Literature DB >> 31535731

Knee menisci segmentation and relaxometry of 3D ultrashort echo time cones MR imaging using attention U-Net with transfer learning.

Michal Byra1,2, Mei Wu1, Xiaodong Zhang1, Hyungseok Jang1, Ya-Jun Ma1, Eric Y Chang1,3, Sameer Shah4, Jiang Du1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning-based method for knee menisci segmentation in 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) cones MR imaging, and to automatically determine MR relaxation times, namely the T1, T1ρ , and T 2 ∗ parameters, which can be used to assess knee osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS: Whole knee joint imaging was performed using 3D UTE cones sequences to collect data from 61 human subjects. Regions of interest (ROIs) were outlined by 2 experienced radiologists based on subtracted T1ρ -weighted MR images. Transfer learning was applied to develop 2D attention U-Net convolutional neural networks for the menisci segmentation based on each radiologist's ROIs separately. Dice scores were calculated to assess segmentation performance. Next, the T1, T1ρ , T 2 ∗ relaxations, and ROI areas were determined for the manual and automatic segmentations, then compared.
RESULTS: The models developed using ROIs provided by 2 radiologists achieved high Dice scores of 0.860 and 0.833, while the radiologists' manual segmentations achieved a Dice score of 0.820. Linear correlation coefficients for the T1, T1ρ , and T 2 ∗ relaxations calculated using the automatic and manual segmentations ranged between 0.90 and 0.97, and there were no associated differences between the estimated average meniscal relaxation parameters. The deep learning models achieved segmentation performance equivalent to the inter-observer variability of 2 radiologists.
CONCLUSION: The proposed deep learning-based approach can be used to efficiently generate automatic segmentations and determine meniscal relaxations times. The method has the potential to help radiologists with the assessment of meniscal diseases, such as OA.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep learning; menisci; osteoarthritis; quantitative MR; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31535731      PMCID: PMC6879791          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  29 in total

1.  Correlation of semiquantitative vs quantitative MRI meniscus measures in osteoarthritic knees: results from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  K Bloecker; A Guermazi; W Wirth; C K Kwoh; H Resch; D J Hunter; F Eckstein
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Keelin Murphy; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Deep convolutional neural network and 3D deformable approach for tissue segmentation in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Zhaoye Zhou; Hyungseok Jang; Alexey Samsonov; Gengyan Zhao; Richard Kijowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Whole knee joint T1 values measured in vivo at 3T by combined 3D ultrashort echo time cones actual flip angle and variable flip angle methods.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Wei Zhao; Lidi Wan; Tan Guo; Adam Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  A deep feature fusion methodology for breast cancer diagnosis demonstrated on three imaging modality datasets.

Authors:  Natalia Antropova; Benjamin Q Huynh; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Semi-automated segmentation to assess the lateral meniscus in normal and osteoarthritic knees.

Authors:  M S Swanson; J W Prescott; T M Best; K Powell; R D Jackson; F Haq; M N Gurcan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Meniscal measurements of T1rho and T2 at MR imaging in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Isabel Rauscher; Robert Stahl; Jonathan Cheng; Xiaojuan Li; Markus B Huber; Anthony Luke; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The effects of meniscus injury on the development of knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Jayshiv T Badlani; Camilo Borrero; Saraswati Golla; Christopher D Harner; James J Irrgang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care.

Authors:  Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Annika Reinke; Sinan Onogur; Marko Stankovic; Patrick Scholz; Tal Arbel; Hrvoje Bogunovic; Andrew P Bradley; Aaron Carass; Carolin Feldmann; Alejandro F Frangi; Peter M Full; Bram van Ginneken; Allan Hanbury; Katrin Honauer; Michal Kozubek; Bennett A Landman; Keno März; Oskar Maier; Klaus Maier-Hein; Bjoern H Menze; Henning Müller; Peter F Neher; Wiro Niessen; Nasir Rajpoot; Gregory C Sharp; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Stefanie Speidel; Christian Stock; Danail Stoyanov; Abdel Aziz Taha; Fons van der Sommen; Ching-Wei Wang; Marc-André Weber; Guoyan Zheng; Pierre Jannin; Annette Kopp-Schneider
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessment of knee pain from MR imaging using a convolutional Siamese network.

Authors:  Gary H Chang; David T Felson; Shangran Qiu; Ali Guermazi; Terence D Capellini; Vijaya B Kolachalama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Automated cartilage segmentation and quantification using 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) cones MR imaging with deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Yan-Ping Xue; Hyungseok Jang; Michal Byra; Zhen-Yu Cai; Mei Wu; Eric Y Chang; Ya-Jun Ma; Jiang Du
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Augmenting Osteoporosis Imaging with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Francesco Caliva; Galateia Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Preparing infection detection technology for hospital at home after lower limb external fixation.

Authors:  Sowmya Annadatha; Qirui Hua; Marie Fridberg; Tobias Lindstrøm Jensen; Jianan Liu; Søren Kold; Ole Rahbek; Ming Shen
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-06-26

Review 5.  Ultrashort Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques: Met and Unmet Needs in Musculoskeletal Imaging.

Authors:  Amir Masoud Afsahi; Yajun Ma; Hyungseok Jang; Saeed Jerban; Christine B Chung; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.119

6.  Breast mass segmentation in ultrasound with selective kernel U-Net convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Michal Byra; Piotr Jarosik; Aleksandra Szubert; Michael Galperin; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Linda Olson; Mary O'Boyle; Christopher Comstock; Michael Andre
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.880

7.  Automated Final Lesion Segmentation in Posterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Riaan Zoetmulder; Praneeta R Konduri; Iris V Obdeijn; Efstratios Gavves; Ivana Išgum; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel; Yvo B W E M Roos; Mayank Goyal; Peter J Mitchell; Bruce C V Campbell; Demetrius K Lopes; Gernot Reimann; Tudor G Jovin; Jeffrey L Saver; Keith W Muir; Phil White; Serge Bracard; Bailiang Chen; Scott Brown; Wouter J Schonewille; Erik van der Hoeven; Volker Puetz; Henk A Marquering
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.