Literature DB >> 29767271

Graft failure is more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autograft.

E Laboute1, E James-Belin2, P L Puig2, P Trouve2, E Verhaeghe2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with hamstring or patellar tendon was evaluated in a French population of athletes.
METHODS: Athletes who had undergone ACL autograft reconstruction and who received rehabilitation care at the European Center for Sports Rehabilitation (CERS; Capbreton, France) were screened for this prospective cohort study. Eligibility criteria included a simple hamstring autograft or patellar tendon autograft surgical technique. Patients were contacted by phone to participate in follow-up during the second year after surgery. The primary endpoint was the graft failure frequency, evaluated with a multivariate logistic model with adjustment for baseline patient characteristics. The secondary endpoint was time to graft failure, analyzed by an adjusted Cox model.
RESULTS: A total of 2424 athletes were included after having a hamstring autograft (semitendinosus and gracilis) or a patellar tendon autograft between 2011 and 2014. Of the 988 athletes who responded to a follow-up phone call (40.7% response rate), 33 were excluded for new contralateral ACL rupture (3.3%), with 955 included for analysis (713 hamstring autografts; 242 patellar-tendon autografts). There were no significant differences between the baseline characteristics of the patients analyzed and the population which did not respond to the questionnaire. A significant difference in the frequency of graft failure was seen, 6.5% for hamstring autografts vs 2.1% for patellar-tendon autografts [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.64, 95% CI (1.55; 10.67); p = 0.007]. Mean time to graft failure was 10.7 vs 17.4 months for hamstring and patellar-tendon autografts respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.50, 95% CI (1.53; 10.11); p = 0.008]. Age less than 25 years significantly increased the frequency of graft failure [adjusted OR = 3.85 (1.89; 8.72); p < 0.001]. The rate of patients returning to competitive sport after the first graft was not significantly different for the two techniques: 70.8% for hamstring and 77.8% for patellar tendon [adjusted OR = 0.718; 95% CI (0.50; 1.02)].
CONCLUSIONS: Graft failure is significantly more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autografts in a French population, despite similar rates of return to competition. Athletes aged less than 25 years have a higher risk of failure than those aged ≥ 25 years. Our results are in accordance with recent Scandinavian studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Athletes; Graft failure; Hamstring tendon autograft; Patellar-tendon autograft; Sport

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29767271     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4982-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  36 in total

1.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Francesco Giron; Roberto Buzzi; Flavio Biddau; Francesco Sasso
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Max J Kääb; Jessica Schallock; Norbert P Haas; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John Bergfeld; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  Comparison of Graft Failure Rate Between Autografts Placed via an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.

Authors:  Conrad M Gabler; Cale A Jacobs; Jennifer Sebert Howard; Carl G Mattacola; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lucy Salmon; Vivianne Russell; Tim Musgrove; Leo Pinczewski; Kathryn Refshauge
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Justin Roe; Leo A Pinczewski; Vivianne J Russell; Lucy J Salmon; Tomomaro Kawamata; Melvin Chew
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  I S Corry; J M Webb; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer.

Authors:  J M Bjordal; F Arnły; B Hannestad; T Strand
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  Gene R Barrett; Frank K Noojin; Charles W Hartzog; Carrie R Nash
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  11 in total

1.  Tibial slope and medial meniscectomy significantly influence short-term knee laxity following ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  David Dejour; Marco Pungitore; Jeremy Valluy; Luca Nover; Mo Saffarini; Guillaume Demey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft maturation is superior to double-bundle hamstring tendon autograft maturation following anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hideaki Fukuda; Takahiro Ogura; Shigehiro Asai; Toru Omodani; Tatsuya Takahashi; Ichiro Yamaura; Hiroki Sakai; Chikara Saito; Akihiro Tsuchiya; Kenji Takahashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 3.  Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon vs Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Mean Follow-up of 15 Years.

Authors:  Connor G Hoge; Robert N Matar; Lafi S Khalil; John A Buchan; Cole M Johnson; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-04

4.  Young men are at higher risk of failure after ACL hamstring reconstructions: a retrospective multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Martine C Keuning; Bart J Robben; Reinoud W Brouwer; Martin Stevens; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Rutger G Zuurmond
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Effect of Patient Height and Sex on the Patellar Tendon and Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Abigail L Campbell; Jon-Michael E Caldwell; Dheeraj Yalamanchili; Lia Sepanek; Keon Youssefzadeh; Carlos A Uquillas; Orr Limpisvasti
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  Return to Play After Patellar Tendon Autograft for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Rugby Players.

Authors:  Eoghan T Hurley; Dan Withers; Enda King; Andrew Franklyn-Miller; Mark Jackson; Ray Moran
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-03

7.  Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players.

Authors:  Luiz Gabriel Betoni Guglielmetti; Victor Eduardo Roman Salas; Pedro Baches Jorge; Fabrício Roberto Severino; Aires Duarte; Victor Marques de Oliveira; Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-24

8.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in 107 Competitive Wrestlers: Outcomes, Reoperations, and Return to Play at 6-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Erick M Marigi; Bryant M Song; Jory N Wasserburger; Christopher L Camp; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Kelechi R Okoroha; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-05

9.  Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Tendon-Bone Healing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rong-Jin Chen; Hao-Zhong Zhu; Xin-Yi Gu; Xian-Xiang Xiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Return to Sport After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft ACL Reconstruction in High School-Aged Athletes.

Authors:  Ryan C Rauck; John M Apostolakos; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Brandon L Schneider; Riley J Williams; Joshua S Dines; David W Altchek; Andrew Pearle; Answorth Allen; Beth Shubin Stein; David Dines; Anil Ranawat; Anne Kelly; Bryan Kelly; Howard Rose; Michael Maynard; Sabrina Strickland; Struan Coleman; Jo Hannafin; John MacGillivray; Robert Marx; Russell Warren; Scott Rodeo; Stephen Fealy; Stephen O'Brien; Thomas Wickiewicz
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.