Khanh T Do1,2, Geraldine O'Sullivan Coyne3, John L Hays4, Jeffrey G Supko5, Stephen V Liu6, Kristin Beebe7, Len Neckers7, Jane B Trepel8, Min-Jung Lee8, Tomoko Smyth9, Courtney Gannon10, Jennifer Hedglin10, Alona Muzikansky11, Susana Campos10, John Lyons9, Percy Ivy3, James H Doroshow3, Alice P Chen3, Geoffrey I Shapiro10. 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Khanh_Do@dfci.harvard.edu. 2. Center for Cancer Therapeutic Innovation, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue -DA2010, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. Khanh_Do@dfci.harvard.edu. 3. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 5. Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. 7. Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 8. Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 9. Astex Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, UK. 10. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 11. Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase 1 trial of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with the CDK inhibitor AT7519, in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the safety profile and maximally tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, preliminary antitumor activity, and to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on HSP70 expression in patient-derived PBMCs and plasma. METHODS: This study followed a 3 + 3 trial design with 1 week of intravenous (IV) onalespib alone, followed by onalespib/AT7519 (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-days cycle. PK and PD samples were collected at baseline, after onalespib alone, and following combination therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were treated with the demonstration of downstream target engagement of HSP70 expression in plasma and PBMCs. The maximally tolerated dose was onalespib 80 mg/m2 IV + AT7519 21 mg/m2 IV. Most common drug-related adverse events included Grade 1/2 diarrhea (79%), fatigue (54%), mucositis (57%), nausea (46%), and vomiting (50%). Partial responses were seen in a palate adenocarcinoma and Sertoli-Leydig tumor; a colorectal and an endometrial cancer patient both remained on study for ten cycles with stable disease as the best response. There were no clinically relevant PK interactions for either drug. CONCLUSIONS: Combined onalespib and AT7519 is tolerable, though below monotherapy RP2D. Promising preliminary clinical activity was seen. Further benefit may be seen with the incorporation of molecular signature pre-selection. Further biomarker development will require the assessment of the on-target impact on relevant client proteins in tumor tissue.
PURPOSE: We conducted a phase 1 trial of the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib in combination with the CDK inhibitor AT7519, in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the safety profile and maximally tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, preliminary antitumor activity, and to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on HSP70 expression in patient-derived PBMCs and plasma. METHODS: This study followed a 3 + 3 trial design with 1 week of intravenous (IV) onalespib alone, followed by onalespib/AT7519 (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-days cycle. PK and PD samples were collected at baseline, after onalespib alone, and following combination therapy. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were treated with the demonstration of downstream target engagement of HSP70 expression in plasma and PBMCs. The maximally tolerated dose was onalespib 80 mg/m2 IV + AT7519 21 mg/m2 IV. Most common drug-related adverse events included Grade 1/2 diarrhea (79%), fatigue (54%), mucositis (57%), nausea (46%), and vomiting (50%). Partial responses were seen in a palate adenocarcinoma and Sertoli-Leydig tumor; a colorectal and an endometrial cancerpatient both remained on study for ten cycles with stable disease as the best response. There were no clinically relevant PK interactions for either drug. CONCLUSIONS: Combined onalespib and AT7519 is tolerable, though below monotherapy RP2D. Promising preliminary clinical activity was seen. Further benefit may be seen with the incorporation of molecular signature pre-selection. Further biomarker development will require the assessment of the on-target impact on relevant client proteins in tumor tissue.
Authors: Hyunseok Kang; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Jun Luo; Qizhi Zheng; Lisa Rooper; Angelo M De Marzo; William H Westra; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Fei Guo; Kathy Rocha; Purva Bali; Michael Pranpat; Warren Fiskus; Sandhya Boyapalle; Sandhya Kumaraswamy; Maria Balasis; Benjamin Greedy; E Simon M Armitage; Nicholas Lawrence; Kapil Bhalla Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: L Ravagnan; S Gurbuxani; S A Susin; C Maisse; E Daugas; N Zamzami; T Mak; M Jäättelä; J M Penninger; C Garrido; G Kroemer Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Paul G Wyatt; Andrew J Woodhead; Valerio Berdini; John A Boulstridge; Maria G Carr; David M Cross; Deborah J Davis; Lindsay A Devine; Theresa R Early; Ruth E Feltell; E Jonathan Lewis; Rachel L McMenamin; Eva F Navarro; Michael A O'Brien; Marc O'Reilly; Matthias Reule; Gordon Saxty; Lisa C A Seavers; Donna-Michelle Smith; Matt S Squires; Gary Trewartha; Margaret T Walker; Alison J-A Woolford Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-07-26 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Keith H Jansson; John B Tucker; Lauren E Stahl; John K Simmons; Caitlyn Fuller; Michael L Beshiri; Supreet Agarwal; Lei Fang; Paul G Hynes; Aian Neil Alilin; Ross Lake; Yasmine C Abbey; Jacob Cawley; Caitlin M Tice; JuanJuan Yin; Crystal McKnight; Carleen Klummp-Thomas; Xiaohu Zhang; Rajarshi Guha; Shelley Hoover; R Mark Simpson; Holly M Nguyen; Eva Corey; Craig J Thomas; David A Proia; Kathleen Kelly Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Alexander F Bruns; Nadira Yuldasheva; Antony M Latham; Leyuan Bao; Caroline Pellet-Many; Paul Frankel; Sam L Stephen; Gareth J Howell; Stephen B Wheatcroft; Mark T Kearney; Ian C Zachary; Sreenivasan Ponnambalam Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tabassom Mohajershojai; Preeti Jha; Anna Boström; Fredrik Y Frejd; Paul J Yazaki; Marika Nestor Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 5.738