Mixture Proportional Hazards Model With Random Effects for Response Times in Tests.

Authors:  Jochen Ranger; Jörg-Tobias Kuhn
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.

Authors:  Matthew J Madison; Laine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.

Authors:  Ren Liu; Anne Corinne Huggins-Manley; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.

Authors:  Jonathan Templin; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Flexible Computerized Adaptive Tests to Detect Misconceptions and Estimate Ability Simultaneously.

Authors:  Yu Bao; Yawei Shen; Shiyu Wang; Laine Bradshaw
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-11-06

10.  Integrating Differential Evolution Optimization to Cognitive Diagnostic Model Estimation.

Authors:  Zhehan Jiang; Wenchao Ma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.