Literature DB >> 29437057

Three groups of dissatisfied patients exist after total knee arthroplasty: early, persistent, and late.

N D Clement1, M Bardgett1, D Weir1, J Holland1, C Gerrand1, D J Deehan1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The primary aim of this study was to assess whether patient satisfaction one year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) changed with longer follow-up. The secondary aims were to identify predictors of satisfaction at one year, persistence of patient dissatisfaction, and late onset dissatisfaction in patients that were originally satisfied at one year. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort consisting of 1369 patients undergoing a primary TKA for osteoarthritis that had not undergone revision were identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and Short Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire scores were collected preoperatively, and one and five years postoperatively. In addition, patient satisfaction was assessed at one and five years postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of satisfaction at one and five years.
RESULTS: The overall rate of satisfaction did not change from one (91.7%, n = 1255) to five (90.1%, n = 1234) years (p = 0.16). Approximately half (n = 53/114) of the patients who were dissatisfied at one year became satisfied with their TKA at five years, whereas 6% (n = 74/1255) of those who were satisfied at one year became dissatisfied at five years. At one year, patients with lung disease (p = 0.04), with depression (p = 0.001), with back pain (p < 0.001), undergoing unilateral TKA (p = 0.001), or with a worse preoperative WOMAC pain score (p = 0.04) were more likely to be dissatisfied. Patients with gastric ulceration (p = 0.04) and a worse WOMAC stiffness score (p = 0.047) were at increased risk of persistent dissatisfaction at five years. In contrast, a worse WOMAC pain score (p = 0.01) at one year was a predictor of dissatisfaction in previously satisfied patients at five years.
CONCLUSION: Three groups of dissatisfied patients exist after TKA: 'early' dissatisfaction at one year, 'persistent' dissatisfaction with longer follow-up, and 'late' dissatisfaction developing in previously satisfied patients at one year. All three groups have different independent predictors of satisfaction, and potentially addressing risk factors specific to these groups may improve patient outcome and their satisfaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:161-9. ©2018 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome; Patient dissatisfaction; Patient satisfaction; Predictor; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29437057     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B2.BJJ-2017-1016.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  11 in total

1.  Incidental findings detected on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements: clinical importance and the effect on the scheduled arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gary Tran; Lafi S Khalil; Allen Wrubel; Chad L Klochko; Jason J Davis; Steven B Soliman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?

Authors:  Nicholas D Clement; Michelle Bardgett; David Weir; James Holland; Craig Gerrand; David J Deehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A prospective randomised controlled trial of mechanical axis with soft tissue release balancing vs functional alignment with bony resection balancing in total knee replacement-a study using Stryker Mako robotic arm-assisted technology.

Authors:  Simon W Young; Nina Zeng; Mei Lin Tay; David Fulker; Christina Esposito; Matthew Carter; Ali Bayan; Bill Farrington; Rupert Van Rooyen; Matthew Walker
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.728

4.  Clinical effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing and selective resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational evidence.

Authors:  Michal Grela; Matthew Barrett; Setor K Kunutsor; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse; Gulraj S Matharu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Sex does not clinically influence the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty but females have a lower rate of satisfaction with pain relief.

Authors:  N D Clement; D Weir; J Holland; D J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2020-06-17

6.  Validation of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Function Subscales for Use in Total Hip Replacement and Total Knee Replacement Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Susan M Goodman; Bella Y Mehta; Lisa A Mandl; Jackie D Szymonifka; Jackie Finik; Mark P Figgie; Iris Y Navarro-Millán; Mathias P Bostrom; Michael L Parks; Douglas E Padgett; Alexander S McLawhorn; Vinicius C Antao; Adolph J Yates; Bryan D Springer; Stephen L Lyman; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The Impact of Medical Comorbidities on Patient Satisfaction in Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Amarbir S Gill; Joshua Hwang; Angela M Beliveau; Jeremiah A Alt; Edward Bradley Strong; Machelle D Wilson; Toby O Steele
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Total knee arthroplasty using modified measured resection: a five-year retrospective review of midterm outcomes.

Authors:  Tran T Dung; Vo S Q Nang; Dinh N Son; Hoang G Du; Nguyen H Long; Le M Son; Duong D Toan; Do V Minh; Nguyen H Phuong; Ma N Thanh
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Concerns and Expectations of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty in China.

Authors:  Yang Li; Hong Cai; Hua Tian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-21

10.  The Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Comorbid Back Pain in Shoulder Instability: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kevin J Cronin; Brian R Wolf; Justin A Magnuson; Cale A Jacobs; Shannon Ortiz; Julie Y Bishop; Matthew J Bollier; Keith M Baumgarten; Jonathan T Bravman; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Brian T Feeley; John A Grant; Grant L Jones; John E Kuhn; C Benjamin Ma; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Bruce S Miller; Adam J Seidl; Matthew V Smith; Rick W Wright; Alan L Zhang; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.