Literature DB >> 19520633

Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee.

Jurgen Fripp1, Stuart Crozier, Simon K Warfield, Sébastien Ourselin.   

Abstract

In this paper, we present a segmentation scheme that automatically and accurately segments all the cartilages from magnetic resonance (MR) images of nonpathological knees. Our scheme involves the automatic segmentation of the bones using a three-dimensional active shape model, the extraction of the expected bone-cartilage interface (BCI), and cartilage segmentation from the BCI using a deformable model that utilizes localization, patient specific tissue estimation and a model of the thickness variation. The accuracy of this scheme was experimentally validated using leave one out experiments on a database of fat suppressed spoiled gradient recall MR images. The scheme was compared to three state of the art approaches, tissue classification, a modified semi-automatic watershed algorithm and nonrigid registration (B-spline based free form deformation). Our scheme obtained an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of (0.83, 0.83, 0.85) for the (patellar, tibial, femoral) cartilages, while (0.82, 0.81, 0.86) was obtained with a tissue classifier and (0.73, 0.79, 0.76) was obtained with nonrigid registration. The average DSC obtained for all the cartilages using a semi-automatic watershed algorithm (0.90) was slightly higher than our approach (0.89), however unlike this approach we segment each cartilage as a separate object. The effectiveness of our approach for quantitative analysis was evaluated using volume and thickness measures with a median volume difference error of (5.92, 4.65, 5.69) and absolute Laplacian thickness difference of (0.13, 0.24, 0.12) mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19520633      PMCID: PMC3717377          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2024743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  26 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo.

Authors:  Jan Hohe; Gerard Ateshian; Maximilian Reiser; Karl-Hans Englmeier; Felix Eckstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation.

Authors:  Simon K Warfield; Kelly H Zou; William M Wells
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information.

Authors:  V Grau; A U J Mewes; M Alcañiz; R Kikinis; S K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Cartilage volume quantification via Live Wire segmentation.

Authors:  Alexander J Gougoutas; Andrew J Wheaton; Arijitt Borthakur; Erik M Shapiro; J Bruce Kneeland; Jayaram K Udupa; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements.

Authors:  Z A Cohen; D M McCarthy; S D Kwak; P Legrand; F Fogarasi; E J Ciaccio; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living.

Authors:  T Stammberger; F Eckstein; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model.

Authors:  Claude Kauffmann; Pierre Gravel; Benoît Godbout; Alain Gravel; Gilles Beaudoin; Jean-Pierre Raynauld; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Jacques A de Guise
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Automated voxel-based 3D cortical thickness measurement in a combined Lagrangian-Eulerian PDE approach using partial volume maps.

Authors:  Oscar Acosta; Pierrick Bourgeat; Maria A Zuluaga; Jurgen Fripp; Olivier Salvado; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Schnier; M Haubner; J Priebsch; C Glaser; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  39 in total

1.  LOGISMOS--layered optimal graph image segmentation of multiple objects and surfaces: cartilage segmentation in the knee joint.

Authors:  Yin Yin; Xiangmin Zhang; Rachel Williams; Xiaodong Wu; Donald D Anderson; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Predicting early symptomatic osteoarthritis in the human knee using machine learning classification of magnetic resonance images from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Beth G Ashinsky; Mustapha Bouhrara; Christopher E Coletta; Benoit Lehallier; Kenneth L Urish; Ping-Chang Lin; Ilya G Goldberg; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Quantitative MRI in the evaluation of articular cartilage health: reproducibility and variability with a focus on T2 mapping.

Authors:  Rachel K Surowiec; Erin P Lucas; Charles P Ho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Hyungseok Jang; Alexey Samsonov; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Automatic segmentation of high- and low-field knee MRIs using knee image quantification with data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Erik B Dam; Martin Lillholm; Joselene Marques; Mads Nielsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  Unifying the seeds auto-generation (SAGE) with knee cartilage segmentation framework: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Hong-Seng Gan; Khairil Amir Sayuti; Muhammad Hanif Ramlee; Yeng-Seng Lee; Wan Mahani Hafizah Wan Mahmud; Ahmad Helmy Abdul Karim
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Shape-based acetabular cartilage segmentation: application to CT and MRI datasets.

Authors:  Pooneh R Tabrizi; Reza A Zoroofi; Futoshi Yokota; Takashi Nishii; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Automatic atlas-based three-label cartilage segmentation from MR knee images.

Authors:  Liang Shan; Christopher Zach; Cecil Charles; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Tool for osteoarthritis risk prediction (TOARP) over 8 years using baseline clinical data, X-ray, and MRI: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Gabby B Joseph; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; Jan Neumann; Alexandra S Gersing; Martin Kretzschmar; Benedikt J Schwaiger; John A Lynch; Ursula Heilmeier; Nancy E Lane; Thomas M Link
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Learning-Based Cost Functions for 3-D and 4-D Multi-Surface Multi-Object Segmentation of Knee MRI: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Satyananda Kashyap; Honghai Zhang; Karan Rao; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.