Literature DB >> 27407096

Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.

Ying Yuan1, Kenneth R Hess2, Susan G Hilsenbeck3, Mark R Gilbert4.   

Abstract

Despite more than two decades of publications that offer more innovative model-based designs, the classical 3 + 3 design remains the most dominant phase I trial design in practice. In this article, we introduce a new trial design, the Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design. The BOIN design is easy to implement in a way similar to the 3 + 3 design, but is more flexible for choosing the target toxicity rate and cohort size and yields a substantially better performance that is comparable with that of more complex model-based designs. The BOIN design contains the 3 + 3 design and the accelerated titration design as special cases, thus linking it to established phase I approaches. A numerical study shows that the BOIN design generally outperforms the 3 + 3 design and the modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI) design. The BOIN design is more likely than the 3 + 3 design to correctly select the MTD and allocate more patients to the MTD. Compared with the mTPI design, the BOIN design has a substantially lower risk of overdosing patients and generally a higher probability of correctly selecting the MTD. User-friendly software is freely available to facilitate the application of the BOIN design. Clin Cancer Res; 22(17); 4291-301. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27407096      PMCID: PMC5047439          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  21 in total

1.  Improved up-and-down designs for phase I trials.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Aliakbar Montazer-Haghighi; Sri Gopal Mohanty; Stephen D Durham
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Guosheng Yin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs.

Authors:  E L Korn; D Midthune; T T Chen; L V Rubinstein; M C Christian; R M Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Up-and-down designs for phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Chunyan Cai; Jing Ning
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials with late-onset toxicities.

Authors:  Y K Cheung; R Chappell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  BAYESIAN DATA AUGMENTATION DOSE FINDING WITH CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD AND DELAYED TOXICITY.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Guosheng Yin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Shortening the timeline of pediatric phase I trials: the rolling six design.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Skolnik; Jeffrey S Barrett; Bhuvana Jayaraman; Dimple Patel; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; J Jack Lee; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  38 in total

1.  BOIN12: Bayesian Optimal Interval Phase I/II Trial Design for Utility-Based Dose Finding in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Yanhong Zhou; Fangrong Yan; Daniel Li; Ying Yuan
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-11-16

2.  Coherence principles in interval-based dose finding.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Alexia Iasonos; John O'Quigley; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 3.  Model-Assisted Designs for Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Simplicity Meets Superiority.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  Bayesian clinical trials at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: An update.

Authors:  Rebecca S Slack Tidwell; S Andrew Peng; Minxing Chen; Diane D Liu; Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  The Impact of Early-Phase Trial Design in the Drug Development Process.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Fangrong Yan; Sumithra J Mandrekar; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  On the relative efficiency of model-assisted designs: a conditional approach.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Evaluation of irrational dose assignment definitions using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Evan Bagley
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; Ruitao Lin; Daniel Li; Lei Nie; Katherine E Warren
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Revisiting isotonic phase I design in the era of model-assisted dose-finding.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.