Literature DB >> 12728419

Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure?

Andrew L Miner1, Elizabeth A Lingard, Elizabeth A Wright, Clement B Sledge, Jeffrey N Katz.   

Abstract

We investigated the relationship of knee range of motion (ROM) and function in a prospective, observational study of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Preoperative and 12-month data were collected on 684 patients, including knee ROM, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function questionnaire scores, patient satisfaction, and perceived improvement in quality of life (QOL). Only modest correlations were found between knee ROM and WOMAC function (r<0.34). At 12 months we found significantly worse WOMAC function scores for patients with <95 degrees flexion compared with patients with > or =95 degrees (mean, 61.9 vs 75.0; P<.0001). In linear regression models, WOMAC pain and function scores at 12 months were both correlates of patient satisfaction and perceived improvement in QOL (standardized beta>3.5; P<.0001), but knee flexion was not. For assessment of these outcomes, WOMAC function appears to be more important than knee flexion. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12728419     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  66 in total

1.  [Total knee replacement with ceramic femoral components: a national prospective multicenter study of clinical and radiological outcomes].

Authors:  P Bergschmidt; C Lohmann; D Ganzer; R Bader; S Finze; G Kundt; C Hauzeur; C Lukas; W Rüther; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Meeting patient expectations and ensuring satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

3.  A comparison of patient-reported and measured range of motion in a cohort of total knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Jamie E Collins; Benjamin N Rome; Meghan E Daigle; Vladislav Lerner; Jeffrey N Katz; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The John Insall Award: no functional advantage of a mobile bearing posterior stabilized TKA.

Authors:  Ormonde M Mahoney; Tracy L Kinsey; Theresa J D'Errico; Jianhua Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study.

Authors:  Justine M Naylor; Victoria Ko; Sam Adie; Clive Gaskin; Richard Walker; Ian A Harris; Rajat Mittal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope.

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; E A Lingard; D J Weir; D J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Modelling knee range of motion post arthroplasty: clinical applications.

Authors:  Paul W Stratford; Deborah M Kennedy; Susan F Robarts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  High-flexion total knee replacement: functional outcome at one year.

Authors:  Matthew S Hepinstall; Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-01-29

9.  Continuous passive motion and its effects on knee flexion after total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Chun-De Liao; Yi-Ching Huang; Li-Fong Lin; Yen-Shuo Chiu; Jui-Chen Tsai; Chun-Lung Chen; Tsan-Hon Liou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Tom M van Raaij; Max Reijman; Andrea D Furlan; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.