Literature DB >> 2358414

Basilar membrane nonlinearity determines auditory nerve rate-intensity functions and cochlear dynamic range.

G K Yates1, I M Winter, D Robertson.   

Abstract

In a previous paper (Winter et al., 1990) we demonstrated the existence of a new type of auditory-nerve rate-intensity function, the straight type, as well as a correlation between rate-level type, threshold and spontaneous rate. In this paper we now show that the variation in rate-intensity functions has its origin in the basilar membrane nonlinearity. Comparison of rate-intensity functions at characteristic frequency and at a tail-frequency show that the rate-intensity functions are identical at low firing rates and that the sloping-saturation and straight types deviate from the standard function only at higher firing rates. The frequencies at which the deviations occur, and the change from saturating to sloping-saturation or straight, are closely correlated with the characteristic frequency of the fibre. Using the tail-frequency rate-intensity function as a calibration, it is possible to derive the basilar membrane input-output function at characteristic frequency from the characteristic frequency rate-intensity function. The resulting derived basilar membrane input-output functions are of a simple form and agree well with published direct measurements of basilar membrane motion. They show that the wide dynamic range to which the cochlea responds, about 120 decibels, is compressed by the basilar membrane nonlinearity into a much smaller range of about 30-35 decibels. General characteristics of the derived basilar membrane input-output curves show features which agree well with psychoacoustic studies of loudness estimation.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2358414     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90121-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  37 in total

1.  Coding of sound pressure level in the barn owl's auditory nerve.

Authors:  C Köppl; G Yates
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint.

Authors:  G A Manley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

6.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

7.  Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; John C Ellison; Denis Fitzpatrick; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech.

Authors:  Eric D Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Tone and call responses of units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.