Literature DB >> 29774599

Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy.

Zhaoye Zhou1, Gengyan Zhao2, Richard Kijowski2, Fang Liu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate a new segmentation method using deep convolutional neural network (CNN), 3D fully connected conditional random field (CRF), and 3D simplex deformable modeling to improve the efficiency and accuracy of knee joint tissue segmentation.
METHODS: A segmentation pipeline was built by combining a semantic segmentation CNN, 3D fully connected CRF, and 3D simplex deformable modeling. A convolutional encoder-decoder network was designed as the core of the segmentation method to perform high resolution pixel-wise multi-class tissue classification for 12 different joint structures. The 3D fully connected CRF was applied to regularize contextual relationship among voxels within the same tissue class and between different classes. The 3D simplex deformable modeling refined the output from 3D CRF to preserve the overall shape and maintain a desirable smooth surface for joint structures. The method was evaluated on 3D fast spin-echo (3D-FSE) MR image data sets. Quantitative morphological metrics were used to evaluate the accuracy and robustness of the method in comparison to the ground truth data.
RESULTS: The proposed segmentation method provided good performance for segmenting all knee joint structures. There were 4 tissue types with high mean Dice coefficient above 0.9 including the femur, tibia, muscle, and other non-specified tissues. There were 7 tissue types with mean Dice coefficient between 0.8 and 0.9 including the femoral cartilage, tibial cartilage, patella, patellar cartilage, meniscus, quadriceps and patellar tendon, and infrapatellar fat pad. There was 1 tissue type with mean Dice coefficient between 0.7 and 0.8 for joint effusion and Baker's cyst. Most musculoskeletal tissues had a mean value of average symmetric surface distance below 1 mm.
CONCLUSION: The combined CNN, 3D fully connected CRF, and 3D deformable modeling approach was well-suited for performing rapid and accurate comprehensive tissue segmentation of the knee joint. The deep learning-based segmentation method has promising potential applications in musculoskeletal imaging.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditional random field; deep learning; deformable model; image segmentation; knee; musculoskeletal imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29774599      PMCID: PMC6342268          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  46 in total

1.  Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Hyungseok Jang; Alexey Samsonov; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Relationship Between Knee Pain and Infrapatellar Fat Pad Morphology: A Within- and Between-Person Analysis From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Eva Steidle-Kloc; Adam G Culvenor; Jan Dörrenberg; Wolfgang Wirth; Anja Ruhdorfer; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  A novel method for assessing signal intensity within infrapatellar fat pad on MR images in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M Lu; Z Chen; W Han; Z Zhu; X Jin; D J Hunter; C Ding
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  T₁ρ and T₂ relaxation times predict progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A P Prasad; L Nardo; J Schooler; G B Joseph; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  The association of bone marrow lesions with pain in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D T Felson; C E Chaisson; C L Hill; S M Totterman; M E Gale; K M Skinner; L Kazis; D R Gale
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Change in regional cartilage morphology and joint space width in osteoarthritis participants versus healthy controls: a multicentre study using 3.0 Tesla MRI and Lyon-Schuss radiography.

Authors:  M-P Hellio Le Graverand; R J Buck; B T Wyman; E Vignon; S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; M Piperno; H C Charles; M Hudelmaier; D J Hunter; C Jackson; V Byers Kraus; T M Link; S Majumdar; P V Prasad; T J Schnitzer; A Vaz; W Wirth; F Eckstein
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee.

Authors:  Jurgen Fripp; Stuart Crozier; Simon K Warfield; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Does cartilage volume or thickness distinguish knees with and without mild radiographic osteoarthritis? The Framingham Study.

Authors:  S Reichenbach; M Yang; F Eckstein; J Niu; D J Hunter; C E McLennan; A Guermazi; F Roemer; M Hudelmaier; P Aliabadi; D T Felson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Long term evaluation of disease progression through the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients: correlation with clinical symptoms and radiographic changes.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Marie-Josée Berthiaume; Gilles Beaudoin; Denis Choquette; Boulos Haraoui; Hyman Tannenbaum; Joan M Meyer; John F Beary; Gary A Cline; Jean-Pierre Pelletier
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Evaluation of bone marrow lesion volume as a knee osteoarthritis biomarker--longitudinal relationships with pain and structural changes: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Price; Grace H Lo; Jincheng Pang; David J Hunter; Eric Miller; Robert J Ward; Charles B Eaton; John A Lynch; Timothy E McAlindon
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology.

Authors:  Pauley Chea; Jacob C Mandell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Automatic Breast and Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI Using Deep Learning by a Fully-Convolutional Residual Neural Network U-Net.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Kai-Ting Chang; Vivian Youngjean Park; Min Jung Kim; Siwa Chan; Peter Chang; Daniel Chow; Alex Luk; Tiffany Kwong; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Deep convolutional neural networks with multiplane consensus labeling for lung function quantification using UTE proton MRI.

Authors:  Wei Zha; Sean B Fain; Mark L Schiebler; Michael D Evans; Scott K Nagle; Fang Liu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Deep Learning Approach for Evaluating Knee MR Images: Achieving High Diagnostic Performance for Cartilage Lesion Detection.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Alexey Samsonov; Donna Blankenbaker; Will Larison; Andrew Kanarek; Kevin Lian; Shivkumar Kambhampati; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Romil F Shah; Alejandro M Martinez; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas P Vail; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Knee menisci segmentation and relaxometry of 3D ultrashort echo time cones MR imaging using attention U-Net with transfer learning.

Authors:  Michal Byra; Mei Wu; Xiaodong Zhang; Hyungseok Jang; Ya-Jun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Sameer Shah; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Performance Comparison of Individual and Ensemble CNN Models for the Classification of Brain 18F-FDG-PET Scans.

Authors:  Tomomi Nobashi; Claudia Zacharias; Jason K Ellis; Valentina Ferri; Mary Ellen Koran; Benjamin L Franc; Andrei Iagaru; Guido A Davidzon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  GRASP-Pro: imProving GRASP DCE-MRI through self-calibrating subspace-modeling and contrast phase automation.

Authors:  Li Feng; Qiuting Wen; Chenchan Huang; Angela Tong; Fang Liu; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence in Musculoskeletal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Soterios Gyftopoulos; Dana Lin; Florian Knoll; Ankur M Doshi; Tatiane Cantarelli Rodrigues; Michael P Recht
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Technical Note: Deep learning based MRAC using rapid ultrashort echo time imaging.

Authors:  Hyungseok Jang; Fang Liu; Gengyan Zhao; Tyler Bradshaw; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.