Literature DB >> 29769209

Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.

Ying Yuan1, Ruitao Lin2,3, Daniel Li4, Lei Nie5, Katherine E Warren6.   

Abstract

Late-onset toxicity is common for novel molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy. It causes major logistic difficulty for existing adaptive phase I trial designs, which require the observance of toxicity early enough to apply dose-escalation rules for new patients. The same logistic difficulty arises when the accrual is rapid. We propose the time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval (TITE-BOIN) design to accelerate phase I trials by allowing for real-time dose assignment decisions for new patients while some enrolled patients' toxicity data are still pending. Similar to the rolling six design, the TITE-BOIN dose-escalation/deescalation rule can be tabulated before the trial begins, making it transparent and simple to implement, but is more flexible in choosing the target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate and has higher accuracy to identify the MTD. Compared with the more complicated model-based time-to-event continuous reassessment method (TITE-CRM), the TITE-BOIN has comparable accuracy to identify the MTD but is simpler to implement with substantially better overdose control. As the TITE-CRM is more aggressive in dose escalation, it is less likely to underdose patients. When there are no pending data, the TITE-BOIN seamlessly reduces to the BOIN design. Numerical studies show that the TITE-BOIN design supports continuous accrual without sacrificing patient safety or the accuracy of identifying the MTD, and therefore has great potential to accelerate early-phase drug development. Clin Cancer Res; 24(20); 4921-30. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29769209      PMCID: PMC6191365          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  18 in total

1.  Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Is autoimmunity the Achilles' heel of cancer immunotherapy?

Authors:  Carl H June; Jeremy T Warshauer; Jeffrey A Bluestone
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Kenneth R Hess; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Phase I trials of molecularly targeted agents: should we pay more attention to late toxicities?

Authors:  Sophie Postel-Vinay; Carlos Gomez-Roca; L Rhoda Molife; Bhavesh Anghan; Antonin Levy; Ian Judson; Johann De Bono; Jean-Charles Soria; Stan Kaye; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ick Hoon Jin; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Daniel Normolle; Theodore Lawrence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Fangrong Yan; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials.

Authors:  Roderick J Little; Ralph D'Agostino; Michael L Cohen; Kay Dickersin; Scott S Emerson; John T Farrar; Constantine Frangakis; Joseph W Hogan; Geert Molenberghs; Susan A Murphy; James D Neaton; Andrea Rotnitzky; Daniel Scharfstein; Weichung J Shih; Jay P Siegel; Hal Stern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control.

Authors:  J Babb; A Rogatko; S Zacks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Shortening the timeline of pediatric phase I trials: the rolling six design.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Skolnik; Jeffrey S Barrett; Bhuvana Jayaraman; Dimple Patel; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  23 in total

1.  BOIN12: Bayesian Optimal Interval Phase I/II Trial Design for Utility-Based Dose Finding in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Yanhong Zhou; Fangrong Yan; Daniel Li; Ying Yuan
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-11-16

2.  TOP: Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Phase II Trial Design for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Robert L Coleman; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Model-Assisted Designs for Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Simplicity Meets Superiority.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  On the relative efficiency of model-assisted designs: a conditional approach.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Phase 1 study of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with AT7519, a pan-CDK inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Khanh T Do; Geraldine O'Sullivan Coyne; John L Hays; Jeffrey G Supko; Stephen V Liu; Kristin Beebe; Len Neckers; Jane B Trepel; Min-Jung Lee; Tomoko Smyth; Courtney Gannon; Jennifer Hedglin; Alona Muzikansky; Susana Campos; John Lyons; Percy Ivy; James H Doroshow; Alice P Chen; Geoffrey I Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Time-to-event model-assisted designs for dose-finding trials with delayed toxicity.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  A comparative study of Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design with interval 3+3 (i3+3) design for phase I oncology dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Yanhong Zhou; Ruobing Li; Fangrong Yan; J Jack Lee; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.452

Review 8.  Advancing Effective Clinical Trial Designs for Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Heidi E Kosiorek; Amylou C Dueck
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.722

9.  BOIN Suite: A Software Platform to Design and Implement Novel Early-Phase Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Yanhong Zhou; Ruitao Lin; Ying-Wei Kuo; J Jack Lee; Ying Yuan
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-01

10.  Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.

Authors:  Shing M Lee; Nolan A Wages; Karyn A Goodman; A Craig Lockhart
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.