Literature DB >> 18757956

Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement.

V Wylde1, I Learmonth, A Potter, K Bettinson, E Lingard.   

Abstract

We compared patient-reported outcomes of the Kinemax fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to the fixed- or the mobile-bearing prosthesis via a sealed envelope method after the bone cuts had been made in the operating theatre. Randomisation was stratified by centre and diagnosis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at eight to 12 weeks, one year and two years post-operatively. Validated questionnaires were used which included the Western Ontario MacMasters University, Short-Form 12, Mental Health Index-5, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Knee-Related Quality of Life and Function in Sport and Recreation scales and a validated scale of satisfaction post-operatively. In total, 242 patients (250 knees) with a mean age of 68 years (40 to 80) were recruited from four NHS orthopaedic centres. Of these, 132 patients (54.5%) were women. No statistically significant differences could be identified in any of the patient-reported outcome scores between patients who received the fixed-bearing or the mobile-bearing knee up to two-years post-operatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757956     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.21031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  47 in total

1.  Meeting patient expectations and ensuring satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

2.  Development of a new Knee Society scoring system.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Giles R Scuderi; Adam C Brekke; Alla Sikorskii; James B Benjamin; Jess H Lonner; Priya Chadha; Daniel A Daylamani; W Norman Scott; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The John Insall Award: no functional advantage of a mobile bearing posterior stabilized TKA.

Authors:  Ormonde M Mahoney; Tracy L Kinsey; Theresa J D'Errico; Jianhua Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Farshid Ejtehadi; Rachel Nichols; Leigh Davies; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Birgit Hanusch; Thai Nurn Lou; Gary Warriner; Anthony Hui; Paul Gregg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The Rotaglide+ total knee replacement: a comparison of mobile versus fixed bearings.

Authors:  Lorcan McGonagle; Louisa Bethell; Natalie Byrne; Ben G Bolton-Maggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no difference between cemented and hybrid implantation.

Authors:  Michael Iosifidis; Efthymios Iliopoulos; Dimos Neofytou; Nikolaos Sakorafas; Dimitrios Andreou; Dimitrios Alvanos; Anastasios Kyriakidis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  No difference in clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty between patellar eversion and non-eversion.

Authors:  Zhiwei Jia; Chun Chen; Yaohong Wu; Fan Ding; Xu Tian; Wei Li; Deli Wang; Qing He; Dike Ruan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  TKA revision - reasons, challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Heiko Graichen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.