Literature DB >> 8113282

Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement.

J G Wright1, S Rudicel, A R Feinstein.   

Abstract

We aimed to assess individual differences in complaints in patients just before total hip replacement (THR) and the importance attached to the relief of each of them. In a pilot study, using open-ended interviews, we identified 16 main complaints, four of which (night pain, unequal leg length and discomfort during sexual and recreational activities) were not included in any of the six hip-rating scales in general use. Each of the 16 complaints was then assessed in 72 patients and rated for severity and the relative importance of relief. From this we calculated a severity-importance rating for each complaint and a patient-specific score for all complaints. The 72 patients had a mean age of 64 years (17 to 92) and 51% were men. The most important reasons for wanting a THR were day pain and walking difficulty, but the complaints mentioned above and not included in standard hip scores were also important. Greater attention to the individual requirements of patients might improve evaluation of the outcome of orthopaedic treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8113282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  26 in total

1.  Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure.

Authors:  William B Mortenson; William C Miller; Jan Miller-Pogar
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2007-09

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcomes following a physiotherapy rehabilitation programme for atraumatic posterior shoulder subluxation.

Authors:  James Blacknall; Ann Mackie; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-02-06

Review 3.  [Objectifying results in total knee arthroplasty: Is "patient satisfaction" adequate].

Authors:  C Kopkow; J Schmitt; E Haase; T Lange; K-P Günther; J Lützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

5.  [Health status and health-related quality of life. A facet in the evaluation of outcomes in orthopaedic surgery].

Authors:  A Roposch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; R Morris; S Hajat; B Reeves; D W Murray; D Hannen; M Rigge; O Williams; P Gregg
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

7.  No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups.

Authors:  Kristian Bjørgul; Wendy M Novicoff; S T Andersen; K Brevig; F Thu; M Wiig; O Ahlund
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-03

8.  Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Physical activity level improves after periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Benton Heyworth; Kerri Murray; Victor M Johnson; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  L M Olley; A J Carr
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.