| Literature DB >> 29780158 |
Yang Li1, Hong Cai1, Hua Tian1, Ke Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the level of concern and expectations of patients and their families of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), peri-operative procedures, postoperative rehabilitation, and outcome in a Chinese population. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study recruited 133 patients with osteoarthritis, scheduled to undergo primary elective TKA. Before surgery, the surgeon completed the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score questionnaire on pain, function, range of motion (ROM), and muscle strength. There were 128 patients and 127 family members (spouses, sons, or daughters) who completed the 24-item Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire on pain, stiffness, and physical function, and also a 61-item questionnaire that included direct questions on their concerns and expectations on TKA and its outcome, using scores of: 1, not concerned; 2, somewhat concerned; 3, very concerned; and 4, extremely concerned. RESULTS The five greatest pre-operative concerns for patients included the degree of postoperative mobility; the experience and expertise of their surgeon; the risk of failure of TKA; the duration of the joint implant; and their expected degree of postoperative independence. Scores for Chinese patients indicated a higher level of concern compared with Western patients. Family members were significantly more concerned than patients regarding the postoperative restoration of knee function and alleviation of pain (p=0.001), the ability to squat (p=0.049) and to kneel (p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS Communicating pre-operative information on TKA might result in realistic expectations for patients and their families, alleviate concerns, and improve relationships between doctors and patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29780158 PMCID: PMC5989625 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.909805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Mean level of concern among patients before total knee arthroplasty.
| Rank | Concern | Mean | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ability to walk as much as possible | 3.79 | 0.57 |
| 2 | Surgeon’s experience | 3.73 | 0.70 |
| 3 | Failure risk of surgery | 3.69 | 0.83 |
| 4 | Lifespan of the implant | 3.64 | 0.70 |
| 5 | Ability to take care of oneself | 3.61 | 0.70 |
| 6 | Anesthesiologist’s experience | 3.60 | 0.68 |
| 7 | Infections after surgery | 3.60 | 0.82 |
| 8 | Stiffness in joint after surgery | 3.59 | 0.86 |
| 9 | Risk of dislocation of the new joint | 3.58 | 0.88 |
| 10 | Risk of anesthesia | 3.58 | 0.84 |
| 11 | Pain after discharge from the hospital | 3.57 | 0.77 |
| 12 | Thrombus after surgery | 3.55 | 0.86 |
| 13 | Rejection reaction from joint materials | 3.55 | 0.87 |
| 14 | Risk of getting AIDS from a transfusion | 3.52 | 0.95 |
| 15 | Risk of getting hepatitis from a transfusion | 3.48 | 0.91 |
| 16 | Bone fracture around the new joint | 3.48 | 0.89 |
| 17 | Need to use crutches permanently | 3.46 | 0.89 |
| 18 | Chance surgery will not alleviate pain | 3.43 | 0.82 |
| 19 | Heart problems during surgery | 3.43 | 0.98 |
| 20 | Ability to go up and down stairs | 3.43 | 0.95 |
| 21 | Heart problems after surgery | 3.42 | 0.96 |
| 22 | Surgeon used the implant material I chose | 3.41 | 0.98 |
| 23 | Need to have the surgery again | 3.40 | 1.03 |
| 24 | Nursing care | 3.39 | 0.89 |
| 25 | Pain after surgery | 3.40 | 0.87 |
| 26 | Pain during surgery | 3.39 | 0.86 |
| 27 | Deformity caused by lack of rehabilitation due to pain | 3.37 | 0.89 |
