Literature DB >> 19193659

Does cartilage volume or thickness distinguish knees with and without mild radiographic osteoarthritis? The Framingham Study.

S Reichenbach1, M Yang, F Eckstein, J Niu, D J Hunter, C E McLennan, A Guermazi, F Roemer, M Hudelmaier, P Aliabadi, D T Felson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the quantity of cartilage or semiquantitative scores actually differ in knees with mild radiographic osteoarthritis compared with knees without osteoarthritis.
METHODS: Framingham Osteoarthritis Study participants had knee tibiofemoral magnetic resonance imaging-based measurements of cartilage. Using three-dimensional FLASH-water excitation sequences, cartilage volume, thickness and subregional cartilage thickness were measured and cartilage scored semiquantitatively (using the whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score; WORMS). Using weight-bearing radiographs, mild osteoarthritis was defined as Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade 2 and non-osteoarthritis as K/L grade 0. Differences between osteoarthritis and non-osteoarthritis knees in median cartilage measurements were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
RESULTS: Among 948 participants (one knee each), neither cartilage volume nor regional thickness were different in mild versus non-osteoarthritis knees. In mild osteoarthritis, cartilage erosions in focal areas were missed when cartilage was quantified over large regions such as the medial tibia. For some but not all subregions of cartilage, especially among men, cartilage thickness was lower (p<0.05) in mild osteoarthritis than non-osteoarthritis knees. Because semiquantitative scores captured focal erosions, median WORMS scores were higher in mild osteoarthritis than non-osteoarthritis (all p<0.05). In moderate/severe osteoarthritis (K/L grades 3 or 4), osteoarthritis knees had much lower cartilage thickness and higher WORMS scores than knees without osteoarthritis.
CONCLUSIONS: In mild osteoarthritis, the focal loss of cartilage is missed by quantitative measures of cartilage volume or thickness over broad areas. Regional cartilage volume and thickness (eg, medial tibia) are not different in mild osteoarthritis versus non-osteoarthritis. Subregional thickness may be decreased in mild osteoarthritis. Semiquantitative scoring that assesses focal cartilage damage differentiates mild osteoarthritis from non-osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19193659      PMCID: PMC2794983          DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.099200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  34 in total

1.  Osteophytes and progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D T Felson; D R Gale; M Elon Gale; J Niu; D J Hunter; J Goggins; M P Lavalley
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  The relationship between cartilage loss on magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic progression in men and women with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Shreyasee Amin; Michael P LaValley; Ali Guermazi; Mikayel Grigoryan; David J Hunter; Margaret Clancy; Jingbo Niu; Daniel R Gale; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-10

3.  Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; H Cecil Charles; Robert J Buck; Virginia B Kraus; Ann E Remmers; Martin Hudelmaier; Wolfgang Wirth; Jeffrey L Evelhoch
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-10

4.  Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements.

Authors:  Z A Cohen; D M McCarthy; S D Kwak; P Legrand; F Fogarasi; E J Ciaccio; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Femorotibial and patellar cartilage loss in patients prior to total knee arthroplasty, heterogeneity, and correlation with alignment of the knee.

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Graichen; M Hudelmaier; T Vogl; L Sharma; F Eckstein
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Tibial plateau size is related to grade of joint space narrowing and osteophytes in healthy women and in women with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A E Wluka; Y Wang; S R Davis; F M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Masi; Christian A Sell; Catherine Phan; Eric Han; David Newitt; Lynne Steinbach; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R Burgkart; C Glaser; S Hinterwimmer; M Hudelmaier; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser; F Eckstein
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-10

9.  Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R D Altman; J F Fries; D A Bloch; J Carstens; T D Cooke; H Genant; P Gofton; H Groth; D J McShane; W A Murphy
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1987-11

10.  Correlation and sex differences between ankle and knee cartilage morphology determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; V Siedek; C Glaser; D Al-Ali; K-H Englmeier; M Reiser; H Graichen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  20 in total

1.  Changes in knee cartilage T2 values over 24 months in subjects with and without risk factors for knee osteoarthritis and their association with focal knee lesions at baseline: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Christoph Stehling; Gabby B Joseph; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Christina Müller-Höcker; Michael C Nevitt; John Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Breaking the Law of Valgus: the surprising and unexplained prevalence of medial patellofemoral cartilage damage.

Authors:  K Douglas Gross; Jingbo Niu; Joshua J Stefanik; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Leena Sharma; Michael C Nevitt; Neil A Segal; Cora E Lewis; David T Felson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Comparison of BLOKS and WORMS scoring systems part II. Longitudinal assessment of knee MRIs for osteoarthritis and suggested approach based on their performance: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  D T Felson; J Lynch; A Guermazi; F W Roemer; J Niu; T McAlindon; M C Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Reference values and Z-scores for subregional femorotibial cartilage thickness--results from a large population-based sample (Framingham) and comparison with the non-exposed Osteoarthritis Initiative reference cohort.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Yang; A Guermazi; F W Roemer; M Hudelmaier; K Picha; F Baribaud; W Wirth; D T Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Mechanically stimulated biomarkers signal cartilage changes over 5 years consistent with disease progression in medial knee osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Shikha Sheth; Jennifer C Erhart-Hledik; Bao Do; Matthew R Titchenal; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Quantitative versus semiquantitative MR imaging of cartilage in blood-induced arthritic ankles: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Andrea S Doria; Ningning Zhang; Bjorn Lundin; Pamela Hilliard; Carina Man; Ruth Weiss; Gary Detzler; Victor Blanchette; Rahim Moineddin; Felix Eckstein; Marshall S Sussman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-02-13

7.  Tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis: risk factors for MR-depicted fast cartilage loss over a 30-month period in the multicenter osteoarthritis study.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Yuqing Zhang; Jingbo Niu; John A Lynch; Michel D Crema; Monica D Marra; Michael C Nevitt; David T Felson; Laura B Hughes; George Y El-Khoury; Martin Englund; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of knee joint anatomy.

Authors:  Zhaoye Zhou; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski; Fang Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Patterns of femoral cartilage thickness are different in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees and can be used to detect disease-related differences between samples.

Authors:  Julien Favre; Sean F Scanlan; Jenifer C Erhart-Hledik; Katerina Blazek; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Prediction of medial tibiofemoral compartment joint space loss progression using volumetric cartilage measurements: Data from the FNIH OA biomarkers consortium.

Authors:  Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; David J Hunter; Erik B Dam; Bashir Zikria; C Kent Kwoh; Shadpour Demehri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.