| 28 | Pain during rehabilitation after surgery | 3.30 | 0.97 |
| 29 | Risk of amputation | 3.30 | 1.15 |
| 30 | Ability to get dressed and put on shoes | 3.30 | 0.97 |
| 31 | Uneven length of legs after surgery | 3.23 | 1.11 |
| 32 | Length of recovery time | 3.23 | 0.87 |
| 33 | Families’ company during hospital stay | 3.23 | 1.10 |
| 34 | Ability to squat | 3.22 | 0.91 |
| 35 | Nerve problems after surgery | 3.20 | 1.06 |
| 36 | Risk of dying | 3.18 | 1.21 |
| 37 | Operation performed on the correct side | 3.10 | 1.29 |
| 38 | Cleanliness of hospital facilities | 3.10 | 1.06 |
| 39 | Sleep quality in the hospital | 3.09 | 0.97 |
| 40 | Need for blood transfusion | 3.02 | 1.02 |
| 41 | Operating room quality | 2.95 | 1.15 |
| 42 | Physical therapy provided after surgery | 2.91 | 1.21 |
| 43 | Surgeon too young | 2.90 | 1.00 |
| 44 | Length of surgery | 2.90 | 1.07 |
| 45 | Hospitalization expenses more than expected | 2.89 | 1.28 |
| 46 | Hearing operating noises during surgery | 2.80 | 1.25 |
| 47 | Surgeon too old | 2.77 | 1.12 |
| 48 | Ability to pay all bills | 2.74 | 1.26 |
| 49 | Ability to return to recreational activities | 2.73 | 1.13 |
| 50 | Hospital food | 2.66 | 1.01 |
| 51 | Ability to ride a bike | 2.62 | 1.27 |
| 52 | Possibility of long hospital stay | 2.61 | 1.21 |
| 53 | Ability to go back to work | 2.59 | 1.25 |
| 54 | Ability to sit with legs crossed | 2.59 | 1.15 |
| 55 | Ability to kneel | 2.55 | 1.17 |
| 56 | Scar problems | 2.41 | 1.10 |
| 57 | Ability to take care of children | 2.40 | 1.25 |
| 58 | Possibility of short hospital stay | 2.39 | 1.24 |
| 59 | Ability to lift heavy objects | 2.31 | 1.22 |
| 60 | Ability to resume sexual activity | 1.64 | 1.08 |
| 61 | Ability to drive a car | 1.50 | 0.99 |
The four concerns that were significantly greater among women.
| Concern | Women | Men | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery will not alleviate pain | 3.56 | 2.98 | 0.005 |
| Ability to take care of myself | 3.73 | 3.12 | 0.019 |
| Ability to go back to work | 2.65 | 2.01 | 0.030 |
| Pain after surgery | 3.47 | 3.07 | 0.048 |
The five concerns that were significantly greater among older patients.
| Concern | Age <65y | Age ≥65 y | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ability to take care of children | 2.94 | 1.89 | <0.001 |
| Ability to recreational activities | 3.09 | 2.41 | 0.001 |
| Lifespan of the implant | 3.84 | 3.47 | 0.004 |
| Ability to ride a bike | 2.97 | 2.32 | 0.006 |
| Ability to lift heavy objects | 2.58 | 2.07 | 0.024 |
Comparison of the top five issues of concern between the current and previous studies.
| Rank | Moran et al. [ | Trousdale et al. [ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item of concern | Concern level | Item of concern | Concern level | |
| 1 | Cancellation of surgery | 2.66 | Ability to walk as much as possible | 2.08 |
| 2 | No decrease in pain | 2.60 | Ability to go up and down stairs | 2.04 |
| 3 | Risk of amputation | 2.46 | Pain immediately after surgery | 2.03 |
| 4 | Risk of joint infection | Unavailable | Length of recovery | 2.03 |
| 5 | Risk of dying | 2.31 | Risk of getting AIDS from a transfusion | 1.99 |
| 1 | Pain after surgery | 3.21 | Ability to walk as much as possible | 3.79 |
| 2 | Pain after discharge from hospital | 2.92 | Surgeon’s experience | 3.73 |
| 3 | Chance surgery will not alleviate pain | 2.78 | Failure risk of the surgery | 3.69 |
| 4 | Pain during surgery | 2.78 | Lifespan of the implant | 3.64 |
| 5 | Risk of getting AIDS from a transfusion | 2.69 | Ability to care for oneself | 3.61 |
Range of scores: 1 – not concerned; 2 – somewhat concerned; 3 – very concerned; 4 – extremely concerned.